|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In mechanically ventilated patients with airway obstruction, helium-oxygen (He-O2) mixtures reduce airway resistance and improve ventilation, but their influence on aerosol delivery is unknown. Accordingly, we determined the effect of various He-O2
mixtures on albuterol delivery from metered-dose inhalers (MDIs)
and jet nebulizers in an in vitro model of mechanical ventilation.
Albuterol delivery from a MDI was increased when the ventilator
circuit contained 80% helium and 20% oxygen (He-O2 80/20) versus O2: 46.7 ± 3.3 versus 30.2 ± 1.3 (SE)% of the nominal dose (p < 0.001)
the difference was mainly due to decreased drug deposition in the spacer chamber, mean 39.2% and 55.2%, respectively
(p < 0.001). Nebulizer efficiency at a flow rate of 6 L/min was five
times lower with He-O2 80/20 than O2, and the amount of nebulized drug was inversely correlated with gas density (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001). When the nebulizer was operated with O2, greater albuterol delivery was achieved when the ventilator circuit contained
He-O2 rather than O2. In summary, He-O2 mixtures in the circuit
increased aerosol delivery for both MDIs and nebulizers in the mechanically ventilated model by as much as 50%. In conclusion, at
appropriate flow rates and concentrations, He-O2 in the ventilator
circuit may improve aerosol delivery in mechanically ventilated patients with severe airway obstruction.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A gas mixture of helium and oxygen has a lower density than air. By converting regions of density-dependent turbulent airflow within the large airways to laminar flow, helium-oxygen (He-O2) mixtures can improve expiratory flow and decrease the resistive work of breathing (1). In ambulatory patients with asthma, some investigators reported that inhalation of He-O2 mixtures decreased dyspnea and pulsus paradoxus, and improved pulmonary gas exchange (5), whereas others reported no benefits (9). In spontaneously breathing patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inhalation of He-O2 reduced arterial carbon dioxide tension (12). In mechanically ventilated patients with severe asthma, inhalation of He-O2 decreased airway resistance and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, and improved CO2 elimination (13, 14). In patients receiving noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of COPD, He-O2 decreased dyspnea and work of breathing, and improved gas exchange (15, 16).
The pulmonary deposition of particles within an aerosol is influenced by the density of the gas being administered to the patient (17). Accordingly, He-O2 is likely to influence pulmonary deposition of aerosolized bronchodilators, yet this interaction has been studied by surprisingly few investigators. Compared with air, Hess and colleagues (18) found that operating a nebulizer with He-O2 decreased both the fraction of the nominal dose collected on a filter placed at the end of the T connector, and the aerosol's respirable mass in an in vitro model. Conversely, patients with asthma who breathed He-O2 80/20 displayed greater pulmonary deposition of monodisperse Teflon particles (~ 3.7 µm aerodynamic diameter) than when breathing air (19, 20). The influence, however, of He-O2 on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation is not known.
In-line nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) are used for bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients (21). The efficiency of these devices in delivering aerosols to the lower respiratory tract is less in mechanically ventilated patients than in ambulatory patients (21). Methods for enhancing aerosol delivery in such patients could improve clinical benefit and reduce costs. In a pediatric model of mechanical ventilation, albuterol delivery from a MDI was increased when the device was operated with a He-O2 70/30 mixture versus the same balance of nitrogen and oxygen (22). It is not known, however, how differing concentrations of helium might influence the generation of aerosols from MDIs and nebulizers nor their delivery to the lower respiratory tract of mechanically ventilated patients. To avoid unexpected hazard to critically ill patients, we used a mechanically ventilated tracheobronchial model to study the influence of various concentrations of He-O2 on aerosol delivery from MDIs and nebulizers. In previous studies, we have shown that this in vitro model accurately reflects changes in in vivo delivery of aerosol in mechanically ventilated patients (23, 24).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Description of the Lung Model
Studies were conducted employing a tracheobronchial model that allows investigation of aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation (Figure 1); this model is similar to that described in our previous publications (23, 24). A Siemens 900C ventilator (Elema AB, Solna, Sweden) was employed because it maintains accurate volumes and flows with He-O2 mixtures (25). The ventilator provided controlled mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 800 ml, a frequency of 12 breaths/min, and a peak inspiratory flow of 40 L/min delivered with a square-wave configuration. A H-cylinder containing He-O2 80/20 and a 50 pound per square inch regulator (Puritan Bennett Corp., Lenexa, KS) was attached to the air inlet of a standard oxygen-air blender (Bird Corporation, Palm Springs, CA). The O2 concentrations were continuously monitored with a fuel cell oxygen analyzer (Hudson, Temecula, CA), placed in the inspiratory limb between the ventilator and the MDI or between the nebulizer and endotracheal tube. To avoid erroneous readings of tidal volume and inspiratory air flow secondary to gas mixtures of varying density, a pneumotachometer (Ventrak, Wallingford, CT) was placed between the test lung and the filters (Figure 1). The pneumotachometer uses an algorithm that allows accurate readings of air flow and volume for specific concentrations of He-O2. The accuracy of the measured volumes and the linearity of the response of each pneumotachometer was verified with a volumetric syringe containing various concentrations of He-O2 and air-O2. Tidal volume, measured by the pneumotachometer, was also compared with the volume displacement of the test lung (Michigan Instruments, Grand Rapids, MI), with measurements varying between the two devices by less than 3%. The quantity of albuterol was collected on a filter with a pore size less than 0.3 µm (Respirgard II bacterial/viral Filter, No. 303; Marquest Medical Products, Inc., Englewood, CO); the albuterol deposited on the filter was measured by spectrophotometry. Experiments with the ventilator were performed with inspired gas at ambient temperature (25 to 27° C) and a relative humidity (RH) of < 30%, or when heated to 35 ± 1° C and RH of 98 ± 2% (Fast-Response Digital Hygrometer/Thermometer; Curtin Matheson, Houston, TX).
|
Experiment 1: Influence of Gas Density on Aerosol Delivery with a MDI
MDI canisters (albuterol; Schering, Kenilworth, NJ; manufacturer estimated dose of 90 µg/puff) were warmed to hand temperature, well shaken, and primed, that is, each MDI was actuated 5 times before testing to ensure that the subsequent actuations provided a homogenous mixture of canister ingredients. Each subsequent actuation of the MDI was discharged into a MDI spacer (Aerovent; Monaghan Medical Inc., Plattsburgh, NY) in the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit at the onset of inspiration; successive doses from the MDI were actuated at 15-s intervals. Albuterol was administered from a set of four MDIs actuated in rotation.
To determine the influence of gas density on the delivery of albuterol, 8 puffs (720 µg) of albuterol were administered from a MDI into a chamber spacer during mechanical ventilation with the circuit containing air, O2, or He-O2 mixtures of 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, and 50/50. The tests were performed either at ambient conditions of temperature and humidity or with heated and humidified gas mixtures, and were repeated six times with each gas mixture. Albuterol deposition was measured on filters placed at the ends of the bronchi in the lung model (Figure 1).
To determine the effect of gas density on the location of aerosol deposition within the ventilator circuit, 8 puffs (720 µg) of albuterol were administered by MDI and chamber spacer into a dry, unheated ventilator circuit containing He-O2 80/20 or O2. Albuterol deposition was measured on filters placed immediately distal to the chamber spacer, between the elbow connector and the endotracheal tube, and at the ends of the bronchi in the lung model (Figure 1) (n = 3 for each site).
Experiment 2: Influence of He-O2 on Nebulizer Efficiency
A small-volume nebulizer (AeroTech II; CIS-US Inc., Bedford, MA) was filled with 5 ml of albuterol sulfate solution (Proventil; Schering, Kenilworth, NJ) at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml (nominal dose 2.5 mg) and placed in the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit 45 cm from the circuit wye. Oxygen or He-O2 80/20, each at a flow rate of 6 L/ min, was used to generate aerosol continuously throughout the breathing cycle. A pressure-compensated oxygen flow meter (Timeter, St. Louis, MO) was used to adjust gas flow through the nebulizer, and appropriate calibration factors were applied to correct for the lower density of the He-O2 mixtures (26). After 5 min of nebulization, albuterol deposition was measured on a filter placed immediately distal to the T-piece of the nebulizer.
To determine the effect of gas density on nebulizer efficiency, the nebulizer was operated at a flow rate of 6 L/min using air, O2, and He- O2 mixtures of 80/20, 60/40, 40/60, and 20/80. For each gas mixture, albuterol deposition was measured on a filter placed immediately distal to the T-piece of the nebulizer.
To determine the influence of gas flow rates on nebulizer efficiency, the nebulizer was operated separately with He-O2 70/30 and O2 at flow rates of 5, 10, and 15 L/min. At each flow rate, albuterol deposition was measured on a filter placed immediately distal to the T-piece of the nebulizer.
Experiment 3: Optimizing Aerosol Delivery with a Nebulizer during Mechanical Ventilation
To determine which combination of gas mixtures delivers the most aerosol, the nebulizer was operated at three sets of gas composition and flow rates: O2 at 6 L/min as recommended by the nebulizer manufacturer, He-O2 70/30 at 6 L/min, and He-O2 70/30 at 15 L/min. Each run was performed in a humidified ventilator circuit containing either O2 or He-O2 70/30; of gases commercially available, He-O2 70/30 has the highest level of helium while also ensuring an O2 concentration of more than 20%. With the nebulizer operated with O2 at 6 L/min, the final concentration of He-O2 in the ventilator circuit was reduced to 61/39 ± 2%. Albuterol deposition was measured on filters placed at the ends of the main bronchi in the lung model.
Assay Technique
On completion of each experiment, the filters were labeled, capped and filled with 5 ml of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, and the albuterol eluted by gently shaking for 24 h. The volume recovered from each filter was recorded and the albuterol concentration determined at a wavelength of 246 nm (DU 64 spectrophotometer; Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide as the reference. Individual experiments were repeated three times on different days with single-blind analysis.
Data Analysis
All results were expressed as the absolute amount of drug in micrograms or as the fraction of nominal dose delivered (mean ± SE). Results were analyzed with repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) using multivariate analysis, with Scheffe's F-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. The regression coefficient (r) was calculated with statistical software (SuperANOVA; Abacus Concept, Berkeley, CA).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1: Influence of Gas Density on Aerosol Delivery with a MDI
Delivery of albuterol from a MDI and chamber spacer was
greater when the ventilator circuit contained higher concentrations of He-O2: 46.7 ± 3.3% and 43.9 ± 1.0% of the nominal
dose for He-O2 80/20 and 70/30, respectively. The latter deliveries were higher than the drug deliveries observed with He-O2
mixtures of 60/40 and 50/50: 39.0 ± 0.9% and 39.9 ± 1.3%, respectively (p < 0.04). Albuterol delivery was significantly
greater with each of the He-O2 mixtures than with air (30.2 ± 1.3%, p < 0.0001) or O2 (29.1 ± 1.3%, p < 0.0001). Albuterol
delivery was inversely related to gas density in the ventilator
circuit (r =
0.98, p < 0.005) (Figure 2). For both He-O2 or air,
albuterol delivery was reduced significantly when the ventilator
circuit was heated and humidified versus a dry circuit (Table 1).
In a humidified ventilator circuit, delivery of albuterol remained higher with He-O2 80/20 than with air (p = 0.02).
|
|
The density of gas within the ventilator circuit significantly
altered the pattern of aerosol deposition (Figure 3). The enhancement in albuterol delivery to the lower airways with He-
O2 80/20 over O2 was mainly due to a decrease in aerosol deposition in the chamber spacer: mean 39.2% versus 55.2% (p < 0.001). Deposition of aerosol in the endotracheal tube was
also decreased by He-O2 80/20
mean 1.4 versus 4.2% for O2
(p < 0.01) (Figure 3). Albuterol deposition in the ventilator
circuit between the chamber spacer and endotracheal tube was
comparable for He-O2 80/20 and O2
13.3% and 10.2%, respectively (p = 0.86) (Figure 3).
|
Experiment 2: Influence of He-O2 on Nebulizer Efficiency
When the nebulizer was operated at a flow rate of 6 L/min, the use of He-O2 80/20 reduced drug delivery to a filter placed immediately distal to the T-piece of the nebulizer by fivefold compared with O2: 38.7 ± 0.7 µg versus 191.8 ± 36.4 µg (p = 0.0005). Albuterol delivery from the nebulizer was related to gas density (r = 0.944, p < 0.001), with the most dense gas, O2, yielding the highest drug delivery (Figure 4). Albuterol delivery from the nebulizer was greater for O2 and air than for He- O2 mixtures of 80/20 and 60/40 (p < 0.001) (Figure 4).
|
When the nebulizer was operated with He-O2 70/30, more albuterol was delivered to a filter placed immediately distal to the T-piece of the nebulizer when the flow rate was 10 L/min versus 5 L/min (p < 0.001). Likewise, when the nebulizer was operated with O2, albuterol delivery was greater with a flow of 10 L/min versus 5 L/min (p < 0.01) (Table 2). At a gas flow of 5 L/min, nebulizer efficiency was 17-fold higher with O2 than with He-O2 70/30 (p < 0.001); at a gas flow of 10 L/min, nebulizer efficiency was twofold higher with O2 (p < 0.01) (Table 2). For He-O2 70/30, an increase in nebulizer flow from 10 to 15 L/min resulted in a 3.5-fold increase in nebulizer efficiency (p < 0.01). It was not possible to operate the nebulizer using O2 at a flow rate of 15 L/min because a build-up of back-pressure disconnected the tubing from the nebulizer inlet. Albuterol delivery to a filter placed immediately distal to the T-piece of the nebulizer was almost doubled when the nebulizer was operated with He-O2 70/30 at 15 L/min than with O2 at 10/L min (p < 0.0001) (Table 2).
|
Experiment 3: Optimizing Aerosol Delivery with a Nebulizer by Using Various Gas Mixtures during Mechanical Ventilation
When the nebulizer was operated with a flow of 6 L/min, albuterol delivery to the lower respiratory tract was approximately 50% higher with the use of O2 versus He-O2 70/30 (Figure 5). To obtain aerosol delivery equivalent to that obtained with O2 at a flow rate of 6 L/min, it was necessary to operate the nebulizer with He-O2 70/30 at flow rates of 15 L/min (Figure 5). The highest amount of albuterol was delivered to filters placed at the ends of the tracheobronchial model when the nebulizer was operated with O2 and the ventilator circuit contained He-O2 70/30 (Figure 5).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
He-O2 mixtures can substantially enhance or reduce the efficiency of bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation, depending on specific circumstances. Delivery of albuterol from a MDI to the lower respiratory tract was enhanced when the ventilator circuit contained He-O2 mixtures as opposed to air or O2 (Table 1). Conversely, when a nebulizer was operated with He-O2, instead of O2, albuterol delivery was reduced (Table 2). The greatest delivery of aerosol to the lower respiratory tract was achieved by operating the nebulizer with O2 and entraining the aerosol into a ventilator circuit containing He-O2. Further studies are needed to determine if the increased aerosol delivery with He-O2 mixtures enhances bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated patients.
Effect of He-O2 on MDI Delivery
Aerosol therapy is frequently administered to mechanically
ventilated patients using a MDI and chamber spacer. We and
other (23, 24, 27) have shown that several factors, including tidal volume, inspiratory flow rate, and circuit humidity influence the deposition of aerosol generated by a MDI during mechanical ventilation, but the influence of gas density on aerosol delivery was not known. In this study, we show that aerosol
delivery was inversely related to the density of gas in the ventilator circuit
delivery being greatest with the least dense
gas, i.e., He-O2 80/20 (Figure 2). With helium concentration of
70% or higher, albuterol delivery was increased by half or
more over that achieved with air or O2. When the ventilator
circuit was humidified, delivery of albuterol to the main bronchi was decreased; the reduction was virtually identical for
He-O2 80/20 and air
slightly in excess of 60% (Table 1). In
the presence of He-O2 80/20, aerosol delivery in a humidified circuit was comparable to aerosol delivery in a dry ventilator circuit being ventilated with air.
Mechanisms for Improved Aerosol Delivery with a MDI in Circuits Containing He-O2
The deposition of aerosol particles in a ventilator circuit and the respiratory tract is mainly achieved through impaction and sedimentation. We previously showed that most of the aerosol emitted from a MDI impacts in the ventilator circuit before reaching the lungs (24). We now show that the amount of albuterol depositing in a chamber spacer and endotracheal tube is decreased when the ventilator circuit contains He-O2 rather than O2 (Figure 3), leaving a greater fraction to reach the tracheobronchial region. Given the nature of our model, the influence of He-O2 on particle sedimentation cannot be determined.
Turbulence in the airways is associated with greater impaction of aerosol particles, reducing aerosol delivery to the lungs (28, 29). With high airflow, Reynolds number, which governs the type of flow within a tube of fixed diameter, can exceed the threshold for nonlaminar flow, i.e., 2,000 units, in the human trachea (30). For a similar flow and airway dimensions, Reynolds number for He-O2 80/20 is decreased to approximately one-third that with O2 (20). This factor reasonably explains the reduction in aerosol deposition in the spacer device, endotracheal tube, and major airways when the ventilator circuit contained He-O2 rather than O2 (Figure 3).
The inspiratory flow rates during mechanical ventilation exceed those during spontaneous breathing, and are likely to contribute to turbulent flows with increased aerosol deposition in the central airways. When a radiolabeled aerosol was administered to mechanically ventilated patients by a MDI and chamber spacer, most of it deposited in the central zone of the lung (31). We previously reported that aerosol delivery to filters placed at the ends of the bronchi in our tracheobronchial model was twofold higher at an inspiratory flow rate of 40 L/min than at 80 L/min (24). That is, turbulence in the air stream produced by high ventilator flows appears to increase aerosol deposition within the ventilator circuit and major airways. The improvement in aerosol delivery with He-O2 in the ventilator circuit may be a consequence of its ability to promote a more laminar pattern at any given flow rate.
Effect of He-O2 on Nebulizer Efficiency
Nebulizers were originally employed in preference to MDIs for aerosol therapy in mechanically ventilated patients (32). We confirm the findings of Hess and coworkers who reported that both the nebulizer efficiency and the proportion of drug contained within respirable particles are decreased when nebulizers are operated with He-O2 rather than O2 at similar flow rates (18). We further show that the amount of drug leaving a nebulizer decreases linearly as a function of gas density (Figure 4). Entrainment of a solution by a gas and the creation of an aerosol during jet nebulization is governed by the Bernoulli principle, which describes the relationship between gas density and velocity with pressures generated at the jet orifice. Reducing gas density or velocity diminishes the pressure drop across a jet orifice, reducing the amount of aerosol generated. Accordingly, we suspected that operating a nebulizer with a higher flow of He-O2 might increase the amount of aerosol being generated, compensating for the effects of reduced gas density. When the nebulizer was operated with He-O2 flow of 15 L/min, nebulizer efficiency matched that achieved by operating the nebulizer with O2 at a flow rate of 6 L/min (Table 2).
Nebulizer Operation with He-O2 in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
During mechanical ventilation, the gas used in operating a nebulizer may be supplied intermittently, from the ventilator, or continuously from a secondary gas source, such as an air compressor or cylinder. Investigators have previously shown that the intermittent method of nebulizer operation is more efficient for aerosol delivery than continuous aerosol generation (21). Based on our findings, intermittent operation of a nebulizer with He-O2 mixtures from the ventilator would result in markedly reduced efficiency; accordingly, it is preferable to operate the nebulizer continuously using He-O2 mixtures. During continuous operation of the nebulizer, a He-O2 of 15 L/ min was required to match the efficiency achieved with O2 at 6 L/min. Use of such continuous high flows of He-O2 through the circuit would waste gas, and also require readjustment of minute ventilation settings during nebulizer operation. Aerosol delivery to the lower respiratory tract of the tracheobronchial model could be optimized by operating the nebulizer continuously with O2 at 6 L/min and entraining the aerosol in a ventilator circuit containing He-O2. Although this method of nebulizer operation is tedious to set up, it increases aerosol delivery by approximately 60% over that achieved in a ventilator circuit containing O2 (Figure 5). While nebulizer performance can be improved by increasing He-O2 flow rates, nebulizer operation during mechanical ventilation with He-O2 is less straightforward than use of a MDI. Careful attention to the details of nebulizer operation is required to achieve maximal nebulizer efficiency when using He-O2 mixtures in the ventilator circuit.
In summary, He-O2 in the ventilator circuit improved delivery of albuterol from both MDIs and nebulizers. The increase in aerosol delivery from a MDI was inversely correlated with the density of gas, that is, higher concentrations of helium in the ventilator circuit produced higher aerosol delivery. Conversely, efficiency of a nebulizer was markedly reduced when it was operated with helium. When using a He-O2 80/20 mixture to operate the nebulizer, 2.5 times higher flow of gas was needed to achieve nebulizer efficiency comparable to that achieved with O2. Maximal efficiency was achieved when the nebulizer was operated with O2 and the aerosol emitted was entrained into a ventilator circuit containing He-O2. In conclusion, with a carefully executed technique of administration, use of He-O2 mixtures in the ventilator circuit can increase delivery of aerosolized bronchodilators from both MDIs and nebulizers by as much as 50%; this degree of improvement could lead to significantly better outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with severe airway obstruction.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Rajiv Dhand, M.D., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine - 111 N, Edwards Hines Jr. VA Hospital, 5th Ave. and Roosevelt Road, Hines, IL 60141.
(Received in original form March 7, 2000 and in revised form July 14, 2000).
Acknowledgments:
Supported in part by VA Research Service.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Chan-Yeung M, Aboud R, Tsao MS, Maclean L. Effect of helium on maximal expiratory flow in patients with asthma before and during induced bronchoconstriction. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976; 113: 433-443 [Medline].
2.
Wood LDH,
Engel LA,
Griffin P,
Despas P,
Macklem PT.
Effect of gas
physical properties and flow on lower pulmonary resistance.
J Appl
Physiol
1976;
41:
234-244
3.
Mink S,
Ziesmann M,
Wood LDH.
Mechanisms of increased expiratory
flow during He-O2 breathing in dogs.
J Appl Physiol
1979;
47:
490-502
4. Mink S, Wood LDH. How does HeO2 increase maximum expiratory flow in human lungs? J Clin Invest 1980; 66: 720-729 .
5.
Kass JE,
Castriotta RJ.
Heliox therapy in acute severe asthma.
Chest
1995;
107:
757-760
6. Manthous CA, Hall JB, Melmed A, Caputo MA, Walter J, Klocksieben JM, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH. Heliox improves pulsus paradoxus and peak expiratory flow in nonintubated patients with severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 310-314 [Abstract].
7. Kudukis TM, Manthous CA, Schmidt GA, Hall JB, Wylam ME. Inhaled helium-oxygen revisited: effect of inhaled helium-oxygen during the treatment of status asthmaticus in children. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 217-224 [Medline].
8.
Kass JE,
Terregino CA.
The effect of heliox in acute severe asthma: a
randomized controlled trial.
Chest
1999;
116:
296-300
9.
Carter ER,
Webb CR,
Moffitt DR.
Evaluation of heliox in children hospitalized with acute severe asthma: a randomized crossover trial.
Chest
1996;
109:
1256-1261
10. Verbeek PR, Chopra A. Heliox does not improve FEV1 in acute asthma patients. J Emerg Med 1998; 16: 545-548 [Medline].
11. Henderson SO, Acharya P, Kilaghbian T, Perez J, Korn CS, Chan LS. Use of heliox-driven nebulizer therapy in the treatment of acute asthma. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 141-146 [Medline].
12.
Swidwa DM,
Montenegro HD,
Goldman MD,
Lutchen KR,
Saidel GM.
Helium-oxygen breathing in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease.
Chest
1985;
87:
790-795
13.
Gluck EH,
Onorato DJ,
Castriotta R.
Helium-oxygen mixtures in intubated patients with status asthmaticus and respiratory acidosis.
Chest
1990;
98:
693-698
14. Schaeffer EM, Pohlman A, Morgan S, Hall JB. Oxygenation in status asthmaticus improves during ventilation with helium-oxygen. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2666-2670 [Medline].
15. Jolliet P, Tassaux D, Thouret JM, Chevrolet JC. Beneficial effects of helium:oxygen versus air:oxygen noninvasive pressure support in patients with decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2422-2429 [Medline].
16.
Jaber S,
Redouane F,
Carlucci A,
Boussarsar M,
Pigeot J,
Lemaire F,
Harf A,
Lofaso F,
Isabey D,
Brochard L.
Noninvasive ventilation with
helium-oxygen in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2000;
161:
1191-1200
17. Dolovich MB. Aerosols. In: Barnes PJ, Grunstein MM, Leff AR, Woolcock AJ, editors. Asthma. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 1349-1366.
18.
Hess DR,
Acosta FL,
Ritz RH,
Kacmarek RM,
Camargo CA.
The effect
of heliox on nebulizer function using a
-agonist bronchodilator.
Chest
1999;
115:
184-189
19. Svartengren M, Anderson M, Philipson K, Camner P. Human lung deposition of particles suspended in air or helium/oxygen mixture. Exp Lung Res 1989; 15: 575-585 [Medline].
20. Anderson M, Svartengren M, Bylin G, Philipson K, Camner P. Deposition in asthmatics of particles inhaled in air or in helium-oxygen. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147: 524-528 [Medline].
21.
Dhand R,
Tobin MJ.
Pulmonary perspective: inhaled bronchodilator
therapy in mechanically ventilated patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care
Med
1997;
156:
3-10
22. Habib DM, Garner SS, Brandeburg S. Effect of helium-oxygen on delivery of albuterol in a pediatric, volume-cycled, ventilated lung model. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 143-149 [Medline].
23. Fink JB, Dhand R, Duarte AG, Jenne JW, Tobin MJ. Aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 382-387 [Abstract].
24.
Fink JB,
Dhand R,
Grychowski J,
Fahey PJ,
Tobin MJ.
Reconciling in
vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-
enhancing factors.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
159:
63-68
25.
Tassaux D,
Jolliet P,
Thouret JM,
Roeseler J,
Dorne R,
Chevrolet JC.
Calibration of seven ICU ventilators for mechanical ventilation with
helium-oxygen mixtures.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
160:
22-32
26. Branson RD. Gas delivery systems: regulators, flowmeters and therapy devices. In: Branson RD, Hess D, Chatburn RL, editors. Respiratory care equipment, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 1999. p. 59.
27. Diot P, Morra L, Smaldone GC. Albuterol delivery in a model of mechanical ventilation: comparison of metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 1391-1394 [Abstract].
28. Dolovich M. Physical principles underlying aerosol therapy. J Aerosol Med 1989; 2: 171-186 .
29. Heyder J, Gebbart J, Rudolf G, Stahlhofen W. Physical factors determining particle deposition in the human respiratory tract. J Aerosol Sci 1980; 11: 505-515 .
30.
Jaffrin MY,
Kesic P.
Airway resistance: a fluid mechanical approach.
J
Appl Physiol
1974;
36:
354-361
31. Fuller HD, Dolovich MB, Posmituck G, Wong Pack W, Newhouse MT. Pressurized aerosol versus jet aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 440-444 [Medline].
32.
Smaldone GC.
Aerosolized bronchodilators in the intensive care unit: much
ado about nothing?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
159:
1029-1030
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. K. Patel, S. Malish, and C.-F. Chang USE OF INTERMITTENT HELIOX IN INTUBATED ASTHMATICS: ARE WE THERE YET? Chest Meeting Abstracts, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 693a - 694. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Dolovich, R. C. Ahrens, D. R. Hess, P. Anderson, R. Dhand, J. L. Rau, G. C. Smaldone, and G. Guyatt Device Selection and Outcomes of Aerosol Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 335 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Kass Heliox Redux Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 673 - 676. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Martinon-Torres, A. Rodriguez-Nunez, J. M. Martinon-Sanchez, J. Ball, M. Grounds, A. Waddell, K. Evans, J. E. Weber, and M. Rosenthal Heliox Questions Pediatrics, February 1, 2003; 111(2): 441 - 443. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Goldstein, F. Wallet, A. Nicolas-Robin, F. Ferrari, C.-H. Marquette, and J.-J. Rouby Lung Deposition and Efficiency of Nebulized Amikacin during Escherichia coli Pneumonia in Ventilated Piglets Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2002; 166(10): 1375 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Kress, I. Noth, B. K. Gehlbach, N. Barman, A. S. Pohlman, A. Miller, S. Morgan, and J. B. Hall The Utility of Albuterol Nebulized with Heliox during Acute Asthma Exacerbations Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2002; 165(9): 1317 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |