|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Airway hyperresponsiveness to a wide variety of bronchoconstrictor agonists is a characteristic finding in patients with current, symptomatic asthma. The agonists include inhaled pharmacological agonists, such as histamine (1) acting on airway H1 receptors, the cholinergic agonist methacholine (2) acting on airway M3 receptors, the cysteinyl-leukotrienes (3) acting on airway Cys-LT1 receptors, and the stimulatory prostaglandins (PG)D2 (4) and PGF2a (5) likely acting on airway TP receptors. These agonists are considered to be direct stimuli causing bronchoconstriction in individuals with asthma, because their action is directly on specific airway receptors.
Airway hyperresponsiveness is also present to a number of physical stimuli such as exercise (6), isocapnic hyperventilation of cold, dry air (7), and hypo- and hypertonic aerosols (8). The bronchoconstriction that develops after exposure to the physical stimuli is indirect, because it occurs through the release of constrictor mediators from cells within the airways, which subsequently act on their specific receptors to mediate bronchoconstriction.
Another important indirect stimulus for bronchoconstriction in many individuals with asthma is environmental allergens. The responses after inhaled allergens are often quite different from those after the other indirect stimuli, in that the acute bronchoconstrictor responses are often followed by the development of late-phase bronchoconstrictor responses (9), airway inflammation (10), and an increase in airway hyperresponsiveness (11). The focus of this article is to evaluate the evidence that the cysteinyl-leukotrienes (LT) C4, D4, and E4 are released in asthmatic airways and are the main cause of bronchoconstriction after exposure to exercise and environmental allergens, and of the changes in airway hyperresponsiveness after the inhalation of allergen.
| |
EXERCISE-INDUCED BRONCHOCONSTRICTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The term "exercise-induced asthma" has often been used to describe the bronchoconstriction that occurs after exercise; however, this is a misnomer, as exercise, unlike allergen inhalation (12) or occupational sensitizers (13), is not known to cause asthma, but rather causes bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. Thus, the term exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is to be preferred.
Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction occurs in 70-80% of patients with current symptomatic asthma, and is more likely to occur in patients with moderate to severely increased airway responsiveness. Indeed, for any given exercise challenge, the magnitude of the resulting bronchoconstriction is correlated with the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness (14). This means that in many patients with mild, episodic asthma, who, in general, have mildly increased airway responsiveness, even strenuous exercise does not cause bronchoconstriction.
Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction occasionally occurs during exercise itself. Much more commonly, bronchodilation occurs during exercise, and this lasts for 1-3 min after exercise (15). This is followed by the onset of bronchoconstriction, beginning by 3 min, which generally peaks by 10-15 min and has resolved by 60 min (Figure 1). Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is likely caused by the efforts of the airways to condition to body temperature and to fully humidify the increased volumes of air inhaled during exercise (16).
|
| |
EXERCISE REFRACTORINESS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1966 McNeill and colleagues (17) identified that, in many asthmatic patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, the episode of bronchoconstriction is followed by a period during which exercise causes less bronchoconstriction, and that with repeated bouts of exercise the bronchoconstriction can be abolished. Subsequently, Edmunds and coworkers (18) labeled this effect as exercise refractoriness and noted that the refractory period after exercise generally lasts less than 4 h. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain exercise refractoriness. These have included depletion of preformed mediators from mast cells; prolonged protection afforded by increases in catecholamines released during the first exercise challenge; and release of inhibitory mediators during exercise bronchoconstriction, which partially protects the airways against repeated episodes of bronchoconstriction.
| |
CYSTEINYL-LEUKOTRIENES AND EXERCISE- INDUCED BRONCHOCONSTRICTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cysteinyl-leukotrienes are, overall, the most important mediators causing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in individuals with asthma. This was not immediately obvious from the initial studies, which attempted to measure mediator release in the airways after exercise by measuring the excretion of urinary LTE4 (19). However, a subsequent study of children with asthma did demonstrate an increase in urinary LTE4 after exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (20). The most compelling evidence of an important role for the cysteinyl-leukotrienes comes from a number of studies that have demonstrated marked attenuation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction after pretreatment with a variety of different Cys-LT1 receptor antagonists, thereby blocking the action of the cysteinyl-leukotrienes on their receptors in human airways. Receptor antagonists such as MK-571 (21), zafirlukast [Accolate, either given orally (22) or by inhalation (23)], montelukast (Singulair) (24), or cinalukast (25) inhibit the maximal bronchoconstrictor response after exercise by between 50 and 80%, greatly shortening the time to recovery of normal lung function, and thereby markedly reducing the time-response curve. Indeed, in 30-50% of subjects with asthma studied, these receptor antagonists completely inhibit the response. The long-lasting receptor antagonist cinalukast reduced the area under the time-response curve after exercise by > 80% in subjects with asthma, and this effect lasted more than 8 h after dosing (25) (Figure 2). An even longer duration of protection was achieved with montelukast (24). There is heterogeneity among subjects, in that in some subjects interruption of the leukotriene cascade results in a complete inhibition of the bronchospastic response to exercise whereas in others this intervention has no effect. This indicates that the pathways leading to bronchoconstriction after exercise vary among individuals with asthma, and that in some, mediators other than the leukotrienes may be more important bronchoconstrictor agonists.
|
| |
INHIBITORY PROSTAGLANDINS AND EXERCISE- INDUCED REFRACTORINESS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibitory prostaglandins are important in causing tachyphylaxis to the bronchoconstrictor effects of histamine in subjects with asthma. This has been demonstrated by Manning and colleagues (26), who demonstrated histamine tachyphylaxis to repeated challenges with inhaled histamine, which lasted at least 6 h. This effect was abolished by pretreatment with the cycloxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (26), implicating the release of inhibitory prostaglandins in causing this response. In addition, pretreatment with exogenous oral PGE1 reduces airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine and methacholine (27). Histamine tachyphylaxis is mediated by stimulation of histamine H2 receptors, as pretreatment with the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine prevented histamine tachyphylaxis in subjects with asthma (28). The cell(s) of origin of this prostanoid is not yet known, but it likely originates from a structural cell in the airway epithelium (29) or airway smooth muscle (30).
As a result of these studies, we postulated that histamine released after exercise (31) causes bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma, but also results in exercise refractoriness through inhibitory prostaglandin released by stimulation of histamine H2 receptors. This was supported by studies that demonstrated that pretreatment with indomethacin prevented the development of exercise refractoriness (32, 33), implicating the release of an inhibitory prostaglandin in mediating this response. However, several subsequent studies suggested that this hypothesis is incorrect. This is because exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is markedly attenuated, and indeed in some subjects abolished, by pretreatment with Cys-LT1 receptor antagonist (21, 22, 25). This indicates that the cysteinyl-leukotrienes, rather than histamine, are the main mediator responsible for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Also, pretreatment with the H2 receptor antagonists cimetidine or ranitidine, which effectively prevent histamine tachyphylaxis, did not prevent exercise refractoriness (34). Therefore, histamine-induced inhibitory prostaglandin release did not appear to be the cause of exercise refractoriness.
To explain these diverse findings, we speculated that stimulation of the Cys-LT1 receptor by the cysteinyl-leukotrienes after exercise may result in inhibitory prostaglandin release and the development of exercise refractoriness. This hypothesis was supported by studies that demonstrated that tachyphylaxis to inhaled LTD4 occurs in subjects with asthma, that cross-tachyphylaxis exists between exercise and inhaled LTD4, and that this cross-tachyphylaxis was prevented by pretreatment with the cycloxygenase inhibitor flurbiprofen (35). Also, inhaled PGE2 markedly attenuates exercise broncoconstriction (36) (Figure 3). Therefore, it appears that cysteinyl-leukotrienes are released in response to exercise. This results in bronchoconstriction, but also in the release of inhibitory prostaglandins, such as PGE2, which partially attenuates further exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
|
| |
ALLERGEN-INDUCED AIRWAY RESPONSES. |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The inhalation of environmental allergens is overall the most important cause of asthma. Inhalation of allergens by sensitized subjects results in bronchoconstriction, which develops within 10 min of the inhalation, reaches a maximum within 30 min, and generally resolves within 1-3 h, the early asthmatic response (EAR) (9). In some subjects who develop an early asthmatic response, the bronchoconstriction persists and either does not return to baseline values or recurs after 3-4 h and reaches a maximum over the next few hours, the late asthmatic response (LAR) (9), and may last 24 h or more.
Allergen inhalation can also result in a transient increase in airway hyperresponsiveness that has been described to occur as early as 3 h after allergen inhalation (37) and that can persist for days or weeks after allergen inhalation (11). In general, however, allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness lasts 2-4 d (11). Allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness is most marked in subjects who develop late responses (11), although small and transient changes also occur in individuals with isolated early responses.
Allergen-induced late responses and airway hyperresponsiveness are associated with airway inflammation (10), with numbers of activated airway eosinophils and metachromatic cells being increased at 7-8 h and eosinophils further increased 24 h after allergen inhalation (38). The appearance of metachromatic cells and activated eosinophils in the airways likely explains the development of late responses.
| |
CYSTEINYL-LEUKOTRIENES AND ALLERGEN RESPONSES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The bronchoconstriction that occurs during the early and late responses is in large part caused by allergen-induced release of cysteinyl-leukotrienes. This was initially suggested by Brocklehurst (39), who demonstrated the production of slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A) after sensitized lung fragments were challenged by specific allergens. SRS-A is now known to consist of the cysteinyl-leukotrienes (40).
Several investigators have demonstrated increases in urinary LTE4 after allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (41, 42). The increases in urinary LTE4 were significantly correlated, in one study, with the magnitude of the bronchoconstriction (41). The best evidence, however, of a central role for the cysteinyl-leukotrienes in causing allergen-induced bronchoconstriction is suggested by the observations that a number of different LTD4 receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors have been demonstrated to markedly attenuate bronchoconstrictor responses after allergen inhalation (43) (Figure 4). These studies have indicated that LTD4 antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors attenuate allergen-induced early responses by up to 80% (43, 44), and also attenuate the late response by up to 50% (44), suggesting that, as inhaled leukotriene D4 does not itself cause the development of late responses (47), newly generated cysteinyl-leukotrienes, possibly from inflammatory cells, such as eosinophils recruited into the airways during the late asthmatic response (10, 38), are partially responsible for the bronchoconstriction during this response. The component of allergen-induced early and late responses not influenced by antileukotrienes is caused by histamine release (48).
|
While consistent results from several studies have established a role for Cys-LTs in the pathogenesis of the EAR and LAR, a role for Cys-LTs in the development of allergen-induced airway hyperresonsiveness (AHR) is less certain. Taylor and colleagues (43) observed a significant attenuation of AHR 6 h after allergen inhalation following pretreatment with the Cys-LT receptor antagonist ICI-204,219, but other investigators (45, 46) were unable to confirm this finding 24 and 30 h after allergen inhalation following treatment with the 5-LO-activating protein (FLAP) antagonists MK-886 and MK-0591, respectively. One study (49) has demonstrated significant attenuation of allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in subjects with asthma 24 h after allergen inhalation (Figure 5). This difference is likely caused by the fact that previously reported studies were insufficiently powered to demonstrate such an effect on allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (50).
|
Allergen-induced airway inflammation may also be due in part to the release of cysteinyl-leukotrienes. Inhaled LTE4 has been shown to cause eosinophil infiltration into airway biopsies from subjects with asthma, an effect not seen with inhaled methacholine (51). Also, one study has shown that pretreatment with the Cys-LT1 receptor antagonist has been shown to attenuate allergen-induced influx into the airways after segmental allergen challenge (52). These studies suggest that the cysteinyl-leukotrienes, released as a result of allergen inhalation, may play a role in causing allergen-induced airway inflammation. However, cysteinyl-leukotrienes may not act directly to recruit eosinophils after allergen inhalation. While LTD4 does not cause eosinophil chemotaxis in vitro, one group of investigators has shown that inhaled LTD4 caused increases in eosinophils in induced sputum from subjects with asthma (53); however, they also demonstrated a similar effect with inhaled methacholine, suggesting that the sputum eosinophilia was a nonspecific effect in their studies. In one study, we have compared and contrasted the effects of inhaled allergen and inhaled LTD4 in causing sputum eosinophilia in a group of subjects with allergic asthma, known to develop allergen-induced late responses. This study has demonstrated that in contrast to inhaled allergen, LTD4 did not increase sputum eosinophil numbers. This suggests that while LTD4 may be necessary for allergen-induced airway eosinophilia, it is not sufficient and must be involved as a cofactor with other mediators.
| |
CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The release of cysteinyl-leukotrienes is the most important cause of bronchoconstriction after inhaled environmental allergens in subjects with atopic asthma and of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. In addition, the cysteinyl-leukotrienes are also important in causing allergen-induced late responses and possibly eosinophil influx into the airways. The cysteinyl-leukotrienes also appear to initiate the release of inhibitory prostaglandins, which attenuate subsequent bronchoconstrictor responses to themselves, which is responsible for the development of exercise refractoriness with repeated exercise challenges.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to P. M. O'Byrne, M.D., Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5 Canada. E-mail: obyrnep{at}fhs.mcmaster.ca.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Cockcroft, D. W., D. N. Killian, J. J. Mellon, and F. E. Hargreave. 1977. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin. Allergy 7: 235-243 [Medline].
2. Juniper, E. F., P. A. Frith, and F. E. Hargreave. 1981. Airway responsiveness to histamine and methacholine: relationship to minimum treatment to control symptoms of asthma. Thorax 36: 575-579 [Abstract].
3. Adelroth, E., M. M. Morris, F. E. Hargreave, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1986. Airway responsiveness to leukotrienes C4 and D4 and to methacholine in patients with asthma and normal controls. N. Engl. J. Med. 315: 480-484 [Abstract].
4.
Beasley, R. C.,
R. L. Featherstone,
M. K. Church,
P. Rafferty,
J. G. Varby,
A. Harris,
C. Robinson, and
S. T. Holgate.
1989.
Effect of a
thromboxane receptor antagonist on PGD2- and allergen-induced bronchoconstriction.
J. Appl. Physiol.
66:
1685-1693
5. Thomson, N. C., R. Roberts, J. Bandouvakis, H. Newball, and F. E. Hargreave. 1981. Comparison of bronchial responses to prostaglandin F2 alpha and methacholine. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 68: 392-398 [Medline].
6. Anderson, S. D.. 1985. State of the art: exercise-induced asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 87S: 191-195 .
7. O'Byrne, P. M., G. Ryan, M. Morris, D. McCormack, N. L. Jones, J. L. Morse, and F. E. Hargreave. 1982. Asthma induced by cold air and its relation to nonspecific bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 125: 281-285 [Medline].
8. Anderson, S. D., R. E. Schoeffel, and M. Finney. 1983. Evaluation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions for provocation testing in patients with asthma. Thorax 38: 284-291 [Abstract].
9. O'Byrne, P. M., J. Dolovich, and F. E. Hargreave. 1987. Late asthmatic responses. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 136: 740-751 [Medline].
10. de Monchy, J. G., H. F. Kauffman, P. Venge, G. H. Koeter, H. M. Jansen, H. J. Sluiter, and K. De Vries. 1985. Bronchoalveolar eosinophilia during allergen-induced late asthmatic reactions. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 131: 373-376 [Medline].
11. Cartier, A., N. C. Thomson, P. A. Frith, R. Roberts, and F. E. Hargreave. 1982. Allergen-induced increase in bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to the late asthmatic response and change in airway caliber. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 70: 170-177 [Medline].
12. Cockcroft, D. W., R. E. Ruffin, J. Dolovich, and F. E. Hargreave. 1977. Allergen-induced increase in non-allergic bronchial reactivity. Clin. Allergy 7: 503-513 [Medline].
13. Chan-Yeung, M., and S. Lam. 1986. Occupational asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 133: 686-703 [Medline].
14. Anderton, R. C., M. T. Cuff, P. A. Frith, D. W. Cockroft, J. L. Morse, N. L. Jones, and F. E. Hargreave. 1979. Bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine and exercise. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 63: 315-320 [Medline].
15.
Gelb, A. F.,
D. P. Tashkin,
J. D. Epstein,
H. Gong Jr., and
N. Zamel.
1985.
Exercise-induced bronchodilation in asthma.
Chest
87:
196-201
16. McFadden, E. R. Jr., and R. H. Ingram Jr.. 1979. Exercise-induced asthma: observations on the initiating stimulus. N. Engl. J. Med. 301: 763-769 [Medline].
17. McNeill, R. S., J. R. Nairn, J. S. Millar, and C. G. Ingram. 1966. Exercise-induced asthma. Q. J. Med. 137: 55-67 .
18. Edmunds, A. T., M. Tooley, and S. Godfrey. 1978. The refractory period after exercise-induced asthma: its duration and relation to the severity of exercise. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 117: 247-254 [Medline].
19. Taylor, I. K., R. Wellings, G. W. Taylor, and R. W. Fuller. 1992. Urinary leukotriene E4 excretion in exercise induced bronchoconstriction. J. Appl. Physiol. 145: 743-748 .
20. Kikawa, Y., T. Miyanomae, Y. Inoue, M. Saito, A. Nakai, Y. Shigematsu, S. Hosoi, and M. Sudo. 1992. Urinary leukotriene E4 after exercise challenge in children with asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 89: 1111-1119 [Medline].
21. Manning, P. J., R. M. Watson, D. J. Margolskee, V. C. Williams, J. I. Schwartz, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1990. Inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by MK-571, a potent leukotriene D4-receptor antagonist. N. Engl. J. Med. 323: 1736-1739 [Abstract].
22. Finnerty, J. P., R. Wood-Baker, H. Thomson, and S. T. Holgate. 1992. Role of leukotrienes in exercise-induced asthma: inhibitory effect of ICI 204219, a potent leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145: 746-749 [Medline].
23. Makker, H. K., L. C. Lau, H. W. Thomson, S. M. Binks, and S. T. Holgate. 1993. The protective effect of inhaled leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist ICI 204,219 against exercise-induced asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 147: 1413-1418 [Medline].
24.
Leff, J. A.,
W. W. Busse,
D. S. Pearlman,
E. A. Bronsky,
J. Kemp,
L. Hendeles,
R. Dockhorn,
S. Kundu,
J. Zhang,
B. C. Seidenberg, and
T. F. Reiss.
1998.
Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for
the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
N. Engl. J. Med.
339:
147-152
25. Adelroth, E., M. D. Inman, E. Summers, D. Pace, M. Modi, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1997. Prolonged protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by the leukotriene D4-receptor antagonist cinalukast. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 99: 210-215 [Medline].
26.
Manning, P. J.,
G. L. Jones, and
P. M. O'Byrne.
1987.
Tachyphylaxis to
inhaled histamine in asthmatic subjects.
J. Appl. Physiol.
63:
1572-1577
27. Manning, P. J., C. G. Lane, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1989. The effect of oral prostaglandin E1 on airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Pulm. Pharmacol. 2: 121-124 [Medline].
28. Henriksen, J. M., and A. Wenzel. 1984. Effect of an intranasally administered corticosteroid (budesonide) on nasal obstruction, mouth breathing, and asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 130: 1014-1018 [Medline].
29.
Leikauf, G. D.,
I. F. Ueki,
J. A. Nadel, and
J. H. Widdicombe.
1985.
Bradykinin stimulates Cl secretion and prostaglandin E2 release by
canine tracheal epithelium.
Am. J. Physiol.
248:
F48-F55
30. Manning, P. M., G. L. Jones, C. G. Lane, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1988. Histamine-induced prostaglandin E2 release from canine tracheal smooth muscle is inhibited by H2-receptor blockade (abstract). Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 137: A373 .
31. Barnes, P. J., and M. J. Brown. 1981. Venous plasma histamine in exercise- and hyperventilation-induced asthma in man. Clin. Sci. 61: 159-162 [Medline].
32. O'Byrne, P. M., E. H. Walters, H. Aizawa, L. M. Fabbri, M. J. Holtzman, and J. A. Nadel. 1984. Indomethacin inhibits the airway hyperresponsiveness but not the neutrophil influx induced by ozone in dogs. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 130: 220-224 [Medline].
33. Margolskee, D. J., B. G. Bigby, and H. A. Boushey. 1988. Indomethacin blocks airway tolerance to repetitive exercise but not to eucapnic hyperpnea in asthmatic subjects. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 137: 842-846 [Medline].
34. Manning, P. J., R. Watson, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1992. The effects of H2-receptor antagonists on exercise refractoriness in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 90: 125-126 [Medline].
35. Manning, P. J., R. M. Watson, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1993. Exercise- induced refractoriness in asthmatic subjects involves leukotriene and prostaglandin interdependent mechanisms. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 148: 950-954 [Medline].
36. Melillo, E., K. L. Woolley, P. J. Manning, R. M. Watson, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1994. Effect of inhaled PGE2 on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatis subjects. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 149: 1138-1141 [Abstract].
37. Durham, S. R., C. F. Craddock, W. O. Cookson, and M. K. Benson. 1988. Increases in airway responsiveness to histamine precede allergen-induced late asthmatic responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 82: 764-770 [Medline].
38. Choudry, N. B., R. Watson, F. E. Hargreave, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1993. Time course of inflammatory cells in sputum after allergen inhalation in asthmatic subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 91: 64A .
39. Brocklehurst, W. E.. 1960. The release of histamine and formation of a slow reacting substance (SRS-A) during anaphylactic shock. J. Physiol. 151: 416-435 .
40.
Samuelsson, B..
1983.
Leukotrienes: mediators of immediate hypersensitivity reactions and inflammation.
Science
220:
568-575
41. Manning, P. J., J. Rokach, J. L. Malo, D. Ethier, A. Cartier, Y. Girard, S. Charleson, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1990. Urinary leukotriene E4 levels during early and late asthmatic responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 86: 211-220 [Medline].
42. Taylor, G. W., I. Taylor, P. Black, N. H. Maltby, N. Turner, R. W. Fuller, and C. T. Dollery. 1989. Urinary leukotriene E4 after antigen challenge and in acute asthma and allergic rhinitis. Lancet i: 584-588 .
43. Taylor, I. K., K. M. O'Shaughnessy, R. W. Fuller, and C. T. Dollery. 1991. Effect of a cysteinylleukotriene receptor antagonist, ICI 204-219, on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and airway hyperactivity in atopic subjects. Lancet 337: 690-694 [Medline].
44. Hamilton, A. L., R. M. Watson, G. Wyile, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1997. A 5-lipoxygenase activating protein antagonist, Bay 1005, attenuates both early and late phase allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. Thorax 52: 348-354 [Abstract].
45. Diamant, Z., M. C. Timmers, H. van der Veen, B. S. Friedman, M. De Smet, M. Depre, D. Hilliard, E. H. Bel, and P. J. Sterk. 1995. The effect of MK-0591, a novel 5-lipoxygenase activating protein inhibitor, on leukotriene biosynthesis and allergen-induced airway responses in asthmatic subjects in vivo. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 95: 42-51 [Medline].
46. Friedman, B. S., E. H. Bel, A. Buntinx, W. Tanaka, Y. H. Han, S. Shingo, R. Spector, and P. Sterk. 1993. Oral leukotriene inhibitor (MK-886) blocks allergen-induced airway responses. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 147: 839-844 [Medline].
47. Higgins, D. A., and P. M. O'Byrne. 1987. Inhaled leukotriene D4 does not cause a late response in atopic subjects. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 79: 141 .
48. Roquet, A., B. Dahlen, M. Kumlin, E. Ihre, G. Anstren, S. Binks, and S. E. Dahlen. 1997. Combined antagonist of leukotrienes and histamine produces predominent inhibition of allergen-induced early and late phase airway obstruction in asthmatics. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155: 1856-1863 [Abstract].
49. Hamilton, A., I. Faiferman, P. Stober, R. M. Watson, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1998. Pranlukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates allergen-induced early and late phase bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthamatic subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102: 177-183 [Medline].
50. Inman, M. D., A. L. Hamilton, H. A. Kerstjens, R. M. Watson, and P. M. O'Byrne. 1998. The utility of methacholine airway responsiveness measurements in evaluating anti-asthma drugs. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 101: 342-348 [Medline].
51. Laitinen, L. A., A. Laitinen, T. Haahtela, V. Vikka, B. W. Spur, and T. H. Lee. 1993. Leukotriene E4 and granulocytic infiltration into asthmatics airways. Lancet 341: 989-990 [Medline].
52.
Calhoun, W. J.,
B. J. Lavins,
M. C. Minkwitz,
R. Evans,
G. J. Gleich, and
J. Cohn.
1998.
Effect of zafirlukast (Accolate) on cellular mediators of
inflammation: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid findings after segmental
allergen challenge.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
157:
1381-1389
53. Diamant, Z., J. T. Hiltermann, E. L. J. van Rensen, P. M. Callenbach, M. Veselic-Charvat, H. van der Veen, J. K. Sont, and P. J. Sterk. 1997. The effect of inhaled leukotriene D4 and methacholine on sputum cell differentials in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155: 1247-1253 [Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Duong, P. Subbarao, E. Adelroth, G. Obminski, T. Strinich, M. Inman, S. Pedersen, and P. M. O'Byrne Sputum Eosinophils and the Response of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction to Corticosteroid in Asthma Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 404 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Philip, D. S. Pearlman, C. Villaran, C. Legrand, T. Loeys, R. B. Langdon, and T. F. Reiss Single-Dose Montelukast or Salmeterol as Protection Against Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 875 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. de Benedictis, M. M. del Giudice, N. Forenza, F. Decimo, D. de Benedictis, and A. Capristo Lack of tolerance to the protective effect of montelukast in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2006; 28(2): 291 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Mickleborough, M. R. Lindley, A. A. Ionescu, and A. D. Fly Protective Effect of Fish Oil Supplementation on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Asthma Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1): 39 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zaitsu, Y. Hamasaki, K. Tsuji, M. Matsuo, I. Fujita, Y. Aoki, E. Ishii, and O. Kohashi Dexamethasone accelerates catabolism of leukotriene C4 in bronchial epithelial cells Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2003; 22(1): 35 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. McCurdy, T. J. Olynych, L. H. Maher, and J. S. Marshall Cutting Edge: Distinct Toll-Like Receptor 2 Activators Selectively Induce Different Classes of Mediator Production from Human Mast Cells J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 1625 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Minoguchi, Y. Kohno, H. Minoguchi, N. Kihara, Y. Sano, H. Yasuhara, and M. Adachi Reduction of Eosinophilic Inflammation in the Airways of Patients With Asthma Using Montelukast Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Asthma, Airway Biology, and Allergic Rhinitis in AJRCCM 2000 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2001; 164(9): 1559 - 1580. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |