help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by STEWART, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by STEWART, G. J.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 162, Number 5, November 2000, 1851-1854

Incidence of Tuberculosis among a Cohort of Tuberculin-Positive Refugees in Australia
Reappraising the Estimates of Risk

GUY B. MARKS, JUN BAI, SHEILA E. SIMPSON, ELIZABETH A. SULLIVAN, and GREGORY J. STEWART

South Western Sydney Area Health Service, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, University of Sydney, School of Paediatrics, University of New South Wales, and Central Sydney Area Health Service, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Estimates of the lifetime risk of tuberculosis have varied widely and may not be applicable in all current settings. The aim of this study was to measure the incidence of reactivation of latent tuberculosis in a cohort of 15,489 predominantly Southeast Asian refugees aged 12 yr and over who arrived in Sydney, Australia during the period 1984 to 1994 and who had a clear chest X-ray on arrival. Tuberculin skin test (TST) reaction size and the presence of a BCG scar were recorded at entry. Incident cases of tuberculosis, occurring before June 1998, were identified by record linkage analysis with confirmatory review of case notes. There were 122 cases of tuberculosis over an average 10.3 yr of follow-up (crude annual incidence, 76.2/100,000). There was a linear increase in risk with increasing TST reaction size above 10 mm. The risk, and the relation of risk to TST reaction size, were unrelated to BCG scar status. Among those whose initial TST reaction was >=  15 mm, the annual incidence rate in the first 3 yr was 213 (95% CI, 150 to 300) per 100,000 person-years and in the subsequent 10 yr the rate averaged 122 (95% CI, 90 to 165) per 100,000 person-years. The observed rates are similar to those estimated in the general population of the United States in the 1950s and 1960s. Further data on the prognosis of tuberculosis and the effects of isoniazid preventive therapy in Southeast Asian migrants to Western countries are required to inform policy and practice for the prevention of tuberculosis in this population.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Published recommendations for the administration of preventive therapy to individuals with a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) and a clear chest X-ray, who have not had recent exposure to a known source case, are based on assessment of the size of the TST reaction, the prior probability of infection, the likelihood of disease progression or reactivation, and the risks of adverse effects arising from the administration of preventive therapy (1). However, there is evidence to suggest that the practice of administration of preventive therapy in this setting varies (4, 5).

The variation in practice may stem, at least in part, from uncertainty about the contemporary relevance of the data on which these recommendations are based. A number of decision analyses have been undertaken to integrate information on risk of tuberculosis, case fatality rate for tuberculosis, effectiveness of isoniazid chemoprophylaxis, risk of isoniazid-induced hepatitis, and case fatality rate for isoniazid-induced hepatitis (6). Although the conclusions of these analyses differ in important respects because of differences in some of these assumptions, the tuberculosis incidence rates used for most of these analyses are those estimated from discrete populations in Georgia and Alabama by Comstock and Edwards (10). However, there are substantial differences among populations in the reported incidence of tuberculosis in TST-positive persons. Comstock and Edward's population subgroup-specific estimates ranged from 35 to 104 per 100,000 per year (10). Other estimates vary even more widely (8, 12).

BCG vaccination further complicates the interpretation of tuberculin testing for decisions on preventive therapy. Both the relation between TST reaction size and the likelihood of tuberculosis infection and the relation between tuberculosis infection and the risk of subsequent active disease may be influenced by the presence of a BCG vaccination scar.

Australia has one of the lowest rates of tuberculosis in the world: 5.4 per 100,000 persons per year (15). Migrants to Australia probably have a low risk of acquiring tuberculous infection after arrival in Australia (16) and cases arising after migration are likely to represent the reactivation of remotely acquired, latent disease. Several large groups of migrants to Australia have originated from countries with a high incidence of tuberculosis and have been subject to surveillance for tuberculosis after arrival in Australia. It has been common practice not to give preventive therapy to adults and older children with a positive TST and a clear chest X-ray in the absence of a history of recent exposure to a known infectious case. This has given us the opportunity to reexamine existing assumptions about the rates of late reactivation of tuberculosis in people with positive TSTs.

The aim of this study was to estimate the risk or incidence rate for tuberculosis in a general population sample of predominantly Southeast Asian, TST-positive, refugee migrants to Australia. We sought to assess the influence of TST reaction size, presence of a BCG scar, age at migration, and time since migration on the incidence rate for tuberculosis. Assessment of the risk of reactivation of tuberculosis will inform the debate on policy and practice for the administration of preventive therapy in TST-positive migrants from countries with a high incidence of tuberculosis.

    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Cohort

A historical cohort study was conducted among 24,653 refugees who were screened for tuberculosis after arrival in Sydney, Australia during the period 1984 to 1994.

All refugees had a chest X-ray performed before departure for Australia. Those in whom currently or recently active tuberculosis was suspected were commenced on antituberculous drug therapy at that time. Soon after their arrival in New South Wales (NSW) all refugees had further screening for tuberculosis at the Refugee Screening Unit or at the Liverpool Chest Clinic. The results of this initial postmigration screening, which comprised a TST, examination for a BCG scar, and a chest X-ray, were recorded in a log book. TST reaction size was recorded for all reactions >=  10 mm. TST reaction sizes in the range 0 to 9 mm were recorded as "negative." Chest X-rays were recorded as "satisfactory," that is, demonstrating no pleural or parenchymal abnormality, or "not satisfactory."

To exclude those refugees who may have had chemotherapy or preventive therapy for tuberculosis, the cohort for this study was limited to those refugees who were not receiving treatment for tuberculosis and were aged 12 yr and over at the time of initial screening in Australia. The cohort was further limited to those whose chest X-rays at the time of postarrival screening were classified as satisfactory. Refugees meeting these criteria would not have been prescribed preventive therapy by the physician responsible for the refugee screening program during the study period (C. M. Mukerjee, personal communication). However, as there are no comprehensive data available on the administration of prior antituberculous drug therapy, this possibility cannot be excluded for all subjects.

Tuberculosis Notification Data

Cases of tuberculosis arising in the cohort were identified from among those who were notified to the NSW Department of Health Infectious Diseases Surveillance System and its predecessor, the Tuberculosis Register, during the period 1984 to 1998.

Matching Screening and Notification Databases

Members of the cohort who were notified as cases of tuberculosis during the study period were identified by a record linkage analysis using a database of screened refugees and a database of notified cases of tuberculosis (17). A computer-generated search was used to identify records with an identical date of birth in the two databases. These pairs of records were then manually checked for similar names, sex, country of origin, and date of arrival. A further search, based on the surnames and given names, identified a small number of additional matching records with differing dates of birth. These differences appeared to be due to recording errors or incomplete dates. A further computer-generated search based on date of arrival did not identify any additional cases.

Specificity of the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Notified Cases

We reviewed notification data, case notes, and X-ray films of the notified cases of tuberculosis identified from the refugee cohort in order to confirm or refute the diagnosis of active tuberculosis. The diagnosis of active tuberculosis was accepted if any of the following were recorded (17):

1. Positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis

2. Positive direct smear for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), and the patient was not notified as "atypical"

3. Histopathological report of caseating granulomas or findings "consistent with TB"

4. Radiological pulmonary infiltrate that regressed after antituberculosis drug treatment

5. A positive TST, clinical features of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, and response to treatment

Integrity of the Cohort in 1998

To be certain that cases of tuberculosis arising in this cohort would have been reported to the NSW Department of Health, we sought to confirm that the members of the cohort were predominantly alive and living in NSW throughout the study period. We attempted to trace the current location of 200 cohort members selected at random from the study population.

Data Analysis

Incidence rates were calculated per person-years of follow-up. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals around the estimated rates were calculated according to the asymptotic method of Fleiss (18).

Subject age at arrival was classified into quartiles. TST reaction size was classified as negative (< 10 mm), 10-14, 15-19, 20-29, or 30 mm and over. The effects of age, TST reaction size, the presence of a BCG scar, and the interactions among these variables were tested by logistic regression.

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the South Western Sydney Area Health Service and the NSW Department of Health.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Description of the Cohort

The study population comprised 15,489 subjects, which represented 84.3% of all refugees aged more than 12 yr at initial screening. Eighty-six percent of this population originated from Southeast Asia (Vietnam, 67.5%; Cambodia, 10.5%; and Laos, 7.8%) and 12.9% came from Central and South America (El Salvador, 6.3%; and Chile, 3.9%). The remaining 1.3% came from other countries in the Middle East, Europe, and Africa.

The members of this study population were young: the median age was 27 yr, with an interquartile range of 20 to 33 yr. Fifty-eight percent of the cohort were male. A BCG scar was identified in 53.3% of the cohort and the TST was read as positive in 57.7%, including 51% of those with no visible BCG scar and 63% of those with a BCG scar. No TST result was recorded for 505 (3.3%) members of the study population.

Integrity of the Cohort

Of 200 randomly selected members of the original cohort, we were able to establish the whereabouts of 181. Of these, 171 (85.5% of 200) were confirmed as living in New South Wales in 1998.

Incidence of Tuberculosis

The mean duration of follow-up to June 1998 or to the time of diagnosis of tuberculosis was 10.3 yr.

There were 151 notified cases of tuberculosis among members of the study cohort. Of these, 122 (81%) were confirmed as cases of tuberculosis. Eighty-six cases were confirmed on the basis of a positive culture for M. tuberculosis. Another nine cases had positive direct smears for AFBs and were not notified as atypical. A further 10 cases had histopathological findings consistent with tuberculosis. In 12 cases the diagnosis was based on clearing of a radiological infiltrate during treatment for tuberculosis. Finally, five extrapulmonary cases were diagnosed on the basis of typical clinical features, a positive TST, and a positive response to treatment. In total, 41 (34%) of the confirmed cases were extrapulmonary including 32 cases of tuberculous lymphadenitis.

The crude annual incidence of tuberculosis in this cohort was 76.2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 63.5 to 91.3) per 100,000 person-years. Figure 1 shows that the incidence of tuberculosis was greatest in the first 3 yr after migration, during which time the average annual incidence was 112 (95% CI, 85 to 148) per 100,000 person-years. The rate subsequently decreased and over the next 10 yr averaged 66 (95% CI, 52 to 84) per 100,000 person-years. Among those whose initial TST reaction was 15 mm or greater, the annual incidence rate in the first 3 yr was 213 (95% CI, 150 to 300) per 100,000 person-years and in the subsequent 10 yr the rate averaged 122 (95% CI, 90 to 165) per 100,000 person-years.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Annual incidence of tuberculosis (95% confidence interval) by years since arrival in Australia.

The annual incidence rates for tuberculosis ranged from fewer than 40 per 100,000 among those whose initial TST reaction was read as negative, to more than 200 per 100,000 among those with strongly positive TST reactions (Table 1). The effect of TST reaction size on risk of tuberculosis was not affected by the presence of a BCG scar (Table 2). There was a significant linear trend for increased risk of tuberculosis with increasing TST reaction size category (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1

ANNUAL INCIDENCE RATES* FOR TUBERCULOSIS AMONG  REFUGEES MORE THAN 12 yr OF AGE  BY TST REACTION  SIZE AND BCG SCAR, NEW SOUTH WALES, 1984 TO 1998

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 2

EFFECT OF AGE GROUP, TST REACTION SIZE, BCG  SCAR STATUS, AND INTERACTIONS AMONG THESE ON THE RISK OF TUBERCULOSIS*

There was no significant linear trend in the risk of tuberculosis across the age quartiles (Table 2).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this cohort of predominantly Southeast Asian refugees who arrived in Sydney, Australia during the period 1984 to 1994, the annual incidence of tuberculosis, over an average period of 10 yr of follow-up, was 76 per 100,000. The risk of subsequent tuberculosis was related to size of the TST reaction on arrival but was not influenced by the presence of a BCG scar.

This cohort represents a uniquely valuable population in which to study reactivation of latent tuberculosis. Over a period of 4 to 14 yr after the identification of infection and exclusion of existing active pulmonary disease by chest X-ray, the members of this cohort have been living in a country with one of the lowest tuberculosis incidence rates in the world. Although it is possible that transmission and hence reinfection has occurred in Australia, or during visits back to their country of origin, the former has probably been even less common in the Sydney environment than it was in San Francisco (19). There is anecdotal evidence that Vietnamese refugees in Australia were reluctant to travel to back to Vietnam before 1993, although many have visited since that time.

The other strength of this study is the sensitivity and specificity of case ascertainment. There is evidence that the great majority of patients treated for tuberculosis in NSW have been notified to the Department of Health and will have been identified as cases in our study (20, 21). This is, in part, attributable to the fact that tuberculosis treatment (for all ages and for all sites) is given free of charge through chest clinics in NSW. The validity of this database as a complete, and hence sensitive, record of cases of tuberculosis occurring in NSW is supported by the observation that recent intensified surveillance, including tracing through records of sale of antituberculous drugs, did not result in any detectable increase in the notification rate. The specificity of the diagnosis of tuberculosis cases in this analysis was enhanced by review of case records of notified cases and reassessment of the diagnosis based on criteria. Finally, the finding that the cohort has remained intact, within New South Wales, during the period of follow-up supports the likelihood of complete ascertainment of incident cases.

Our finding that there was a significant linear trend in incidence of tuberculosis with increasing TST reaction size was expected. The analysis of this relation is limited by the method of recording TST reaction size in these subjects. All reactions < 10 mm were simply classed as "negative." It is likely that some of the cases arising in TST-"negative" subjects were, in fact, attributable to prior infection. These cases would include those whose TST reaction size was between 5 and 9 mm, at least some of whom would be infected, and others who were anergic at the time of initial screening due to deprivation in the refugee camps or during their travel to Australia.

We found that the presence or absence of a BCG scar did not alter the relation between TST reaction size and risk of subsequent tuberculosis. Although this study was not designed to assess the effectiveness of BCG vaccination in preventing tuberculosis, our finding is consistent with the conclusions of two meta-analyses: that BCG administered in childhood is not effective in preventing tuberculosis in adults (22, 23). It also supports the view that, after a prolonged interval, BCG does not influence TST reaction size (24, 25).

The disease incidence rates for subjects with 10- to 20-mm TST reactions in this cohort were similar to those reported in the Comstock and Edwards analysis (10), although lower than reported in other settings (8, 12, 26).

It is possible, with some assumptions, to estimate the lifetime risk of tuberculosis for a member of this refugee cohort. The observed annual incidence rate for a member of the cohort with a TST reaction >=  15 mm was 213 per 100,000 for the first 3 yr and 122 per 100,000 for the following 10 yr. Hence, for a 25 yr old, the expected cumulative incidence to age 38 yr is 1,859 per 100,000 (1.86%). If we assume, based approximately on the data from Comstock and Edwards (10), that the latter incidence rate applies to age 50 yr and that the rate increases by 50% (i.e., to 183 per 100,000) for the period from age 50 to 75 yr, then the cumulative incidence to age 75 yr would be 7.8%. Applying similar assumptions to a 35 yr old with a > 15-mm TST reaction, the cumulative risk to age 75 yr is 6.7%. These estimates of lifetime cumulative risk of tuberculosis are slightly higher than the lifetime risk estimates calculated by Comstock and Edwards (10).

The application of these risk estimates to the task of bridging the gap between practice and policy on the administration of preventive therapy in this context requires reanalysis of the decision trees referred to above. While this study has shown that previous estimates of lifetime risk for tuberculosis are applicable in this population, the other inputs into this decision require re-estimation in the Southeast Asian migrants. In particular, the influence of the relatively high prevalence of isoniazid resistance observed in some Southeast Asian countries on the effectiveness of isoniazid chemoprophylaxis is not known. At least some failures of prevention could be expected due to isoniazid resistance (27). Further, the risk of isoniazid-induced hepatitis and other adverse effects, the case fatality rates for tuberculosis and hepatitis, and risk of transmission of infection before diagnosis and treatment have not been established in this population. It is likely that, in a community such as ours, which is well serviced with primary health care and in which treatment for tuberculosis is directly observed, delays in diagnosis and fatalities will be less than previously estimated.

This is the first study to have examined the incidence of reactivation of latent tuberculosis in a population of predominantly Southeast Asian refugees living in an environment where reinfection rates are almost certainly very low. The observed rates are similar to those estimated in the general population of the United States in the 1950s and 1960s. We have confirmed that the risk increases with TST reaction size and that, in this cohort of adults and older children, it is independent of BCG vaccination status. Further data on the prognosis of tuberculosis and the effects of isoniazid preventive therapy in Southeast Asian migrants to Australia and similar countries are required to inform policy and practice for the prevention of tuberculosis in this population.

    Footnotes

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Guy B. Marks, Ph.D., Chest Clinic, Liverpool Health Service, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC NSW 1871, Australia. E-mail: g.marks{at}unsw.edu.au.

(Received in original form April 14, 2000 and in revised form June 29, 2000).

Acknowledgments: Data on tuberculosis notifications were supplied by the New South Wales Department of Health. The authors thank Dr. C. M. Mukerjee, who was the physician at the Liverpool Chest Clinic during the period in which baseline investigations were performed on the refugees who form the cohort reported here.

Supported by the Community Health and Anti-tuberculosis Association of New South Wales (CHATA).

    References
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. American Thoracic Society. Targeted tuberculin and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221-S247.

2. Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Chemotherapy and management of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: recommendations. Thorax 1998;53:536-548.

3. NSW Health Department. Controlling tuberculosis in New South Wales. Sydney, Australia: NSW Health Department; 1994.

4. MacIntyre C, Plant A, Yung A, Streeton J. Missed opportunities for prevention of tuberculosis in Victoria, Australia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997; 2: 345-347 .

5. Geisler P, Nelson K, Crispen R. Tuberculosis in physicians: compliance with preventive measures. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135: 3-9 [Medline].

6. Colice G. Decision analysis, public health policy, and isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for young adult tuberculin skin reactors. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 2517-2522 [Abstract].

7. Jordan T, Lewit E, Reichman L. Isoniazid preventive therapy for tuberculosis. Decision analysis considering ethnicity and gender. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144: 1357-1360 [Medline].

8. Rose D, Schecter C, Silver A. The age threshold for isoniazid chemoprophylaxis: a decision analysis for low-risk tuberculin reactors. JAMA 1986; 256: 2709-2713 [Abstract].

9. Tsevat J, Taylor W, Wong J, Pauker S. Isoniazid for the tuberculin reactor: take it or leave it. Am Rev Respir Dis 1998; 137: 215-220 .

10. Comstock G, Edwards P. The competing risks of tuberculosis and hepatitis for adult tuberculin reactors. Am Rev Respir Dis 1975; 111: 573-577 [Medline].

11. Taylor W, Aronson M, Delblanco T. Should young adults with a positive tuberculin test take isoniazid? Ann Intern Med 1981; 94: 808-813 .

12. Horwitz O, Magnus K. Epidemiologic evaluation of chemoprophylaxis against tuberculosis: twelve years follow-up of a community-wide controlled trial with special reference to sampling method. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 99: 333-342 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

13. Comstock G, Ferebee S, Hammes L. A controlled trial of community-wide isoniazid prophylaxis in Alaska. Am Rev Respir Dis 1967; 95: 935 [Medline].

14. Horwitz O, Wilbek E, Erickson P. Epidemiological basis of tuberculosis eradication: longitudinal studies on the risk of tuberculosis in the general population in a low prevalence area. Bull World Health Organ 1969; 41: 95-113 [Medline].

15. Gilroy N. Tuberculosis notifications in Australia, 1997.  Commun Dis Intell 1999; 23: 337-347 . [Medline]

16. Alperstein G, Fett M, Reznik R, Thomas M, Senthil M. The prevalence of tuberculosis infection among year 8 schoolchildren in inner Sydney in 1992.  Med J Aust 1994; 160: 197-201 [Medline].

17. Bai J, Marks G, Stewart G, Simpson S, Sullivan E. Specificity for notification of tuberculosis among screened refugees in NSW. Aust NZ J Public Health 1999; 23: 410-413 . [Medline]

18. Fleiss J. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981. p. 14-15.

19. Chin D, DeRiemer K, Small P, Ponce de Leon A, Steinhart R, Schecter G, Daley C, Moss A, Paz E, Jasmer R, Agasino C, Hopewell P. Differences in contributing factors to tuberculosis incidence in U.S.-born and foreign-born persons. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1797-1803 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

20. Stewart G. The incidence of tuberculosis in the southern metropolitan region of Sydney, NSW 1976-1986. Master's treatise. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney; 1990.

21. Plant A, Christopher P, Richards G, et al . The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a TB threat? Med J Aust 1988; 148: 609-615 [Medline].

22. Sterne J, Rodrigues L, Guedes I. Does the efficacy of BCG decline with time since vaccination? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998; 2: 200-207 [Medline].

23. Colditz G, Brewer T, Berkey C, Wilson M, Burdick E, Fineberg H, Mosteller F. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA 1994; 271: 698-702 [Abstract].

24. Sutter R, Haefliger E. Tuberculosis morbidity and infection in Vietnamese in southeast Asian refugee camps. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 1483-1486 [Medline].

25. Johnson J, Lee B, Doherty E, Kelly E, McDonnell T. Tuberculin sensitivity and the BCG scar in tuberculosis contacts. Tuberc Lung Dis 1995; 76: 122-125 [Medline].

26. Ferebee S. Long-term effects of isoniazid prophylaxis. Bull Int Union Tuber 1968; 41: 161-166 .

27. Nolan C, Aitken M, Elarth A, Anderson K, Miller W. Active tuberculosis after isoniazid chemoprophylaxis of Southeast Asian refugees. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133: 431-436 [Medline].





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. L. Fernando, B. M. Saunders, R. Sluyter, K. K. Skarratt, H. Goldberg, G. B. Marks, J. S. Wiley, and W. J. Britton
A Polymorphism in the P2X7 Gene Increases Susceptibility to Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2007; 175(4): 360 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. C. Taylor, J. Tsevat, S. G. Pauker, M. Charles, K. Y. Rhee, G. B. Marks, W. J. Britton, and C. R. Horsburgh Jr.
Priorities for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis
N. Engl. J. Med., August 19, 2004; 351(8): 832 - 834.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Tuberculosis, Lung Infections, and Interstitial Lung Disease in AJRCCM 2000
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): 1774 - 1788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
G. B. Marks, J. Bai, G. J. Stewart, S. E. Simpson, E. A. Sullivan, and Fafphm
Effectiveness of Postmigration Screening in Controlling Tuberculosis Among Refugees: A Historical Cohort Study, 1984-1998
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2001; 91(11): 1797 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by STEWART, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by STEWART, G. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2000 American Thoracic Society