|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Airway and alveolar inflammation have been described in asthma.
Prolonged inflammation may lead to airway remodeling, which can result in physiologic abnormalities. Elderly lifetime nonsmokers are an ideal population in which to examine the consequences
of longstanding asthma. To test the hypothesis that airflow limitation and hyperinflation are associated with the duration of asthma, we evaluated airflow and lung volumes in a cohort of elderly asthmatic individuals. All subjects were > 60 yr of age and were lifetime nonsmokers (n = 75). Patients with asthma of long duration
(LDA; n = 38) had asthma for
26 yr (median = 40.0 yr); patients
with asthma of short duration (SDA; n = 37) had asthma for < 26 yr (median = 9 yr). Patients with LDA had a significantly lower FEV1% predicted than did those with SDA (59.5 ± 2.6% versus 73.8 ± 3.1% [mean ± SEM], respectively; p < 0.007). Regression analysis
demonstrated that duration of asthma was inversely associated
with FEV1% predicted (r = 0.264, p < 0.03). After bronchodilator
administration, the patients with LDA continued to show airflow
obstruction (FEV1% predicted = 65.4 ± 2.9). Only 18% of patients
with LDA attained a normal postbronchodilator FEV1, whereas
50% of those with SDA were able to do so (p < 0.003). The FRC%
predicted was significantly higher in subjects with LDA than in
those with SDA (142.9 ± 5.6 versus 124.1 ± 4.4, respectively, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis revealed an association between FRC and duration of asthma that was independent of the
degree of airflow limitation. These data suggest that the duration
of asthma is associated with the degree of airflow limitation and
hyperinflation. Moreover, these abnormalities can become irreversible over time, and may reflect distal airway and/or parenchymal changes as well as proximal airway remodeling.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Airway inflammation is widely accepted as the central mechanism in the pathogenesis of asthma (1). Inflammation in the distal airways and parenchyma has also been described in asthma (2, 3). It has been hypothesized that over time, recurrent injury and repair resulting from chronic airway inflammation lead to distortion and remodeling of bronchial architecture (4, 5). Airway remodeling is characterized by increased subepithelial matrix deposition with a shift in collagen components, hypertrophy and hyperplasia of airway smooth muscle, mucus gland hyperplasia, and vascular proliferation (6, 7). Although some of these changes may occur early in the disease process (8, 9), the long-term effects of persistent airway and alveolar inflammation remain poorly described. The airways of elderly subjects who have had persistent asthma for decades are likely candidates for airway remodeling. Because the duration of asthma in the elderly can range from several months to many decades, this is an ideal population in which to study the relationship between the duration of asthma and airway or parenchymal remodeling.
Characterization of asthma in the elderly is complicated by difficulty in differentiating asthma from other forms of chronic obstructive lung disease (10). Cigarette smoking is a major diagnostic confounder in this population, and published descriptions of asthma in the elderly are derived from cohorts that include smokers (11). Because of the confounding effects of tobacco use, it is unclear whether these descriptions are of asthma or of a heterogeneous group of obstructive lung diseases that may be pathophysiologically distinct from asthma. In order for a population of elderly asthmatic individuals to serve as a model in which to study the natural history of asthma, the confounding effects of tobacco use must be eliminated.
The consequences of longstanding asthma in elderly lifetime nonsmokers have not been well described. Because of the inherent risks of invasive studies in this cohort, we assessed physiologic outcomes as surrogate measures of underlying airway structural changes. We hypothesized that longstanding asthma would result in irreversible airflow limitation and hyperinflation, and that the severity of these abnormalities would correlate with the duration of disease. In this study we describe airflow, static lung volumes, and bronchodilator responsiveness in a well-characterized cohort of elderly lifetime nonsmokers with asthma from the Bellevue Hospital Primary Care Asthma Clinic (BHPCAC) in New York City.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
All subjects who were enrolled in the BHPCAC between 1991 and 1998, and who had completed a data-base questionnaire (n = 2,112), were evaluated for entry into the study. The BHPCAC, located in a municipal hospital in New York City, serves an indigent urban population. Subjects were eligible for inclusion in the study if they were 60 yr of age or older and had a physician diagnosis of asthma based on the National Institute of Health/National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NIH/NAEPP) guidelines (n = 235) (18). Only lifetime nonsmokers, defined as those subjects who reported zero pack-years of cigarette use, were enrolled in the study (n = 114). Subjects who did not complete baseline and postbronchodilator spirometry were excluded from analysis (n = 38). One patient was excluded because the age of onset of asthma was unknown.
A total of 75 subjects were included in the analysis. Baseline data
on demographic characteristics, tobacco use, and clinical features of
asthma were obtained from the BHPCAC database questionnaire, a
validated instrument completed upon entry into the clinic. Information obtained from the data base was confirmed by chart review. Age of onset of asthma was determined by subjects' own report of their age at the time of initial physician diagnosis of asthma or onset of
symptoms, whichever occurred earlier. Duration of asthma was calculated from the age of onset. The median duration of asthma among
the study subjects was 26 yr. The median was used to divide the total
cohort into subjects with asthma of long duration (LDA; n = 38) and
those with asthma of short duration (SDA; n = 37). Hence, subjects
who had had asthma for
26 yr were classified as having LDA and
those who had had asthma for < 26 yr were classified as having SDA.
In order to optimize lung function in the study, we prescribed inhaled corticosteroids to all subjects in accordance with the NIH/ NAEPP guidelines (18). The majority of subjects required medium to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. There was no significant difference in the dosages of inhaled corticosteroids prescribed to the patients with LDA as compared with those with SDA.
Serum IgE and Radioallergosorbent Testing
Total serum IgE and specific serum IgE to 15 different indoor and
outdoor allergens was measured in a random subset of 40 subjects.
The demographic and clinical characteristics of this subgroup did not
differ significantly from those of the total study cohort. The allergens
selected for testing were those commonly found in urban areas in
the northeastern United States and included cat epithelium, dog epithelium, mouse urine protein, house dust mite (Dermatophagoides
farinae and D. pterynissinus), cockroach (Blatella germanica), grasses
(timothy and orchard cocksfoot), weeds (English plantain and common ragweed), trees (oak, sycamore, and maple), and molds (Alternaria tenuis and Aspergillus fumigatus). Specific IgE was measured by
radioallergosorbent testing (RAST). Total serum IgE and RAST
measurements were performed at a commercial laboratory (Quest
Diagnostics Inc., Teterboro, NJ) with an ImmunoCAP assay (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) (19, 20). The assay was calibrated against the
World Health Organization standards. The normal range for specific
serum IgE was 0 to 180 U/ml. For IgE to specific allergens,
0.35 kIU/L was considered positive.
Pulmonary Function Testing
After enrollment in the BHPCAC, all subjects underwent baseline and
postbronchodilator spirometry in the Bellevue Hospital pulmonary
function laboratory. Inhaled short-acting
2-agonists were withheld for
at least 4 h before baseline testing. Long-acting
2-agonists were not
prescribed to study subjects before pulmonary function testing. Inhaled
2-agonists were subsequently administered via spacer device for
postbronchodilator evaluation. Maximal expiratory flow-volume
curves were obtained, and FVC, FEV1, expiratory flow at mid-lung
volume (
50), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were determined.
Airway resistance (Raw) and specific airway conductance (SGaw)
were measured with a panting maneuver performed in a plethysmograph. In a subgroup of 37 subjects, baseline and postbronchodilator FRC was measured by body plethysmography (P.K. Morgan, Andover, MA) using standard methods (21, 22). TLC and RV were calculated from these measurements. Accuracy checks for mouth pressure,
box pressure, and body plethysmograph mouth flow were made on a
daily basis. Spirometric measurements were referenced to the data of Knudsen (23) and lung volumes were referenced to the data of Goldman and Becklake (24). The % predicted values for each physiologic measurement were calculated for each study subject.
Statistical Analysis
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects with LDA and those with SDA were compared through chi-square analysis. In order to minimize the potentially confounding influences of sex, height, and age on physiologic parameters, statistical analyses were performed on the % predicted values instead of the raw measured data. The % predicted values of physiologic measurements in the patients with LDA were compared with those in the patients with SDA through t tests, analysis of variance, and Wilcoxon's rank sum analyses where appropriate (a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant).
Regression analyses were performed to further delineate the relationship between pulmonary physiology and duration of asthma. The
% predicted value of each physiologic parameter was regressed on
the duration of asthma in years. Standardized
coefficients were used
for multiple regression models to allow comparison of the relative impact of the variables. All analyses were performed with the JMP version 3.1.5 statistical software package (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Demographic Characteristics of Subjects
As shown in Table 1, subjects ranged in age from 60 to 80 yr, with a median age of 65 yr. There was no significant difference in age between the groups with LDA and SDA. The majority of the cohort was female (81%); more patients with LDA than with SDA were women (92% versus 70%, respectively; p < 0.02). Most subjects were of Hispanic or African-American descent (81%); the distribution of race/ethnicity was similar among both study subgroups, and reflected the demographics of our urban community.
|
Clinical Characteristics of Asthma in Study Subjects
The age of onset of asthma varied greatly among study subjects; some reported lifelong asthma, whereas others reported asthma onset after age 60 yr. The median age of onset was age 40 yr. Duration of asthma ranged from several months to 74 yr. The median duration of asthma in patients with LDA was 40 yr, compared with 9 yr in the patients with SDA.
All subjects had persistent asthma upon entry into the BHPCAC as defined by the NIH/NAEPP guidelines (18). The majority of the total cohort (75%), as well as the majority of patients with LDA and SDA (76% and 73%, respectively), had severe persistent asthma as determined by daily and nocturnal symptom frequency (Table 2). A history of intubation for asthma was common in the total cohort; however, more patients with LDA than with SDA had been intubated in the past (14% versus 3%, respectively). Many of the total cohort were unable to walk more than one city block (64%) or climb more than one flight of subway stairs (57%) without stopping for breath. The patients with LDA tended to report more limited ability to walk than those with SDA; however, both had equally severe impairment of their ability to climb subway stairs.
|
The patients with LDA and those with SDA did not differ in terms of atopy, as evidenced by total and specific serum IgE measurements. The median total serum IgE was similar in the patients with LDA (n = 20) and those with SDA (n = 20) (71 U/ml versus 56 U/ml, respectively). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the percentages of patients with LDA and with SDA who had an increased specific IgE to one of the allergens tested (57% versus 43%, respectively).
Evaluation of Airflow
Multiple measures of large airway function demonstrated that
the patients with LDA had more severe airflow obstruction
than those with SDA. Both the LDA and SDA patients had
substantial airflow limitation as measured by FEV1 (1.27 ± 0.07 L and 1.65 ± 0.09 L [mean ± SEM], respectively) and
50
(1.14 ± 0.13 L/s and 1.56 ± 0.13 L/s, respectively). When expressed as a percentage of predicted values, the degree of airflow limitation was more severe in the LDA as compared with
the SDA group, as evidenced by FEV1 (59.5 ± 2.6 versus 73.8 ± 3.1, respectively; p < 0.007) and a trend toward lower values
of
50 (38.7 ± 4.3 versus 50.5 ± 4.4, respectively; p < 0.06)
(Figure 1). Similarly, baseline PEFR was significantly lower
among the patients with LDA than among those with SDA
(3.3 ± 0.2 L/s versus 4.4 ± 0.2 L/s, respectively; p < 0.002).
Furthermore, Raw was significantly greater in the LDA than
in the SDA group (3.52 ± 0.24 cm H2O/L/s versus 2.53 ± 0.24 cm H2O/L/s; p < 0.006), and there was a trend toward a lower
SGaw in the LDA than in the SDA group (0.09 ± 0.012 L/cm H2O/L/s versus 0.12 ± 0.012 L/cm H2O/L/s; p < 0.09).
|
Regression analyses were performed to further examine
the relationship between the duration of asthma and airflow in
the total cohort. An inverse correlation was observed between
the duration of asthma and both the % predicted FEV1 (r = 0.26, p < 0.03) and the % predicted
50 (r = 0.27, p < 0.03)
(Figures 2A and 2B). A direct relationship was observed between Raw and duration of asthma (r = 0.34, p < 0.01). Inverse relationships were also observed between the duration
of asthma and both PEFR (r = 0.11, p < 0.02) and SGaw (r = 0.29, p < 0.03) (data not shown).
|
Airflow Response to Bronchodilator Administration
The degree of reversibility of airflow limitation was also assessed with multiple parameters. Postbronchodilator FEV1%
predicted was significantly lower in the group with LDA than
in the group with SDA (65.4 ± 2.9% versus 80.9 ± 2.9%, respectively; p < 0.0003), as was the postbronchodilator
50%
predicted (41.3 ± 4.4% versus 59.6 ± 4.5%, respectively; p < 0.006) (Figure 1). Similarly, the postbronchodilator PEFR was
significantly lower in the group with LDA than in that with
SDA (3.6 ± 0.2 L/s versus 4.8 ± 0.2 L/s, respectively; p < 0.0006). After bronchodilator administration, Raw remained
higher in the group with LDA than in the group with SDA
(3.18 ± 0.27 cm H2O/L/s versus 2.04 ± 0.29 cm H2O/L/s, respectively; p < 0.007) and SGaw was significantly lower in the
group with LDA (0.09 ± 0.01% versus 0.16 ± 0.01, respectively; p < 0.0003).
Both the patients with LDA and those with SDA showed a
similar mean percentage improvement in FEV1 (11.6 ± 2.0%
and 10.9 ± 2.0%, respectively). Although the patients with
LDA showed a slightly lower mean absolute improvement in
FEV1 than did those with SDA (127 ± 27 ml and 167 ± 28 ml,
respectively), this difference did not achieve statistical significance. A significant bronchodilator response, defined as an
improvement of
12% in FEV1 (25), was attained by similar
percentages of patients with LDA and with SDA (39% and
35%, respectively). The patients with SDA showed a significantly greater improvement in
50 after bronchodilator administration than did those with LDA (23.9 ± 4.6% versus 8.3 ± 4.0%, respectively; p < 0.02).
Importantly, only 18% of the patients with LDA were able
to attain a postbronchodilator FEV1 that was
80% predicted;
in contrast, 50% of the patients with SDA achieved a normal
FEV1 (p < 0.003). In fact, the patients with LDA continued to
have severe airflow obstruction even after bronchodilator administration, with a mean FEV1% predicted of 65.4 ± 2.9%.
Evaluation of Lung Volumes
As seen in Figure 3, the slow vital capacity (SVC) was at the lower limit of normal and TLC was at the upper limit of normal in both the LDA and SDA groups. FRC, RV, and RV/TLC were substantially increased in both groups. However, the degree of hyperinflation was significantly greater in the LDA than in the SDA group as evidenced by the FRC (142 ± 5.6% versus 124.1 ± 4.4% predicted, respectively; p < 0.01) and RV/ TLC (60.9 ± 1.6% versus 55 ± 1.6%, respectively; p < 0.02).
|
Regression analysis done on the entire cohort failed to show a relationship between either SVC or TLC and the duration of asthma (data not shown). However, linear regression analysis of data from the entire cohort revealed a direct correlation between FRC and duration of asthma (r = 0.38, p < 0.002) (Figure 4).
|
Lung Volume Response to Bronchodilator Administration
Lung volume measurements were repeated after bronchodilator administration. As shown in Figure 3, there was no significant change in TLC or SVC in either the LDA or the SDA group. There was a trend toward a reduction in FRC after bronchodilator administration in both groups. However, even after bronchodilator administration the FRC remained significantly higher in the LDA than in the SDA group (143 ± 6% versus 117 ± 6% predicted, respectively, p < 0.01). Both RV and RV/TLC remained greater in the LDA than in the SDA group after bronchodilator administration.
Flow-Volume Relationships
To determine whether airflow abnormalities were reflections
of airway resistance rather than of volume, we evaluated flow- volume relationships. Baseline FEV1/FVC was slightly lower
in the LDA than in the SDA group (64.4 ± 2.1 versus 69.9 ± 1.7, respectively; p < 0.05), and remained lower in the LDA
group after bronchodilator administration (64.2 ± 2.2 versus
71.7 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.005). Both baseline and postbronchodilator
50/FVC were similarly reduced in both the
LDA and SDA groups. Postbronchodilator
50/TLC was significantly lower in the LDA than in the SDA group. Regression analyses revealed an inverse correlation between duration of asthma and both FEV1/FVC (r = 0.24, p < 0.04) and
50/TLC (r = 0.24, p < 0.02) (data not shown). The decrease
in flow:volume ratios with duration of asthma suggested that
the airflow limitation was a reflection of resistance.
Interaction Between Flow, Volume, and Duration of Asthma
To analyze the relationship between airflow limitation and hyperinflation, we performed regression analyses on data from
the total study cohort. Both FRC% predicted and RV% predicted were regressed on several parameters of airflow, including FEV1/ FVC, FEV1% predicted,
50, and
25. An inverse correlation was demonstrated between RV and FEV1/
FVC (r = 0.41, p < 0.0005), FEV1 (r = 0.32; p < 0.008),
50 (r = 0.43, p < 0.0002), and
25 (r = 0.30, p < 0.01). Similar relationships were found between FRC and FEV1/FVC (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), FEV1 (r = 0.30; p < 0.02),
50 (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001), and
25 (r = 0.41, p < 0.0005).
These findings raised the question of whether the degree of
hyperinflation was determined by the degree of airflow obstruction, the duration of disease, or the interaction of these
two factors. Multiple linear regression models were used to
determine the relationships between either FRC or RV and
several parameters of airflow, duration of asthma, and the interaction of airflow and duration. The airflow parameters
tested included FEV1% predicted, FEV1/FVC,
50% predicted,
50/FVC,
25% predicted, and
25/FVC. In Table 3,
standardized
coefficients are presented to allow comparison
of the strength of the association between FEV1/FVC or duration of disease and RV or FRC. Using this model, we noted a
significant relationship between FEV1/FVC and RV, but not
between the duration of disease and RV. In contrast, both
FEV1/FVC and duration of asthma were found to be statistically significant predictors of FRC. A similar pattern was demonstrated for each airflow parameter tested.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A large body of evidence suggests that airway inflammation in asthma leads to distortion of bronchial architecture and may lead to irreversible changes in pulmonary function (4, 6, 7). However, few studies have characterized the physiologic consequences of longstanding asthma (17, 26). Longitudinal studies spanning relatively short periods have shown that asthmatic individuals have an accelerated rate of decline in lung function as compared with the general population (27, 28). Elderly asthmatic individuals represent an ideal population in which to use cross-sectional analysis to investigate the consequences of prolonged airway inflammation. Our study evaluated airflow, lung volumes, and bronchodilator response as a function of duration of disease in a cohort of elderly lifetime nonsmokers with asthma. The degree of airflow limitation and hyperinflation was directly related to the duration of asthma. Although many other factors including environmental exposures, occupational exposures, prior therapy, and genetic predisposition may have contributed to the observed physiologic abnormalities in our subjects, the fact that we were able to identify a significant association between decrements in pulmonary function and the duration of asthma is striking. Furthermore, elderly subjects with longstanding asthma failed to achieve normal airflow after bronchodilator administration, in contrast to those with asthma of short duration. Our study confirms and extends previous observations suggesting that longstanding asthma leads to irreversible airway changes, and also suggests the involvement of distal airways or parenchymal remodeling in this process.
Most previous accounts of asthma in the elderly have used spirometry as their sole method of physiologic assessment (5, 17, 26, 27, 29, 30). In our study, multiple parameters of large airway function were assessed. As compared with those with SDA, subjects with LDA consistently displayed more severe airflow limitation in all measurements. Furthermore, our study suggested that the severe decrements in pulmonary function associated with long-term asthma may become irreversible. After bronchodilator administration, most of our subjects with LDA failed to achieve normal airflow. Strikingly, more than half of these subjects continued to display severe airflow obstruction after bronchodilator administration. In contrast, 50% of the subjects with SDA attained normal airflow values after bronchodilator administration. These observations are of particular significance because all of our subjects had been stabilized on inhaled corticosteroids before pulmonary function testing. The findings support the hypothesis that longstanding airway inflammation from asthma can lead to airway remodeling and irreversible airflow limitation. Although it is of interest, the contribution of small airways disease to the observed airflow abnormalities could not be independently assessed because of the profound abnormalities in large airway function.
To further describe abnormalities associated with the duration of asthma, we examined the relationship between duration of asthma and lung volumes. Both the LDA and the SDA groups had substantially increased RV and FRC. However, subjects with longstanding asthma had an even greater degree of hyperinflation. This profound degree of hyperinflation may lead to a mechanical disadvantage, and may contribute to the dyspnea and activity limitations reported by these patients.
Dykstra and coworkers demonstrated a strong correlation between the degree of airflow obstruction and the degree of hyperinflation in a cohort of subjects with obstructive lung diseases (31). We confirmed the association between airflow obstruction (FEV1) and hyperinflation as measured by RV and FRC in our cohort of elderly asthmatic individuals. This raised questions about the effect of the duration of asthma on these observations. When both the duration of disease and airflow limitation were considered, RV remained strongly associated only with the degree of obstruction. In contrast, the increase in FRC was associated with both the duration of disease and the degree of airflow obstruction. Although increases in FRC can result from airflow obstruction, our observation suggests an additional mechanism, such as a loss of elastic recoil, which would manifest as hyperinflation in the end-tidal position.
Multiple mechanisms may lead to loss of elastic recoil in the elderly asthmatic population. Aging has been associated with loss of elastic recoil; however, this is unlikely to account for our findings, since the groups with LDA and SDA did not differ significantly from one another in age, and % predicted values were used for analysis. Loss of elastic recoil may also result from mechanical disruption, as has been described in acute asthma (32, 33). An alternative mechanism has been suggested by recent studies using transbronchial biopsies. In these studies, subjects with nocturnal asthma showed inflammation in the distal airway and alveolar tissue that was characterized by an increase in eosinophils, macrophages, and CD4+ lymphocytes (2, 3). Our observations suggest the hypothesis that persistent distal airway or alveolar tissue inflammation may lead to structural changes that can result in a loss of elastic recoil reflected by increases in FRC.
It is unclear whether previous therapy was a factor in our observations. Subjects with LDA had their disease diagnosed before the widespread use of inhaled corticosteroids. Although 50% of each of our two study groups reported using inhaled corticosteroids before enrollment in the study, neither the corticosteroid dose nor the compliance with or duration of this therapy could be confirmed. A prospective study would be necessary to determine the effect of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on the decline in lung function over time in subjects with asthma. Furthermore, our study was done with a cohort of patients derived from a specialty clinic; this select group of patients with relatively severe asthma may serve as a model, but may not represent the general population of asthmatic individuals. It is important that despite the small size of our cohort, we were able to identify a significant association between the duration of asthma and physiologic measurements. It would be of interest to look at the effect of duration of asthma on physiologic parameters in additional cohorts, including those of younger age.
In summary, the data from our study suggest that longstanding asthma results in irreversible decrements in lung function, which may manifest as tobacco-independent chronic obstructive lung disease. On the basis of a human model and multiple physiologic outcomes, the results of the study support the notion of the development of fixed airway obstruction that may result from airway remodeling due to decades of persistent airway inflammation. Moreover, the observations in the study suggest that prolonged asthma is associated with increases in FRC, suggesting an additional effect of parenchymal remodeling. Long-term prospective studies correlating physiology with histology from lung biopsy samples would be necessary to further explore these hypotheses. These data raise the question of whether early intervention in childhood asthma would prevent progressive decline in lung function. The potential role of antiinflammatory agents in preventing this process awaits further study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Joan Reibman, M.D., NYU Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: reibmj01{at}gcrc.med.nyu.edu
(Received in original form January 3, 2000 and in revised form May 16, 2000).
Acknowledgments: Supported by grants KO7 HL03050, HL09686, and M01 RR00096, ES00260 from the National Institutes of Health.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Busse, W. W.. 1998. Inflammation in asthma: the cornerstone of the disease and target of therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102: S17-S22 [Medline].
2. Kraft, M., R. Djukanovic, S. Wilson, S.T. Holgate, and R. Martin. 1996. Alveolar tissue inflammation in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 154: 1505-1510 [Abstract].
3.
Kraft, M.,
R. J. Martin,
S. Wilson,
R. Djukanovic, and
S. Holgate.
1999.
Lymphocytic and eosinophilic influx into alveolar tissue in nocturnal
asthma.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
159:
228-234
4. Holgate, S. T. 1997. Asthma: a dynamic disease of inflammation and repair. In D. J. Chadwick and G. Cardew, editors. The Rising Trends in Asthma. Ciba Foundation Symposium No. 206. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 5-34.
5. Sobonya, R. E.. 1984. Quantitative structural alterations in longstanding allergic asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 130: 289-292 [Medline].
6.
Busse, W.,
J. Elais,
D. Sheppard, and
S. Banks-Schlegel.
1999.
Airway
remodeling and repair.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
160:
1035-1042
7. Fish, J. E., and S. P. Peters. 1999. Airway remodeling and persistent airway obstruction in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 104: 509-516 [Medline].
8. Roche, W. R., R. Beasley, J. H. Williams, and S. T. Holgate. 1989. Subepithelial fibrosis in the bronchi of asthmatics. Lancet 1: 520-523 [Medline].
9.
Laitinen, L. A.,
A. Laitinen,
A. Altraja,
I. Virtanen,
M. Kampe,
B. G. Simonsson,
S. E. Karlsson,
L. Hakansson,
P. Venge, and
H. Sillastu.
1996.
Inflammatory determinants of asthma severity
bronchial biopsy findings in intermittent or early asthma.
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
98:
S3-S6
[Medline].
10. Barbee, R. A. 1997. Epidemiology and natural history. In R. A. Barbee and J. W. Bloom, editors. Asthma in the Elderly. Marcel Dekker, New York. 1-31.
11. Burrows, B., M. D. Lebowitz, R. A. Barbee, and M. G. Cline. 1991. Findings before diagnoses of asthma among the elderly in a longitudinal study of a general population sample. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 88: 870-877 [Medline].
12. Lee, K. Y., and T. B. Stretton. 1972. Asthma in the elderly. B.M.J. 4: 93-95 .
13. Bauer, B. A., C. E. Reed, J. W. Yunginger, P. C. Wollan, and M. D. Silverstein. 1997. Incidence and outcomes of asthma in the elderly. Chest 11: 303-310 .
14. Nejjari, C., J. F. Tessier, P. Barberger-Gateau, H. Jacqmin, J. F. Dartigues, and R. Salamon. 1994. Functional status of elderly people treated for asthma-related symptoms: a population based case-control study. Eur. Respir. J. 7: 1077-1083 [Abstract].
15. Burr, M. L., T. J. Charles, K. Roy, and A. Seaton. 1979. Asthma in the elderly: an epidemiological survey. B.M.J. 1: 1041-1044 .
16.
Burrows, B.,
R. A. Barbee,
M. G. Cline,
R. J. Knudson, and
M. D. Lebowitz.
1991.
Characteristics of asthma among elderly adults in a sample of
the general population.
Chest
100:
935-942
17. Quadrelli, S. A., and A. J. Roncoroni. 1998. Is asthma in the elderly really different? Respiration 65: 347-353 [Medline].
18. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 1997. Expert Panel Report 2: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
19. Leimgruber, A., B. Mosimann, M. Claeys, M. Seppey, Y. Jaccard, V. Aubert, R. Peitrequin, M. P. Nisoli, and A. Pecoud. 1991. Clinical evaluation of a new in-vitro assay for specific IgE: the immuno CAP system. Clin. Exp. Allergy 21: 127-131 [Medline].
20. Leimgruber, A., J. P. Lantin, and P. C. Frei. 1993. Comparison of two in vitro assays, RAST and CAP, when applied to the diagnosis of anaphylactic reactions to honeybee or yellow jacket venoms: correlation with history and skin tests. Allergy 48: 415-420 [Medline].
21. Coates, A. L., R. Peslin, D. Rodenstein, and J. Stocks. 1997. Measurement of lung volumes by plethysmography. Eur. Respir. J. 10: 1415-1427 [Medline].
22.
American Thoracic Society.
1987.
Standardization of spirometry
1987
update.
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
136:
1285-1298
[Medline].
23. Knudson, R. I., M. D. Lebowitz, C. J. Holberg, and B. Burrows. 1983. Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 127: 725-734 [Medline].
24. Goldman, H. I., and M. R. Becklake. 1959. Respiratory function tests: normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 79: 457-467 . [Medline]
25. American Thoracic Society. 1991. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretive strategies. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 144: 1202-1218 [Medline].
26.
Braman, S. S.,
J. T. Kaemmerlen, and
S. M. Davis.
1991.
Asthma in the
elderly
a comparison between patients with recently acquired and
long standing disease.
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
143:
336-340
[Medline].
27.
Lange, P.,
J. Parner,
J. Vestbo,
P. Schnohr, and
G. Jensen.
1998.
A 15-year follow-up study of ventilatory function in adults with asthma.
N.
Engl. J. Med.
339:
1194-1200
28. Peat, J. K., A. J. Woolcock, and K. Cullen. 1987. Rate of decline of lung function in subjects with asthma. Eur. J. Respir. Dis. 70: 171-179 [Medline].
29. Brown, P. J., H. W. Greville, and K. E. Finucane. 1984. Asthma and irreversible airflow obstruction. Thorax 39: 131-136 [Abstract].
30. Reed, C. E.. 1999. The natural history of asthma in adults: the problem of irreversibility. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 5103: 539-47 .
31.
Dykstra, B. J.,
P. D. Scanlon,
M. M. Kester,
K. C. Beck, and
P. L. Enright.
1999.
Lung volumes in 4774 patients with obstructive lung disease.
Chest
115:
68-74
32. Peress, L., G. Sybrecht, and P. T. Macklem. 1976. The mechanism of increase in total lung capacity during acute asthma. Am. J. Med. 61: 165-169 [Medline].
33.
Rodarte, J. R.,
G. Noredin,
C. Miller,
V. Brusasco, and
R. Pellegrino.
1999.
Lung elastic recoil during breathing at increased lung volumes.
J. Appl. Physiol.
87:
1491-1495
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Sorkness, E. R. Bleecker, W. W. Busse, W. J. Calhoun, M. Castro, K. F. Chung, D. Curran-Everett, S. C. Erzurum, B. M. Gaston, E. Israel, et al. Lung function in adults with stable but severe asthma: air trapping and incomplete reversal of obstruction with bronchodilation J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 394 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. James and S. Wenzel Clinical relevance of airway remodelling in airway diseases Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2007; 30(1): 134 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. O'Byrne, S. Pedersen, W. W. Busse, W. C. Tan, Y.-Z. Chen, S. V. Ohlsson, A. Ullman, C. J. Lamm, and R. A. Pauwels Effects of Early Intervention With Inhaled Budesonide on Lung Function in Newly Diagnosed Asthma Chest, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1478 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Bussamra, A. Cukier, R. Stelmach, and J. C. Rodrigues Evaluation of the Magnitude of the Bronchodilator Response in Children and Adolescents With Asthma Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2): 530 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.M. Vignola, A. Bonanno, M. Profita, L. Riccobono, N. Scichilone, M. Spatafora, J. Bousquet, G. Bonsignore, and V. Bellia Effect of age and asthma duration upon elastase and {alpha}1-antitrypsin levels in adult asthmatics Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2003; 22(5): 795 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.J.A. Duncan, A. Lawrie, M.G. Blaylock, J.G. Douglas, and G.M. Walsh Reduced eosinophil apoptosis in induced sputum correlates with asthma severity Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2003; 22(3): 484 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rogers, C. Cassino, K. I. Berger, R. M. Goldring, R. G. Norman, T. Klugh, and J. Reibman Asthma in the Elderly: Cockroach Sensitization and Severity of Airway Obstruction in Elderly Nonsmokers Chest, November 1, 2002; 122(5): 1580 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Gelb, J. Licuanan, C. M. Shinar, and N. Zamel Unsuspected Loss of Lung Elastic Recoil in Chronic Persistent Asthma Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 715 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Asthma, Airway Biology, and Allergic Rhinitis in AJRCCM 2000 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2001; 164(9): 1559 - 1580. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |