help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAYDAY, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by RAMSBURG, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAYDAY, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by RAMSBURG, E.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 162, Number 4, October 2000, S161-S163

gamma delta Cells and the Regulation of Mucosal Immune Responses

ADRIAN C. HAYDAY, SCOTT ROBERTS, and ELIZABETH RAMSBURG

Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Medical School, University of London, London, United Kingdom; and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology and Section of Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

We are only now uncovering the potentially important contributions made to immune responses by gamma delta cells. These contributions are likely to be particularly important at mucosal sites, where gamma delta cells are disproportionately enriched. Indeed, gamma delta cells have proven biological activity in the lung. In addition, gamma delta cells are also enriched in young rather than adult animals. Studies of mutant mice have demonstrated that alpha beta T cells are seemingly essential for high-affinity, cognate immunological memory, whereas gamma delta cells contribute to the early stages of an immune response and to the regulation of alpha beta T cell- and B cell-mediated immunity. To explore further the role of gamma delta cells in immune responses, we have investigated whether their contribution is greater during the early period of life, when the cells are more abundant. In a natural system of coccidial infection of gut epithelial cells, we find that alpha beta T cell responses are less essential for immunoprotection during primary challenge of young mice than is true for adult animals. This "ineffectiveness" creates a "window of importance" for the immunoprotective capacity of gamma delta cells, which seem thereby to be more crucial in young compared with older animals. The relative ineffectiveness of alpha beta T cells in young mice may be attributable to a bias toward Th2 activity. We therefore hypothesize that gamma delta cell activity, elicited by infection early in life, may compensate for defects in Th1 activity and may actually accelerate the bias in alpha beta T cells away from Th2. This has obvious implications for susceptibility to Th2-type allergic responses.

    gamma delta CELLS AND THE LUNG
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

gamma delta cells share with B cells and alpha beta T cells the property of using somatic gene rearrangement to generate diverse surface antigen receptors. Nonetheless, while we are confident of the contributions made to protective immunity by B cells and by alpha beta T cells, the case remains enigmatic for gamma delta cells (1).

By analysis of gamma delta cell dynamics, and studies of gamma delta cell-deficient mice, gamma delta cells have been implicated in immune responses to numerous infectious and noninfectious challenges. Thus, in the lung, interleukin 4 (IL-4) production by gamma delta cells was claimed to be essential in a murine model of airway hyperresponsiveness (2). Paradoxically, gamma delta cells have also been reported to downregulate airway hyperresponsiveness, independent of alpha beta T cell-mediated events (3). Strikingly, gamma delta cell-deficient mice are fatally defective in their immune response to Nocardia, a gram-positive bacterium delivered to the lung by aerosol. The failure appeared to involve an insufficient mobilization of neutrophils (4). Neutrophils also respond to ozone-treatment of animals. gamma delta cell-deficient animals likewise succumbed to exaggerated damage induced by ozone (4).

These several reports indicate that gamma delta cells are relevant to the biology of the lung, at least as explored in mouse models. Moreover, the results reported can be reconciled to some extent with documented specificities and effector functions of gamma delta cells.

    gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND ANTIGEN SAMPLING
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

The gamma delta T cell receptor (TCR) resembles immunoglobulin and TCRalpha beta in presenting a series of solvent-exposed loops supported by two beta  sheets (5). The variability in putative CDR3 is greater than that in TCRalpha beta (6) and CDR1/2 are strikingly diverged among different gamma delta TCRs within a species (1, 6). This is consistent with the evidence that gamma delta cells, unlike alpha beta T cells, are not "locked in" to recognition of peptide plus MHC (7). In support of this are additional data that gamma delta cells are usually CD4-CD8-, and hence unable to exploit the capacity of CD8 and CD4 to coengage (with the TCR) MHC class I and class II antigens, respectively.

Some antigen specificities of some subsets of gamma delta cells have been elucidated. Thus, human peripheral blood gamma delta cells recognize low molecular mass mycobacterial products, for example, ethylamine, and isopentenyl pyrophosphate, which is also produced by actively growing mammalian cells (8). The mechanism by which gamma delta cells recognize these products is unelucidated. Indeed, although there can be high sequence diversity in TCRgamma delta , it is not evident how antigens of any great diversity can be sampled. This is because gamma delta cells are seldom found in the conventional T/B zones of the lymph nodes and spleen, respectively, which are the known anatomical sites where diverse antigen can be presented, and the responding, cognate lymphocytes rapidly expanded. Instead, gamma delta cells are commonly found within epithelia, or broadly spread throughout secondary lymphoid organs such as the spleen. This is true even in animals, such as young cattle, where > 75% of CD3+ cells may comprise CD4-CD8- gamma delta cells (1).

Because of the potential difficulty in sampling antigen, and based on experimental data that gamma delta cells could respond to MHC class I structures (11), it was proposed that the cells might recognize class Ib MHC molecules, expressed as sentinels of cell stress or infection (12). Data supporting this come from evidence that human gut gamma delta cells recognize MICA (MHC class I chain-related protein A) (13), and that a significant subset of murine splenic gamma delta cells recognizes T10/T22 (14). Both products are expressed by activated cells, epithelial cells, and lymphoid cells (14, 15). These data establish that gamma delta cells have the potential to recognize and effect function toward activated epithelial cells and lymphoid cells. This has been confirmed by tissue culture experiments (13, 16).

    gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

Diverse effector functions have been attributed to gamma delta cells. For example, helper T cell type 1 (Th1) and Th2 clones have been characterized, and shown to support the production of the respective classes of immunoglobulin (Ig) in vivo (18). This activity is heightened in alpha beta T cell-deficient mice, with high titers of IgE supported by gamma delta cell activity. This appears to be exaggerated on particular genetic backgrounds (M. Girardi, A. C. Hayday, and R. E. Tigelaar, unpublished data). Mucosal IgA synthesis is low in gamma delta -deficient mice (19). In short, the localization of gamma delta cells to tissues appears to be paralleled by their capacity to support the production of "body surface" Ig. These data demonstrate the potential of gamma delta cells to be major contributors to mucosal B cell responses.

In contrast to CD4+ alpha beta T cells, gamma delta cells are usually biased away from Th2 and toward Th1 and the production of interferon gamma  (IFN-gamma ). In addition, gamma delta intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) are reported to produce active fibroblast growth factor VII (FGFVII), which can promote the growth and differentiation of epithelial cells (20). Paradoxically, they can also be cytolytic toward epithelial cells (13) and may express granulysin. In summary, gamma delta cells display varied effector functions and the phenotype manifested by gamma delta cell activity (or deficiency) will most likely vary according to the nature of the stimulus, the genetics of the animal, and the stage of the animal's development.

    gamma delta CELLS REGULATE IMMUNOPATHOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

To assess the contribution of gamma delta cells to mucosal immune responses, our laboratory has focused on the use of Eimeria vermiformis, a natural coccidian pathogen of the mouse gut (21). Such parasites are abundant, infecting mucosal epithelial cells in a wide range of vertebrates. The strength of an infection is readily measured by counting oocysts released into fecal pellets over a period of from 1 to 2 wk postinfection. On rechallenge, immunocompetent animals are highly resistant, even to significantly higher inocula.

Eimeria infection of alpha beta T cell-deficient mice revealed a marked susceptibility to primary infection, and a failure to develop immunity to rechallenge (22). The effector role of alpha beta T cells is probably mediated by IFN-gamma -producing, Th1 cells. In contrast, TCRdelta -/- mice showed no defects in either parameter (22). Such negligible contribution of gamma delta cells to protective immunity has been observed in numerous infections. Nonetheless, TCRdelta -/- mice show an exaggerated immunopathology, attributable to the action of alpha beta T cells (22). Whether this reflects a capacity of gamma delta cells directly to regulate alpha beta T cell activity or whether, via the action of FGFVII, gamma delta cells ordinarily protect the epithelium, is not currently resolved. It has been considered that in the absence of FGFVII from gamma delta cells, epithelial homeostasis is dysregulated in health and disease (1).

Such dysregulated immunopathology has been reported for several other infections of TCRdelta -/- mice (1). Interestingly, gamma delta cells can also respond to and limit inflammatory damage elicited by noninfectious agents (23). Indeed, the spontaneous, autoreactive hyperresponsiveness of T cells that leads to lupus- and nephritis-type symptoms in MRL/lpr mice is exaggerated when crossed onto the TCRdelta -/- background (24). By 24 wk, mortality rates for delta -/- MRL/lpr mice were ~ 67% compared with ~ 25% for gamma delta + MRL/lpr mice (24). These data demonstrate incontrovertibly that a defect in gamma delta cell immunoregulatory function can reduce life span, contingent on an appropriate genetic background.

    AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR gamma delta CELLS: A HYPOTHESIS
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

Nonetheless, the general importance of an immunoregulatory role for gamma delta cells in adult animals is as yet unclear. In addition, such immunoregulation may not represent the primary role of gamma delta cells, just as immunoregulation is not the primary role of alpha beta T cells. Indeed, in preadolescent members of several species, gamma delta cells outnumber alpha beta T cells, the putative targets of regulation. Hence, we further examined the Eimeria system for more overt immunoprotective gamma delta cell function.

First, we compared the susceptibility to infection of adult TCRbeta -/- mice with that of TCR(beta  × delta )-/- mice that lack all T cells. The latter were even more susceptible than the former, indicating that gamma delta cells respond to the infection, and can contribute to pathogen clearance, even though they are not required in alpha beta T cell-competent animals (22). gamma delta cells appear biased toward Th1 activity and IFN-gamma production (1). Interestingly, IFN-gamma -/- mice were as susceptible as TCR(beta  × delta )-/- mice, supporting the hypothesis that gamma delta cells contribute an antipathogenic effect via production of IFN-gamma . The question, therefore, was whether there might be a set of conditions under which this or a related activity of gamma delta cells might be more obviously critical to the health of the host.

gamma delta cells are disproportionately abundant in young animals, between birth and adolescence. Remarkably, studies of humans and mice indicate that during this ontogenetic period, alpha beta T cells are extremely Th2 biased. To test whether this context placed greater reliance on gamma delta cells for immunoprotection, Eimeria infections were repeated in young mice, before, at, or shortly after weaning. In complete contrast to adult mice, TCRbeta -/- mice now showed little or no increased susceptibility to primary infection. Rather, an increased susceptibility was commonly shown by TCRdelta -/- mice (E. Ramsburg, S. J. Roberts, and A. C. Hayday, unpublished data). We therefore believe that the responsiveness and immunoprotective potential of gamma delta cells may be especially important in young animals. This may be particularly true for animals, such as chickens, that do not receive transplacental maternal immunoglobulin, and in which gamma delta cell numbers are particularly high.

Interestingly, when young mice were rechallenged with Eimeria only the alpha beta T cell-deficient animals failed to show immunity. Hence, alpha beta T cells are not "ignorant" of the initial challenge, and although they fail to make an obvious contribution to the primary response, they clearly establish a memory pool. Possibly these events accelerate the ontogenetic development of Th1 activity in the alpha beta T cell pool (Figure 1).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Hypothesis for involvement of gamma delta cells in "infection-based immunoregulation" in young animals.

    SUMMARY
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

gamma delta cells have been retained as a component of the tripartite lymphocyte system (alpha beta T cells, B cells, and gamma delta cells) for more than 500 million years. This suggests a strong selective pressure for their retention. At the same time, gamma delta cells are represented to different degrees in different species: high in ungulates, in chickens, and in intestinal repertoires of mice; low in humans and in the system circulation of mice. Nonetheless, in all vertebrates in which gamma delta cells have been studied, the cells are disproportionately abundant in young animals, and at body surfaces. In seeking a property of gamma delta cells that might satisfy all these points, we have found evidence that gamma delta cells may be important for controlling primary infections in young animals, prior to alpha beta T cells assuming this role.

We do not yet know the breadth of pathogens to which this hypothesis may apply. But somewhat similar data were obtained in studies of Cryptosporidium infection of young versus adult mice (25). In that case, gamma delta T cell-deficient animals showed a defect in immunoprotection only during the early phases of infections of very young mice. This is entirely consistent with our findings. Nonetheless, alpha beta T cell-deficient mice also showed defects in immunoprotection when infected as young mice, and it is also true that the generally accepted period of susceptibility of mice to Cryptosporidium infection is during the first 4 wk of life. How can this be if gamma delta cells are effective at providing immunoprotection during this period? Possibly the key is in the nature of the infecting organism. Cryptosporidium, unlike Eimeria, is not self-clearing in immunodeficient animals. Therefore, defects in host responsiveness seen in alpha beta T cell-deficient mice after 3 to 4 wk possibly represent a failure of a robust alpha beta T cell memory response to develop. This is consistent with our findings that a long-lasting immunoprotective memory response to Eimeria requires alpha beta T cells, irrespective of the age of infection.

The mechanism of action of gamma delta cells is now under investigation. At least three nonmutually exclusive mechanisms can be considered, based on the effector functions outlined above. The cells may be directly antipathogenic through cytolytic and/or Th1 activities; they may activate antipathogenic activities in other cells, for example, macrophages or neutrophils, via the action of cytokines; and they may protect the survival and growth of healthy epithelial cells, via the production of epithelial growth factors. The antipathogenic role for gamma delta cells in young animals could be of great significance when exposure to the external environment is at its most precipitous and potentially catastrophic. In addition, it is possible that an early skewing toward Th1 responses, driven by gamma delta cells, might accelerate the bias away from Th2 responses and thereby reduce susceptibility to allergy.

    Footnotes

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Adrian C. Hayday, Department of Immunobiology, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' Medical School, Guy's Hospital, New Guy's House, London SE1 9RT, UK. E-mail: adrian. hayday{at}kcl.ac.uk

Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to numerous colleagues, current and past, particularly Adrian Smith (Institute of Animal Health, Compton) and R. Craig Findly (Pfizer, Groton, CT).

Supported by the Wellcome Trust, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dunhill Medical Trust.

    References
TOP
ABSTRACT
gamma delta CELLS AND THE...
gamma delta CELL SPECIFICITIES AND...
gamma delta CELL EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
gamma delta CELLS REGULATE...
AN AGE-DEPENDENT ROLE FOR...
SUMMARY
REFERENCES

1. Hayday, A. C.. 2000. gamma delta cells: a right time and a right place for a conserved third way of protection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18: 975-1026 [Medline].

2. Zuany-Amorim, C., C. Ruffie, S. Haile, B. B. Vargaftig, P. Pereira, and M. M. Pretolani. 1998. Requirement for gamma delta T cells in allergic airway inflammation. Science 280: 1265-1267 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

3. Lahn, M., A. Kanehio, K. Takeda, A. Joetham, J. Schwarze, G. Kohler, R. O'Brien, E. W. Gelfand, and W. Born. 1999. Negative regulation of airway responsiveness that is dependent on gamma delta T cells and independent of alpha beta T cells. Nat. Med. 10: 1150-1156 .

4. King, D. P., D. M. Hyde, K. A. Jackson, D. M. Novosad, T. N. Ellis, L. Putney, M. Y. Stovall, L. S. Van Winkle, B. L. Beaman, and D. A. Ferrick. 1999. Protective response to pulmonary injury requires gamma delta T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. Cutting Edge 162: 5033-5036 .

5. Li, H., M. I. Lebedeva, A. S. Llera, B. A. Fields, M. B. Brenner, and R. A. Mariuzza. 1998. Structure of the Vdelta domain of a human gamma delta T-cell antigen receptor. Nature 391: 502 [Medline].

6. Rock, E. P., P. R. Sibbald, M. M. Davis, and Y.-H. Chien. 1994. CDR3 length in antigen-specific immune receptors. J. Exp. Med. 179: 323-328 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

7. Schild, H., N. Mavaddat, C. Litzenberger, E. W. Ehrlich, M. M. Davis, J. A. Bluestone, L. Matis, R. K. Draper, and Y.-H. Chien. 1994. The nature of major histocompatibility complex recognition by gamma delta T-cells. Cell 76: 29-37 [Medline].

8. Tanaka, Y., C. Morita, E. Nieves, M. B. Brenner, and B. R. Bloom. 1995. Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human gamma delta T cells. Nature 375: 155-158 [Medline].

9. Constant, P., F. Davodeau, M. A. Peyrat, Y. Poquet, G. Puzo, and M. Bonneville. 1994. Stimulation of human gamma -delta T-cells by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands. Science 264: 267-270 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

10. Bukowski, J. F., C. T. Morita, and M. B. Brenner. 1999. Human gamma delta T cells recognise alkylamines derived from microbes, edible plants, tea: implications for innate immunity. Immunity 11: 57-65 [Medline].

11. Jones, B., S. Mjolsness, C. A. Janeway, and A. C. Hayday. 1986. Transcription of functionally rearranged gamma genes in primary T cells of adult immuno-competent mice. Nature 323: 535-538 .

12. Janeway, C. A., B. Jones, and A. C. Hayday. 1988. Specificity and function of cells bearing gamma delta T cell receptors. Immunol. Today 9: 73-76 [Medline].

13. Groh, B., A. Steinle, S. Bauer, and T. Spies. 1998. Recognition of stress-induced MHC molecules by intestinal epithelial gamma delta T cells. Science 279: 1737-1740 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

14. Crowley, M. P., A. M. Fahrer, N. Baumgarth, J. Hampl, I. Gutgemann, L. Teyton, and Y. Chien. 2000. A population of murine gamma delta T cells that recognize an inducible MHC class Ib molecule. Science 287: 314-316 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

15. Steinle, A., B. Groh, and T. Spies. 1998. Diversification, expression and gamma delta T cell recognition of evolutionarily distant members of the MIC family of major histocompatibility class I-related molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 12510-12515 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

16. Havran, W., Y. Chien, and J. Allison. 1991. Recognition of self antigens by skin derived T cells with invariant gamma delta antigen receptors. Science 252: 1430-1432 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

17. Tigelaar, R. E., and J. M. Lewis. 1994. In W. C. Lambert, B. Gianotti and W. V. Bloten, editors. Basic Mechanisms of Physiologic and Aberrant Lymphoproliferation in the Skin. Plenum, New York. 39-55.

18. Wen, L., D. F. Barber, W. Pao, F. S. Wong, M. J. Owen, and A. C. Hayday. 1998. Primary gamma delta cell clones can be defined phenotypically and functionally as Th1/Th2 cells and illustrate the association of CD4 with Th2 differentiation. J. Immunol. 160: 1965-1974 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

19. Fujihashi, K., J. R. McGhee, M. N. Kweon, M. D. Cooper, S. Tonegawa, I. Takahasi, T. Hiroi, J. Mestecky, and H. Kiyono. 1996. gamma delta T cell deficient mice have impaired mucosal immunoglobulin A responses. J. Exp. Med. 183: 1929-1935 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

20. Boismenu, R., and W. Havran. 1994. Modulation of epithelial cell growth by intraepithelial gamma delta T cells. Science 266: 1253-1255 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

21. Findly, R. C., S. J. Roberts, and A. C. Hayday. 1993. Dynamic response of murine gut intraepithelial T cells after infection by the coccidian parasite Eimeria. Eur. J. Immunol. 23: 2557-2564 .

22. Roberts, S. J., A. L. Smith, A. B. West, L. Wen, R. C. Findly, M. J. Owen, and A. C. Hayday. 1996. T-cell alpha beta + and gamma delta + deficient mice display abnormal but distinct phenotypes toward a natural, widespread infection of the intestinal epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 11774-11779 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

23. Mukasa, A., W. Born, and R. L. O'Brien. 1999. Inflammation alone evokes the response of a TCR-invariant mouse gamma delta T cell subset. J. Immunol. 162: 4910-4913 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

24. Peng, S., M. Madaio, A. C. Hayday, and J. Craft. 1996. Progation and regulation of systemic autoimmunity by gamma delta T cells. J. Immunol. 157: 4689-4698 .

25. Waters, W. R., and J. A. Harp. 1996. Cryptosporidium parvum infection in T-cell receptor (TCR)-alpha- and TCR-delta-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 64: 1854-1857 [Abstract].





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. N. Ajuebor, Y. Jin, G. L. Gremillion, R. M. Strieter, Q. Chen, and P. A. Adegboyega
{gamma}{delta}T Cells Initiate Acute Inflammation and Injury in Adenovirus-Infected Liver via Cytokine-Chemokine Cross Talk
J. Virol., October 1, 2008; 82(19): 9564 - 9576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S.-S. J. Sung, S. M. Fu, C. E. Rose Jr., F. Gaskin, S.-T. Ju, and S. R. Beaty
A Major Lung CD103 ({alpha}E)-beta7 Integrin-Positive Epithelial Dendritic Cell Population Expressing Langerin and Tight Junction Proteins
J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2161 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
C. Pilette, S. R. Durham, J.-P. Vaerman, and Y. Sibille
Mucosal Immunity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Role for Immunoglobulin A?
Proceedings of the ATS, April 1, 2004; 1(2): 125 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Holtmeier, J. Kaller, W. Geisel, R. Pabst, W. F. Caspary, and H. J. Rothkotter
Development and Compartmentalization of the Porcine TCR {delta} Repertoire at Mucosal and Extraintestinal Sites: The Pig as a Model for Analyzing the Effects of Age and Microbial Factors
J. Immunol., August 15, 2002; 169(4): 1993 - 2002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Asthma, Airway Biology, and Allergic Rhinitis in AJRCCM 2000
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2001; 164(9): 1559 - 1580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Bassaganya-Riera, R. Hontecillas, D. R. Zimmerman, and M. J. Wannemuehler
Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid Modulates Phenotype and Effector Functions of Porcine CD8+ Lymphocytes
J. Nutr., September 1, 2001; 131(9): 2370 - 2377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAYDAY, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by RAMSBURG, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAYDAY, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by RAMSBURG, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2000 American Thoracic Society