help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PANG, G.
Right arrow Articles by REEVES, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PANG, G.
Right arrow Articles by REEVES, G.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 161, Number 3, March 2000, 718-722

Influenza Virus Inhibits Lysozyme Secretion by Sputum Neutrophils in Subjects with Chronic Bronchial Sepsis

GERALD PANG, ROBERT CLANCY, MA CONG, MARIA ORTEGA, REN ZHIGANG, and GLEN REEVES

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle; and Hunter Immunology Unit, Royal Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, Australia


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Neutrophils are central to the control of infection within the bronchial mucosa. To determine whether the link between bacterial and viral infection in the respiratory tract can be partly explained by acute reduction of neutrophil function, we examined the influence of influenza virus on lysozyme secretion by sputum neutrophils obtained from patients with bronchiectasis. Sputum neutrophils infected with influenza A virus had a significantly reduced capacity to secrete lysozyme but not myeloperoxidase. Influenza virus A strains were more effective in inhibiting lysozyme secretion than were influenza B virus strains. Reduction of bactericidal activity was similarly reduced by different strains of influenza A virus, but an influenza virus B strain had no effect. Our results show that downregulation of sputum neutrophil function characterized by lysozyme secretion and bactericidal activity could contribute to reduction in the capacity to control bacterial colonization in the respiratory tract following influenza virus infection. Pang G, Clancy R, Cong M, Ortega M, Zhigang R, Reeves G. Influenza virus inhibits lysozyme secretion by sputum neutrophils in subjects with chronic bronchial sepsis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protection within the airways against infection involves a complex interaction between components of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. For example, neutrophils are central to the control of infection within the lumen of the bronchus. Neutrophil recruitment, activation, and retention within the bronchus are controlled by both T-cell-dependent (1, 2) and autocrine mechanisms, with the latter involving the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha , interleukin (IL)-1beta , and IL-8 by activated neutrophils (3). The improved efficiency of bacterial clearance that comes from the activation of mucosa-targeted T cells is seen in a reduction in sputum purulence of subjects with chronic bronchitis after oral immunization with killed bacteria (4, 5).

A characteristic of intrabronchial neutrophils is the production of lysozyme secreted into the bronchial lumen (6). The level of lysozyme in respiratory tract secretions of subjects with chronic bronchitis has been inversely related to proneness to recurrent episodes of acute bronchitis (7). The mechanism of protection mediated by lysozyme involves aggregation of bacteria, with reduced colonization of mucosal surfaces (8, 9). Thus, control of lysozyme secretion is likely to be a key factor influencing the pattern of respiratory tract infections in patients with damaged airway defenses. Episodes of acute bronchitis have been particularly linked to intercurrent virus infection, with influenza virus infection attracting particular concern in the elderly population. The present study was planned to examine the influence of influenza virus of lysozyme secretion by sputum neutrophils obtained from subjects with bronchiectasis, to determine whether the epidemiologically defined link between viral and bacterial infection of the respiratory tract can in part be understood in terms of an acute reduction in neutrophil function induced by influenza virus infection.

    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects

Six subjects with bronchiectasis were studied. The diagnosis of bronchiectasis was confirmed by computed tomographic examination of the lungs. Each subject produced sputum daily. Assessment of the subjects was chronologically remote from episodes of acute infection, and was done when no antibiotics or corticosteroids were being taken. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Hunter Area Health Service and the University of Newcastle.

Sputum Collection

Sputum was collected by expectoration into a 50-ml sterile container, and on some occasions venous blood was drawn at the same time into a tube containing trisodium citrate. All specimens were processed immediately after collection.

Neutrophils

Neutrophils were isolated from sputum through modification of a previously described procedure (3). In brief, sputum was collected in a sterile container and transferred into a 50-ml Falcon centrifuge tube (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) to which 25 ml of cold, sterile Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) was added. The mixture was shaken vigorously, and after addition of an equal volume of HBSS the suspension was filtered through a 10-ml syringe packed with glass wool. The cells were collected by centrifugation, washed twice with HBSS, and then resuspended in 10 ml HBSS. Following this, the cells were layered onto a Percoll gradient (40% to 50% stock solution in saline) and centrifuged for 20 min at 400 × g to remove macrophages, epithelial cells, and lymphocytes. Neutrophils were recovered from the interface of the 50% and 40% phases. Cells were counted, and their viability was assessed with the trypan blue dye exclusion test. The purity of the neutrophil suspension was greater than 98% as assessed by May- Grunwald-Giemsa staining.

Blood neutrophils were isolated from citrated blood by sedimentation in 3% gelatin/0.9% saline, followed by centrifugation through a Ficoll/Hypaque density gradient. Erythrocytes were removed by lysis in 0.15 M NH4Cl and 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.2. The neutrophils were recovered, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in HBSS. The purity of neutrophils was between 98% and 100%.

Preparation of Influenza Virus

All viruses were obtained from Professor Greg Tannock of the Department of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, Royal Medical Institute of Technology, Victoria, Australia, and were grown in fertile hens' eggs for 2 d at 33 to 34° C. The following strains were used: A/ Texas/36/91 (H1N1), A/Qld/6/72 (H3N2), A/Ann Arbor (AA)/6/60 (H2N2), A/Beijing/352/92 (H3N2), B/Panama/45/90, and B/USSR/3/ 87. Viruses were harvested from allantoic fluid and purified on a sucrose gradient (10). Virus stocks were dialyzed against PBS and stored at -70° C until used. The potency of each stock was determined with an infectivity plaque assay, using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells, and titers of 108 to 109 pfu/ml were obtained.

Lysozyme Release

Neutrophils (5 × 106/ml) were incubated with 0.1 ml of virus or HBSS for 30 min at 37° C. After various times, the cells were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was assayed for lysozyme concentration. In some experiments, intracellular lysozyme content was measured in clarified cell lysate obtained by lysing neutrophils with a 0.05% Triton-100 solution followed by centrifugation. Lysozyme was measured with a double-antibody sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described (11). Briefly, ELISA plates (Immunoplate I; Nunc, Copenhagen, Denmark) were coated overnight at 4° C with rabbit antihuman lysozyme in sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). After washing of the plates with PBS containing 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween, various concentrations of standard purified human lysozyme (Kallestad, CA) or test supernatants diluted in PBS/Tween/3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) were added to each well. The plates were incubated for 90 min at room temperature (RT), after which they were washed, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antihuman lysozyme antibody (Binding Site Ltd, UK) diluted in PBS/Tween/3% BSA was added to each well and incubated for 30 min at RT. After washing, enzyme substrate (tetramethylbenzidine dihydrochloride) (Sigma-Aldrich Ltd., Australia) was added to each well for 20 min. The reaction was stopped with sulfuric acid, and the absorbance was read on an ELISA plate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). The lysozyme content in micrograms per milliliter of supernatant samples was read from a standard curve. The ELISA assay was antigen-specific, since human lysozyme was undetectable in culture supernatants spiked with purified virus, virus in allantoic fluid, or chicken lysozyme (data not shown).

Myeloperoxidase Production

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) in culture supernatants of neutrophils was measured in triplicate, using commercial ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Bactericidal Activity

One-milliliter aliquots of neutrophil suspension (5 × 106/ml) were preincubated with 0.1 ml virus or HBSS for 30 min at 37° C, after which preopsonized Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype II, phage type 21/44/109/119X/1214 (Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK) was added at a ratio of 25:1 and the preparation was incubated with gentle mixing on a roller for 30 or 60 min at 37° C. At each time point, several dilutions of the incubation mixture were plated on chocalate agar. After incubation for 3 d, the percentage of bacteria killed was calculated (Table 5). The percentage of bacteria killed varied from 10% to 50% in the neutrophil-bacteria suspension, but no bacterial growth was detected in the cell lysate prepared from neutrophils that were washed three times in HBSS before being homogenized in 0.01% BSA (wt/vol in HBSS) with an Ultra-Turrax T25 homogenizer fitted with a probe (Staufen, Germany).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 5

BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY AGAINST Pseudomonas aeruginosa OF SPUTUM NEUTROPHILS INFECTED OR UNINFECTED WITH INFLUENZA VIRUS

Statistical Analysis

For individual subjects, data are given as the mean + SEM. Median values and ranges are shown for the subject group. Statistical significance was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test. All calculations were performed with a statistical software program (PRISM Version 2; GraphPad, San Diego, CA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lysozyme Secretion by Sputum Neutrophils Infected with Influenza Virus

Table 1 shows the amounts of lysozyme secreted by sputum neutrophils obtained from six subjects from bronchiectasis. The results showed that cells infected with influenza virus A/ Qld secreted significantly less lysozyme than did uninfected controls (p < 0.05). Table 2 shows the time course of lysozyme secretion compared with that of MPO in sputum neutrophil cultures infected with influenza virus A/Qld/6/72. Although lysozyme secretion was inhibited by influenza virus, there was no significant reduction in MPO levels in culture supernatants of uninfected neutrophils, irrespective of the time of incubation or the dose of virus (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1

LYSOZYME SECRETION BY SPUTUM NEUTROPHILS INFECTED WITH INFLUENZA VIRUS

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 2

EFFECT OF TIME ON LYSOZYME AND MYELOPEROXIDASE SECRETION BY SPUTUM NEUTROPHILS INFECTED WITH A/Qld/6/72 INFLUENZA VIRUS

Effects of Virus Dose and Virus Hemagglutin (HA) Subtypes on Lysozyme Secretion

Sputum neutrophils were infected with graded doses of A/ Qld/6/72 virus and then incubated for 30 min at 37° C, after which secreted lysozyme was measured in supernatant. As shown in Table 3, lysozyme secretion by sputum neutrophils was inhibited by the virus in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, inhibition of lysozyme was not restricted to a particular influenza A virus strain, as shown in Table 4, but influenza B viruses (B/USSR and B/Panama) had little or no effect.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 3

LYSOZYME SECRETION BY SPUTUM NEUTROPHILS INFECTED WITH  GRADED DOSES OF A/Qld/6/72 (H3N2) INFLUENZA VIRUS

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 4

INHIBITION OF LYSOZYME SECRETION BY SPUTUM NEUTROPHILS INFECTED WITH INFLUENZA A AND B VIRUSES

Effect of Influenza Virus Infection on Intracellular and Extracellular Lysozyme Concentrations

To determine whether there was a relationship between extracellular and intracellular lysozyme concentrations, we infected blood and sputum neutrophils from six individual subjects with influenza virus and measured the kinetics of the amounts of lysozyme released or retained in the cells. As shown in Figure 1, secretion of lysozyme by sputum neutrophils was inhibited as early as 15 min and for up to 120 min after infection. Although marked inhibition of lysozyme secretion by blood neutrophils infected with virus was observed at 15 min and for up to 60 min after infection, sputum neutrophils contained more lysozyme than did blood neutrophils (p < 0.05). In both cases, however, levels of lysozyme were unaffected by virus infection, irrespective of incubation time.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Comparison of cellular and secreted lysozyme from blood and sputum neutrophils infected with influenza virus. Blood and sputum neutrophils were infected with 105 pfu/ml of influenza virus A/Beijing/352/92 (H3N2). Extracellular (secreted) and intracellular (retained) lysozyme were measured in triplicate in culture supernatants and cell lysates at various times shown. Results shown are mean ± SEM from six individual subjects. Uninfected controls are shown by open bar; infected subjects are shown by hatched bar. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001 compared with values from uninfected cultures.

Effect of Influenza Virus Infection on Bactericidal Activity of Sputum Neutrophils

Sputum neutrophils were infected with various strains of influenza viruses and then challenged with live P. aeruginosa bacteria. As shown in Table 5, the ability of neutrophils infected with influenza virus strains A/Qld (p < 0.05) and A/Texas (p < 0.001) to kill bacteria was decreased after 30 and 60 min. In contrast, a decrease in killing activity was observed only after 60 min for cells infected with influenza virus strain A/AA (p < 0.05), and minimal to no killing was observed for cells infected with strains B/USSR or B/Panama (data not shown for the latter virus).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Infection with influenza A virus of neutrophils obtained from the sputum of subjects with bronchiectasis induced a rapid downregulation of function, characterized by a reduction in lysozyme secretion and in bactericidal activity. The cells remained functionally intact, with no change in cell loss of MPO. Lysozyme secretion and bactericidal function were similarly reduced by different influenza A virus strains, but an influenza B virus strain had no effect on neutrophil function.

In human airway secretions, lysozyme is derived from various sources, including the submucosal tracheal glands, surface epithelial cells, and pulmonary alveolar macrophages (AM) (12). Although AM provide the primary phagocytic response to inhaled microbes in the normal bronchoalveolar system, the neutrophil is the dominant phagocytic cell in subjects with damaged airways chronically colonized by bacteria, representing more than 98% of the cellular content of sputum from subjects with chronic lung disease (3, 13). We have found that about two thirds of the total sputum lysozyme in subjects with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis was contained in the cell pellet of centrifuged sputum (unpublished observations). Neutrophil-derived lysozyme plays a major role in the intracellular destruction of ingested bacteria, through the development of phagolysosomes with primary (or azurophilic) and secondary granules (14, 15), and in the extracellular control of colonization of the mucosa (16), through exocytosis of secondary granules (17, 18). By contrast, MPO is the most abundant enzyme in the primary granule; it is responsible for oxygen-dependent catalytic reactions between hydrogen peroxidase and chlorides to form hypochlorous acid, and is thus largely intracellular (14, 15). These different transport characteristics are consistent with the relative difference in lysozyme and MPO concentrations in culture supernatants, as found in the present study. Furthermore, the lack of effect of virus infection on release of MPO as found in the study reflects the maintenance of cell integrity. Both T-cell-dependent recruitment and activation of neutrophils (14, 19), and the consequent autocrine mechanisms that maintain activated neutrophils within the bronchial lumen (3, 20), contribute to the significant functional differences noted between blood and sputum neutrophils. The higher levels of lysozyme stores within the sputum neutrophil, and the greater and more sustained release of lysozyme in cultures of sputum as compared with blood neutrophils, reflect this altered phenotype. Synthesis of granule contents is considered to occur within the bone marrow before the neutrophil is released into the bloodstream (16). It is unclear whether the increase in sputum neutrophil lysozyme stores reflect reactivated lysozyme synthesis or uptake from the environment. In the lower respiratory tract, both AM and neutrophils are important in host defense against bacterial infection, though they differ from blood neutrophils by continuously synthesizing lysozyme (12, 17). Macrophages secrete lysozyme in amounts greatly exceeding its intracellular stores, whereas blood neutrophils retain the enzyme in lysosomes, releasing it during degranulation (17). Study of lysozyme synthesis in sputum neutrophils may provide an explanation for the increase in intracellular stores of this enzyme.

The mechanism by which influenza A virus inhibits neutrophil function is not entirely clear. The virus enters the cell after binding to the hemagglutinin receptor on the cell surface (21, 22). Recent studies with blood neutrophils show that exposure to influenza A virus inhibits bactericidal activity directed against Staphylococcus aureus, as a consequence of defective formation of phagolysosomes involving primary granules (23). The inhibition of release of lysozyme into culture medium induced by infection with influenza A virus suggests impaired exocytosis, also reflecting defective membrane fusion. Such a mechanism would be consistent with the retention of cell structure (with no leakage from the primary granule) in infected cells, and the time course of 2 h for diminished lysozyme secretion by noninfected cells observed in our study would reflect depletion of a small intracellular compartment (associated with secondary granules), with a decrease of only 10% of the total intracellular lysozyme content. The fairly constant lysozyme secretion rate of infected cells over the 2-h period would then reflect a longer maintenance of this minor pool, owing to the membrane fusion defect induced by infection. An alternate mechanism for the disturbed transport dynamics of lysozyme would be a loss of inhibition caused either by the neutrophil becoming refractory to the effect of virus (24) or by the virus eluting from the cell or becoming damaged.

The difference between the effect of influenza A and influenza B virus on neutrophil lysozyme release and bactericidal activity is consistent with epidemiologic evidence of greater morbidity and mortality following infection with strains of influenza A virus (25). Morbidity and mortality usually involve secondary bacterial infection, which would occur in subjects with lung disease and in the elderly, whose airways are often colonized by bacteria (26, 27). The sudden reduction in the capacity to control bacterial colonization that would follow influenza A virus infection of sputum neutrophils could be critical in the pathogenesis of clinical airways infection with bacteria, and in the subsequent development of pneumonia. Additional mechanisms promoting bacterial infection after influenza virus infection include a specific direct effect on nontypeable Hemophilus influenzae, as well as nonspecific damage to airways defense mechanisms (28). Subjects with chronic lung disease and a low frequency of recurrent acute infectious episodes have significantly lower levels of lysozyme in their saliva than do matched subjects with a high rate of acute episodes (7, 29).

The present study thus provides the first direct evidence of an acute and significant impact of influenza A virus on the protective function of the intrabronchial neutrophil. It identifies a mechanism for the morbidity and mortality caused by bacterial infection of the bronchoalveolar space following infection with influenza A virus.

    Footnotes

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Gerald Pang, Ph.D., Discipline of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. E-mail: mdgp{at}mail.newcastle.edu.au

(Received in original form December 7, 1998 and in revised form August 9, 1999).

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Melissa Musicka and Sisters Rachel Robinson and Maria Gillis for technical assistance in this study.

Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

    References
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Dunkley, M. L., A. W. Cripps, P. Reinbott, and R. L. Clancy. 1995. Immunity to respiratory Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: the role gut-derived T helper cells and immune serum. In J. McGhee, J. Mestecky, H. Tlasakova, and J. Sterzl, editors. Advances in Mucosal Immunology. Plenum Press, New York. 771-775.

2. Dunkley, M. L., A. W. Cripps, and R. L. Clancy. 1995. T cells and IFN-gamma in pulmonary immunity to Pseudomonas aeruginosa after intestinal immunization (abstract). Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 149: A872 .

3. Pang, G., M. Ortega, R. Zhigang, G. Reeves, and R. L. Clancy. 1997. Autocrine modulation of IL-8 production by sputum neutrophils in chronic bronchial sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155: 726-731 [Abstract].

4. Clancy, R. L., A. W. Cripps, K. Maree-Allen, S. Yeung, and M. Engel. 1985. Oral immunization with killed Haemophilus influenzae for protection against acute bronchitis in chronic obstructive lung disease. Lancet 2: 1395-1397 [Medline].

5. Tandon, M. K., and V. A. Gebski. 1991. A controlled trial of a killed Haemophilus influenzae vaccine for prevention of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Aust. N.Z. J. Med. 21: 427-432 [Medline].

6. Thompson, A. B., T. Bohling, F. Payvandi, and S. I. Renner. 1990. Lower respiratory tract lactoferrin and lysozyme arise primarily in the airways and are associated with chronic bronchitis. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 115: 148-158 [Medline].

7. Taylor, D. C., A. W. Cripps, and R. L. Clancy. 1995. A possible role for lysozyme in determining acute exacerbation in chronic bronchitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 102: 406-416 [Medline].

8. Iacono, V. J., S. M. Zove, B. L. Grossbard, J. J. Pollock, and L. S. Greene. 1985. Lysozyme mediated aggregation and lysis of the periodontal microorganism Capnocytophagia gingivalis 2010.  Infect. Immun. 47: 457-464 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

9. Taylor, D. C., A. W. Cripps, and R. L. Clancy. 1990. Inhibition of adhesion of Haemophilus influenzae to buccula cells by respiratory secretion. Immunol. Cell Biol. 68: 335-342 .

10. Palese, P., and J. L. Schulman. 1976. Differences in RNA patterns of influenza viruses. J. Virol. 17: 876-884 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

11. Taylor, D. C., A. W. Cripps, and R. L. Clancy. 1992. Measurement of lysozyme in biological fluids by an enzyme-linked immunoassay. J. Immunol. Methods 146: 55-61 [Medline].

12. Konstan, M. W., W. P. Chen, J. M. Sherman, M. J. Thomassen, R. E. Wood, and T. F. Toat. 1981. Human lung lysozyme: sources and properties. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 123: 120-124 .

13. Pang, G. T., R. L. Clancy, and G. E. Reeves. 1995. Isolation and functional characterization of T cells from human sputum. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 102: 642-648 [Medline].

14. Sibille, Y., and H. Y. Reynolds. 1990. Macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophils in lung defense and injury. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 141: 417-501 .

15. Buret, A., M. Dunkley, R. L. Clancy, and A. W. Cripps. 1993. Effector mechanisms of intestinally induced immunity to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lung: role of neutrophils and leukotriene B4. Infect. Immun. 61: 671-679 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

16. Johnson, K. J., J. Varani, and J. E. Smolen. 1992. Neutrophil activation and function in health and disease. In R. G. Coffey, editor. Granulocyte Responses to Cytokines: Basic and Clinical Research. Marcel Dekker, New York. 1-46.

17. Haneberg, B., J. Glette, I. Talstad, S. Sornes, and C. Solberg. 1984. In vitro release of lysozymes from monocytes and granulocytes. J. Leukoc. Biol. 35: 573-582 [Abstract].

18. Root, R. K., and M. S. Cohen. 1981. The microbial mechanisms of human neutrophils and eosinophils. Rev. Infect. Dis. 3: 565-597 [Medline].

19. Wallace, F. J., R. L. Clancy, and A. W. Cripps. 1989. Animal model demonstration of enhanced clearance of notypeable Hemophilus influenzae from the respiratory tract after antigen stimulation of gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140: 311-316 [Medline].

20. Gordon, L. I., S. D. Douglas, N. E. Kay, O. Yamada, E. F. Osserman, and H. S. Jacob. 1979. Modulation of neutrophil function by lysozyme. Potential feedback system of inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 64: 226-232 .

21. Cassidy, L. F., D. S. Lyles, and J. Abramson. 1989. Depression of polymorphonuclear leukocyte functions by purified influenza virus haemagglutination and sialic acid-binding lectins. J. Immunol. 142: 4401-4406 [Abstract].

22. Hartshone, K. L., L. S. Lious, M. R. Mitchell, M. M. Kazhdan, J. L. Tauber, and A. I. Tauber. 1995. Neutrophil deactivation by influenza A virus: role of hemagglutin binding to specific sialic acid-bearing cellular proteins. J. Immunol. 154: 3952-3960 [Abstract].

23. Abramson, J. S., J. C. Lewis, D. S. Lyles, and K. A. Heller. 1982. Inhibition of neutrophil lysosome-phagosome fusion associated with influenza virus infection in vitro. J. Clin. Invest. 69: 1393-1397 .

24. Oliver, J. M.. 1978. Cell biology of leukocyte abnormalities---membrane and cycloskeletal function in normal and defective cells: a review. Am. J. Pathol. 93: 221-270 [Abstract].

25. Matsuzaki, Y., and K. Nakamura. 1997. The virological, epidemiological and clinical features of influenza A, B and C viruses. Jpn. J. Clin. Med. 17: 2515-2520 .

26. Schwartzmann, S. W., J. L. Adler, R. J. Sullivan, and W. M. Marine. 1971. Bacterial pneumonia during the Hong Kong influenza epidemic of 1968-1969. Arch. Intern. Med. 127: 1037-1041 [Medline].

27. Glezen, W. P.. 1982. Serious morbidity and mortality associated with influenza virus epidemics. Epidemiol. Rev. 4: 25-44 [Free Full Text].

28. Dunkley, M., and R. Clancy. 1997. A rodent model of concurrent respiratory infection with influenza virus and gram-negative bacteria: synergistic infection and protection by oral immunization. In A. J. Husband, K. W. Beagley, R. L. Clancy, A. M. Collins, A. W. Cripps, and D. L. Emery, editors. Advances in Mucosal Immunology. University of Sydney Press, Sydney. 279-288.

29. Taylor, D. C., R. L. Clancy, A. W. Cripps, H. Butt, L. Bartlett, and K. Murree-Allen. 1994. An alteration in the host-parasite relationship in subjects with chronic bronchitis prone to recurrent episodes of acute bronchitis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 72: 143-151 [Medline].





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
E. C. Oliveira, B. Lee, and G. L. Colice
Influenza in the Intensive Care Unit
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 80 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. F. Barker
Bronchiectasis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 2, 2002; 346(18): 1383 - 1393.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Tuberculosis, Lung Infections, and Interstitial Lung Disease in AJRCCM 2000
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): 1774 - 1788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PANG, G.
Right arrow Articles by REEVES, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PANG, G.
Right arrow Articles by REEVES, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2000 American Thoracic Society