help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DENNESEN, P. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by BONTEN, M. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DENNESEN, P. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by BONTEN, M. J. M.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 163, Number 6, May 2001, 1371-1375

Resolution of Infectious Parameters after Antimicrobial Therapy in Patients with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

PAUL J. W. DENNESEN, ANDRÉ J. A. M. van der VEN, ALPHONS G. H. KESSELS, GRAHAM RAMSAY, and MARC J. M. BONTEN

Departments of Medical Microbiology, Medical Technology Assessment and Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and AIDS, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although recommended durations of antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) range from 7 to 21 d, these are not based on prospective studies and little is known about the resolution of symptoms after start of antibiotics. Resolution of these symptoms was investigated in 27 patients. VAP was diagnosed on clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria, including quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage. All patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy. Highest temperatures, leukocyte counts, PaO2/FIO2 ratios, and semiquantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates were recorded from start of therapy until Day 14. Resolution was defined as the first day that these parameters fulfilled the following definition: temperature =< 38° C, leukocytes =< 10 × 109/L, PaO2/FIO2 ratio >=  25 kPa, and no or +1 of bacterial growth of etiologic pathogens in cultures of endotracheal aspirate. VAP was caused by Enterobacteriaceae (n = 14), P. aeruginosa (n = 7), S. aureus (n = 6), H. influenzae (n = 3), and S. pneumoniae (n = 1). H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae were eradicated from tracheal aspirates, whereas Enterobacteriaceae, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa persisted, despite in vitro susceptibility to antibiotics administered. Significant improvements were observed for all clinical parameters, most apparently within the first 6 d after start of antibiotics. Newly acquired colonization, especially with P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, occurred in the second week of therapy. Six patients developed a recurrent episode of VAP, four of them with P. aeruginosa. Clinical responses to therapy for VAP occur within the first 6 d of therapy, endotracheal colonization with Gram-negative bacteria persists despite susceptibility to therapy, and acquired colonization usually occurs in the second week of therapy and frequently precedes a recurrent episode.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (1). VAP has been associated with an attributable mortality of approximately 30% depending on the pathogen isolated (2, 3), especially when initial antibiotic therapy is inappropriate (4). Of all antibiotics prescribed for therapy in intensive care patients, approximately 50% are administered for respiratory tract infections (5). As a result, VAP has an important impact on patient morbidity and mortality, as well as on the costs for health care.

Diagnosing VAP is problematic because of the difficulties in distinguishing colonization of the respiratory tract from infection of the lung parenchyma, and the absence of a clinically useful gold standard (6). In most ICUs the diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria. Although the sensitivity of these criteria is high, specificity is low and antibiotics are frequently prescribed unnecessarily. The enormous use of antibiotics creates a constant threat for selection and induction of resistant pathogens and exposes patients to adverse effects. Therefore, reducing antibiotic use may have several beneficial aspects. Reductions in antibiotic use may be achieved by preventing the development of infections, optimizing the accuracy of diagnostic procedures (7), or reducing the length of treatment.

Little is known about the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for VAP. According to guidelines from the American Thoracic Society, VAP due to Haemophilus influenzae and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus should be treated for 7 to 10 d, whereas episodes caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. should be treated for at least 14 to 21 d (8). However, these recommendations are not based on the results of prospective studies. Furthermore, there is sparse information about resolution of infectious parameters associated with VAP after institution of appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Garrard and A'Court described a gradual normalization of a combination of clinical, microbiological, and radiographic parameters after the institution of antibiotic therapy (9). And Montravers and coworkers demonstrated, with a second bronchoscopy 3 d after institution of antimicrobial therapy, that appropriate therapy results in a rapid bacteriological clearance of the distal airways. However, the effects on clinical parameters were less evident (10). The aims of the present study were to describe the clinical and microbiological response to appropriate antimicrobial therapy in patients with VAP.

    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Setting

The study was conducted in the ICU of the University Hospital Maastricht from January 1, 1998 until January 1, 1999. The ICU is a 16-bed ward harboring a mixed population of medical, surgical, trauma, and neurological patients.

Patients and Data Collection

All patients who received mechanical ventilation for > 48 h and met the criteria for VAP (Table 1) were enrolled. Patients received empiric antibiotic treatment according to culture results of previously obtained endotracheal aspirates, and antibiotics were streamlined upon definite culture results from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Empiric therapy was considered appropriate when pathogens isolated in significant amounts from BAL samples were, in vitro, susceptible to the antibiotics. Routine surveillance included microbiological analysis of endotracheal aspirates on admission and subsequently twice weekly. The duration of antibiotic treatment was determined at the discretion of treating physicians. Demographic data (i.e., age, sex, preexistent diseases, and length of hospital stay before admission) and APACHE II admission scores were assessed as described by Knaus and coworkers (11). Clinical, laboratory, and microbiological variables were collected daily during 14 d starting at Day 0. The following data were obtained: highest temperature, arterial oxygen tension (PaO2)/fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2) ratio, leukocytes in the peripheral blood, and semiquantitative cultures of the endotracheal aspirate. In case of a clinical suspicion of VAP, endotracheal aspirates were obtained just before bronchoscopy.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1

 CRITERIA USED FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA*

Microbiological Analysis

Samples of endotracheal aspirates were inoculated on blood agar (Becton Dickinson, Columbia agar), cysteine lactose electrolyte-deficient agar (Becton Dickinson, CLED 43331), Haemophilus selective agar, and Streptococcus and Staphylococcus selective agar. The number of colony-forming units (cfu) was determined semiquantitatively by the four quadrant method and classified as follows: no growth, +1 = 102 cfu/ml, 2+ = 103 cfu/ ml, 3+ = 104 cfu/ml, and 4+ = 106 cfu/ml (10). We previously demonstrated that there is a good correlation between semiquantitative and quantitative analyses of endotracheal aspirates. All semiquantitative cultures with 4+ growth had quantitative culture results of >=  106 cfu/ml (12, 13).

Resolution of Infectious Parameters

Four parameters (i.e., highest temperature, leukocyte count in peripheral blood, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and semiquantitative culture result of endotracheal aspirate) were used to determine the resolution of infectious parameters. We adopted cut-off points for "normality" based on common clinical practice: highest temperature =< 38° C, leukocyte count in peripheral blood =< 10 × 103/mm3, PaO2/FIO2ratio >=  25 kPa, and no or +1 of bacterial growth, of bacteria similar to those isolated from BAL samples, in semiquantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates. Resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia was defined as the first day after start of therapy at which all parameters were "normal."

For additional analyses patients were grouped according to the pathogens causing VAP: community-acquired pathogens like Streptococcus pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus (group A); Enterobacteriaceae (group B); and P. aeruginosa (group C).

Statistical Analysis

Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to depict the changes of infectious parameters in time. Cox-regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of changes of individual infectious parameters. Daily changes of these parameters per patient were analyzed with linear regression and differences were tested with the one-sample t test. Mann-Whitney test (MW) and Kruskal-Wallis (KW) tests were used to compare groups. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Twenty-seven patients (16 male) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for VAP (Table 2). Antibiotic agents used before and after bronchoscopy, microorganisms isolated from cultures from endotracheal aspirates and BAL samples, results of the chest radiographs, duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP, time to extubation, length of ICU stay, and resolution of fever from individual patients are listed in Table E1 (see online data supplement-Table E1). Mean duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP was 11.5 ± 2.9 d (median 13 d, range 7-14 d). VAP was accompanied by bacteremia in four patients (15%). Most cases of VAP were caused by Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, accounting for 67% of causative microorganisms; in 14 patients VAP was caused by Enterobacteriaceae and in 7 patients by P. aeruginosa. In all, 35 bacterial species were isolated in significant amounts from BAL fluid. Seven episodes were polymicrobial (see online data supplement-Table E1). Initial antimicrobial therapy was appropriate in all cases. Despite in vitro susceptibility of isolated pathogens to the prescribed antimicrobial therapy, infection persisted in one patient (patient 1). On suspicion of superinfection a second BAL was performed after 6 d of treatment, which, again, yielded P. mirabilis with susceptibility for the initial administered antimicrobial therapy. These antibiotics were continued and the patient fully recovered.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 2

 BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY PATIENTS

A second episode of VAP was diagnosed in 6 patients (22%). In three patients a new pathogen (in all cases P. aeruginosa) was isolated, which was resistant to the antibiotics administered during the first episode. These patients (7, 8, and 9) acquired tracheal colonization with P. aeruginosa 5, 9, and 10 d after start of antimicrobial therapy, respectively, and developed infection 4 (7 and 8) and 21 d after discontinuation of therapy. In the other three patients (16, 25, and 27) similar bacterial species as those isolated in the first episode were associated with the second episode of VAP (i.e., P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and S. aureus). Only E. coli causing a new episode of VAP (patient 16), 8 d after discontinuation of therapy, was resistant to the antibiotics used during the first episode. Patient 25 acquired new colonization with S. aureus 4 d after a 14-d course of therapy with flucloxacillin and a recurrent episode of VAP was diagnosed 2 d later. Finally, patient 27 received 14 d of treatment with meropenem for P. aeruginosa VAP. During this period, tracheal colonization persisted and pulmonary infiltrates persisted. When fever recurred 6 d after discontinuation of antibiotics, a second BAL was performed and a recurrent episode of VAP was diagnosed.

Mean durations of antibiotic treatment were comparable for patients with VAP caused or not caused by P. aeruginosa; 12.7 ± 1.7 d (median 12.5, range 7-14 d) versus 11.1 ± 3.1 d (median 14, range 10-14 d), respectively ( p = 0.4, MW), and between those who did or did not experience a second episode of VAP, 10.3 ± 3.1 d (median 10, range 7-14 d) versus 11.5 ± 2.8 d, respectively (median 13, range 10-14 days) (p = 0.3, MW).

Seven patients died during hospitalization, and three of them died in the ICU. In these three patients, VAP was diagnosed 17- 59 d before death. In the other four patients, VAP was diagnosed 28-49 d before death. Therefore, in none of these patients did death seem to be directly attributable to VAP.

Resolution of Infectious Parameters

After institution of antibiotic therapy a gradual fall in the mean number of colony-forming units (cfu) in cultures of endotracheal aspirates was observed (Figure 1A). The bacterial load dropped from 5.4 cfu/ml on Day 0 to 1.4 cfu/ml on Day 15. However, there were extreme differences when comparing individual microorganisms. There was persistent colonization with P. aeruginosa in all patients, whereas bacterial colonization with S. aureus, H. influenzae, and S. pneumoniae completely disappeared from endotracheal aspirates (Figure 2A). Tracheal colonization with Enterobacteriaceae persisted in almost half of the patients. Interestingly, acquired tracheal colonization was demonstrated in several patients, usually during the second week of antimicrobial therapy and most frequently with P. aeruginosa (Figure 2B).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   (A) Mean log colony-forming units per milliliter of endotracheal aspirate of those bacteria associated with VAP after initiation of antimicrobial treatment. (B) Leukocyte count after initiation of antibiotic treatment. (C ) Highest temperature after initiation of antibiotic treatment. (D) PaO2/FIO2 ratio after initiation of antibiotic treatment.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   (A) Number of patients with initially isolated microorganisms from endotracheal aspirates collected in time after initiation of antibiotic treatment. (B) Number of patients with newly isolated microorganisms from endotracheal aspirates in time after initiation of antibiotic treatment.

Time to Resolution

All four parameters of infection improved significantly with time (Figure 1A-1D). On Day 0, averages of the four variables were leukocyte count, 14.2 ± 5.4 × 103/mm3, which decreased 0.15 × 103/mm3/d (p < 0.01); highest temperature, 38.8 ± 0.5° C, which decreased 0.05° C/d (p < 0.01); PaO2/FIO2, 26.3 ± 10.5 kPa, which increased 0.8 kPa/d (p < 0.01); and the bacterial load in endotracheal aspirates, 5.4 ± 1.2 cfu/ml, which decreased 0.2 cfu/ml/d (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found when comparing the daily changes in leukocyte counts, highest temperatures, and PaO2/FIO2 ratios between the three groups of causative pathogens of VAP (A, B, and C), not even in the first 6 d of treatment when changes were most prominent. The changes in leukocyte counts, highest temperatures, and PaO2/FIO2 ratios were -0.36 × 103/mm3, -0.1° C, and +1.2 kPa, respectively, in group A; -0.30 × 103/mm3, -0.16° C, and +1.4 kPa, respectively, in group B; and -0.27 × 103/mm3, -0.15° C, and +1.2 kPa, respectively, in group C (KW, NS).

For patients with abnormalities on Day 0 in temperature (> 38° C, n = 27), PaO2/FIO2 ratio(< 25 kPa, n = 17), leukocyte count (> 103/mm3, n = 21), and number of cfu/ml (> 102, n = 27), the mean (median) duration to resolution of these parameters was 5 (3), 6 (2), 8 (6), and 10 (7) d, respectively (Figure 3). The mean (median) duration until complete resolution (i.e., for all parameters) was 9 (8) d. When excluding microbiological eradication, the mean (median) duration of resolution for the remaining three clinical parameters was 6 (6) d. Mean duration of antibiotic treatment in this group of patients was 10 ± 2.8 d (median 10, range 7-14 days), as compared with 13.1 ± 2.1 d (median 14, range 7-14 d) if no complete resolution occurred (p < 0.01, MW).The PaO2/FIO2 ratio was the only significant covariate of resolution (p =< 0.01). The differences between the durations until resolution between groups A, B, C and between survivors and nonsurvivors were comparable (data not shown).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.   Probability of resolution of individual parameters after initiation of antibiotic treatment using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We described the resolution of infectious parameters after initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy for VAP. In general, resolution of clinical parameters is slow, most evident during the first 6 d of therapy and most apparent for the PaO2/FIO2 ratio. Appropriate antimicrobial therapy rapidly eradicates endotracheal colonization with S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus, but fails to eradicate colonization with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, indicating that follow-up of this parameter is an unreliable parameter for therapy success when these pathogens are involved. Moreover, tracheal colonization with resistant pathogens frequently occurs during the second week of therapy. Based on our findings, a shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy for VAP may be as effective and may reduce the risks of colonization and subsequent infection with more resistant pathogens.

There is sparse information about the clinical and microbiological response to appropriate antimicrobial therapy in patients with VAP. This may be related to the existing problems in diagnosing VAP. In clinical practice, VAP is usually diagnosed on a combination of clinical and radiographic criteria in combination with semiquantitative cultures from tracheal aspirates. The combination of these criteria has a high sensitivity for VAP, but specificity is low (7, 14). As a result, many patients will be incorrectly diagnosed as having VAP, and a description of resolution of clinical parameters in such a population may be influenced by patients having colonization instead of infection of the respiratory tract. In the present study, quantitative cultures from BAL were added to the combination of diagnostic criteria for diagnosing VAP. Although we realize that these methods cannot be considered a gold standard, they do represent the best clinically available tools to diagnose VAP. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that the use of invasive techniques, as used in this study, was associated with a better patient outcome and considerable reductions in antibiotic use (7). Although we found that temperature, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and leukocyte counts improved significantly in time after initiation of antibiotic treatment, the resolution of these parameters was generally slow. The mean time to resolution of these clinical parameters was 6 d. These patients were treated for a shorter duration, suggesting that clinicians take these clinical parameters into account in deciding whether to continue or discontinue therapy.

In a previous study Garrard and A'Court determined the clinical response to antimicrobial therapy in 83 patients with VAP (9). The clinical response was measured by daily values of the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), previously defined by Pugin and coworkers (15). The CPIS is a combination of clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria, with a maximum score of 12. Values of 7 or higher are considered diagnostic for VAP. Although quantitative cultures from bronchoscopic techniques are not included in the CPIS, these techniques were used for validation of the CPIS (15). Similar to our findings, they found a gradual improvement of the CPIS during the first 9 d after commencement of antibiotic therapy (9). In another study, Montravers and coworkers observed a significant decrease in temperature and increase in PaO2/FIO2 ratio within 3 d of antibiotic treatment, which was accompanied by eradication of bacteria from distal airways in the majority of patients, as demonstrated by repeated protective specimen brushes (PSB) (10).

Although interpretations of chest radiographs are important diagnostic criteria for VAP, we decided not to use this as a parameter of infection resolution. Chest radiographs are generally considered to be of limited value for defining clinical improvement in patients with pneumonia (16), although rapidly deteriorating abnormalities are suggestive of either progressive or recurrent episodes of VAP.

Our findings of persistent endotracheal colonization are completely different from the reported effects of antimicrobial therapy on repeated quantitative cultures from PSB, as reported by Montravers and coworkers (10). Using cultures from PSB, they demonstrated that bacteria were eradicated in distal airways in 51 of 76 patients with VAP within 3 d after start of antimicrobial treatment (10). These findings again emphasize that endotracheal colonization is not equivalent to infection of distal airways and that bacterial eradication from endotracheal aspirates is a poor marker for determination of clinical response of VAP, especially when caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Only when VAP is caused by H. influenzae or S. pneumoniae may follow-up of endotracheal aspirates be useful.

A recurrent episode of VAP was diagnosed in six patients. The clinical response to therapy for their first episode was not different as compared with the responses observed in patients who did not develop a recurrent episode. Four of the six pathogens associated with the recurrent episodes were resistant to antibiotics used to treat the first episode, and four episodes were caused by P. aeruginosa. A recurrent episode of VAP, caused by P. aeruginosa, may result from persistent colonization, acquired colonization from exogenous sources, or selection of endogenous colonization. Rello and coworkers recently described, using molecular biotyping, that recurrent episodes of VAP caused by P. aeruginosa were frequently caused by peristence of the causative strains in the respiratory tract (19). Our findings of persistent endotracheal colonization of P. aeruginosa in all patients with P. aeruginosa VAP, despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy, fully support these findings. Moreover, several other patients acquired tracheal colonization with P. aeruginosa during therapy. Although molecular biotyping was not performed in the present study, previous analyses in our ward demonstrated that colonization and infection with P. aeruginosa were only sporadically caused by cross-transmission, and that selection of endogenous strains, usually colonizing the intestinal tract, was a more important route of colonization (20).

Can our findings be extrapolated to ventilated patients in other settings? The etiology of bacteria causing VAP in our ward is characterized by the absence of important resistance problems, and, because of regular surveillance of tracheal aspirates, empirical therapy was in all cases appropriate. If empirical therapy would be inappropriate, as described in other studies (2, 4), clinical responses may be completely different or even absent. The lack of a standardized approach for antibiotic prescription and discontinuation may be a possible weakness of the present study. However, the practice, as described here, is the current practice in our ICU, and was, therefore, most appropriate to investigate. Moreover, our patient population was small and causes of VAP were heterogeneous, thereby limiting extrapolation to other patient groups.

In conclusion, the clinical response to antimicrobial therapy for VAP, diagnosed with bronchoscopic techniques, occurs within the first 6 d of therapy; colonization with Gram-negative bacteria will persist in many patients; and acquired colonization, predominantly with resistant pathogens, occurs mainly in the second week of therapy. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that a duration of therapy for VAP of 7 d would be sufficient and could prevent recurrent colonization and infection with more resistant bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa. Currently, a duration of therapy of 14 to 21 d is recommended for VAP caused by Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa (8).

A strategy to treat VAP for 7 instead of 14-21 d should be tested in a prospective randomized study design. A shorter duration of therapy would reduce the selective pressure for colonization, and, thereby, the risks of recurrent infection with resistant pathogens. Moreover, a reduction in antibiotic use may reduce the risks of adverse drug events and help to control health care costs, in which costs for antibiotics are elementary.

    Footnotes

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Marc J.M. Bonten, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and AIDS, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: m.bonten{at}wxs.nl

(Received in original form July 6, 2000 and in revised form January 16, 2001).

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org.
    References
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) study. JAMA 1995; 274: 639-644 [Abstract].

2. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Hance AJ, Montravers P, Novara A, Gibert C. Nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients: a cohort study evaluating attributable mortality and hospital stay. Am J Med 1993; 94: 281-288 [Medline].

3. Crouch Brewer S, Wunderink RG, Jones CB, Leeper KV. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chest 1996;109:1019-1029.

4. Luna CM, Vujacich P, Niederman MS, Vay C, Gherardi C, Matera J, Jolly EC. Impact of BAL data on the therapy and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1997; 111: 676-685 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

5. Bergmans DCJJ, Bonten MJM, Gaillard CA, van Tiel FH, van der Geest S, de Leeuw PW, Stobberingh EE. Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 39: 527-535 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

6. Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, Wouters EF, van Tiel FH, Stobberingh EE, van der Geest S. Problems in diagnosing nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a review. Crit Care Med 1994:22:1683-1691.

7. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Wolff M, Gervais C, Parer-Aubas S, Stephan F, Similowski T, Mercat A, Diehl JL, Sollet JP, Tenaillon A. Invasive and noninvasive strategies for management of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2000; 18: 621-630 .

8. Hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis, assessment of severity, initial antimicrobial therapy, and preventative strategies. A consensus statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;153:1711-1725.

9. Garrard CS, A'Court CD. The diagnosis of pneumonia in the critically ill. Chest 1995;108(2 Suppl):17S-25S.

10. Montravers P, Fagon JY, Castre J, Lesco M, Dombret MC, Trouillet JL, Gibert C. Follow-up protected specimen brushes to assess treatment in nosocomial pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147: 38-44 [Medline].

11. Knaus WA, Draper EA. , Wagner DP., Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-829 [Medline].

12. Cruickshank R, Duguid JP, Marmion BP, et al. Medical microbiology, 12th ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.

13. Bergmans DCJJ, Bonten MJM, De Leeuw PW, Stobberingh EE. Reproducibility of quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates from mechanically ventilated patients. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 796-798 [Abstract].

14. Bonten MJM, Bergmans DCJJ, Stobberingh EE, van der Geest S, De Leeuw PW, van Tiel FH, Gaillard CA. Implementation of bronchoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 1820-1824 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

15. Pugin J, Auckenthaler R, Mili N, Janssens JP, Lew PD, Suter PM. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic "blind" bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 143: 1121-1129 [Medline].

16. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Hance AJ, Guiget M, Trouillet JL, Domart Y, Pierre J, Gibert C. Detection of nosocomial lung infection in ventilated patients: use of a protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques in 147 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 138: 110-116 [Medline].

17. Wunderink RG, Woldenberg LS, Zeiss J, Day CM, Ciemins J, Lacher DA. The radiologic diagnosis of autopsy-proven ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1992; 101: 458-463 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

18. Salata RA, Lederman MM, Shlaes DM, Jacobs MR, Eckstein E, Tweardy D, Toossi Z, Chmielewski R, Marino J, King CH, et al . . Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated, intensive care patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135: 426-432 [Medline].

19. Rello J, Mariscal D, March F, Jubert P, Sanchez F, Valles J, Coll P. Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in ventilated patients: relapse or reinfection? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 912-916 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

20. Bonten MJ, Bergmans DC, Speijer H, Stobberingh EE. Characteristics of polyclonal endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization in intensive care units: implications for infection control. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 1212-1219 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

21. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS: definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149: 818-824 [Abstract].





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. R. Hauser
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An Uninvited Guest Refuses to Leave
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2008; 178(5): 438 - 439.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
J. Chastre and C. E. Luyt
Optimising the duration of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia
Eur. Respir. Rev., August 1, 2007; 16(103): 40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
S. M. Koenig and J. D. Truwit
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 637 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
I. Porzecanski and D. L. Bowton
Diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 597 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
K. A. Davis
Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review.
J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2006; 21(4): 211 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. H. Kollef
Microbiological Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: Using the Data to Optimize Clinical Outcomes.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2006; 173(11): 1182 - 1184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. F. Shorr and M. H. Kollef
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Insights From Recent Clinical Trials
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_2): 583S - 591S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. H. Kollef and K. E. Kollef
Antibiotic Utilization and Outcomes for Patients With Clinically Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Negative Quantitative BAL Culture Results
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2706 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. Povoa, L. Coelho, E. Almeida, A. Fernandes, R. Mealha, P. Moreira, and H. Sabino
C-reactive protein as a marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia resolution: a pilot study
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2005; 25(5): 804 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. L. Yershov, B. S. Jordan, C. H. Guymon, and M. A. Dubick
Relationship between the inoculum dose of Streptococcus pneumoniae and pneumonia onset in a rabbit model
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2005; 25(4): 693 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2005; 171(4): 388 - 416.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
F. Michel, B. Franceschini, P. Berger, J.-M. Arnal, M. Gainnier, J.-M. Sainty, and L. Papazian
Early Antibiotic Treatment for BAL-Confirmed Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Role for Routine Endotracheal Aspirate Cultures
Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2): 589 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C.-E. Luyt, V. Guerin, A. Combes, J.-L. Trouillet, S. B. Ayed, M. Bernard, C. Gibert, and J. Chastre
Procalcitonin Kinetics as a Prognostic Marker of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2005; 171(1): 48 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. Afessa
From "Pro and Con" Debate to Evidence-Based Practice: Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1600 - 1602.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. T. Micek, S. Ward, V. J. Fraser, and M. H. Kollef
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Antibiotic Discontinuation Policy for Clinically Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1791 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Chastre, M. Wolff, J.-Y. Fagon, S. Chevret, F. Thomas, D. Wermert, E. Clementi, J. Gonzalez, D. Jusserand, P. Asfar, et al.
Comparison of 8 vs 15 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Adults: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, November 19, 2003; 290(19): 2588 - 2598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
R. P. Baughman and M. A. Kerr
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Patients who Do Not Reduce Bacteria from the Lungs have a Worse Prognosis
J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 269 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Beutz, G. Sherman, J. Mayfield, V. J. Fraser, and M. H. Kollef
Clinical Utility of Blood Cultures Drawn From Central Vein Catheters and Peripheral Venipuncture in Critically Ill Medical Patients
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 854 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Iregui, S. Ward, G. Sherman, V. J. Fraser, and M. H. Kollef
Clinical Importance of Delays in the Initiation of Appropriate Antibiotic Treatment for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia*
Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DENNESEN, P. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by BONTEN, M. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DENNESEN, P. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by BONTEN, M. J. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society