Comparison with Albuterol and Ipratropium |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Administration of
-adrenergic agonist bronchodilators to patients with airways obstruction commonly results in transient decreases in PaO2 levels despite bronchodilation, an effect that has been attributed to these drugs' pulmonary vasodilator action. We compared the acute effects on gas exchange of salmeterol with those of albuterol and the anticholinergic agent ipratropium in 20 patients
with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Each agent was given in recommended
dosage on separate days in a double-blind, crossover format, and the patients' arterial blood gases
(ABGs) were measured at baseline and at intervals to 120 min. Small but statistically significant declines in PaO2, the primary outcome variable, were found after administration of both salmeterol and
albuterol. The decline in PaO2 after salmeterol was of lesser magnitude but was more prolonged than
that after albuterol, the greatest mean change being
2.74 ± 0.89 mm Hg (mean ± SEM) at 30 min
after salmeterol, and
3.45 ± 0.92 mm Hg at 20 min after albuterol. Following ipratropium, the corresponding change was
1.32 ± 0.85 mm Hg at 20 min. These declines, which were almost entirely
attributable to increases in the alveolar-arterial difference in oxygen tension
(A-a)DO2 tended to be
more marked in subjects with higher baseline PaO2 values. No subject experienced a decline in PaO2 to
levels below 59 mm Hg. There were no significant differences among the three drugs studied. We
conclude that despite small decreases in PaO2 after each of the three drugs, the declines were small,
transient, and of doubtful clinical significance.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The administration of
-adrenergic agents to patients with airways obstruction often results in a transient decrease in PaO2 despite concomitant bronchodilation (1). This has been attributed to the pulmonary vasodilator action of these agents,
increasing blood flow to poorly ventilated lung regions and
thus increasing ventilation-perfusion inequality, and to a
shuntlike effect (4, 5). In contrast, anticholinergic bronchodilators have been shown to have relatively small effects on arterial blood gases in either stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (6) or in acute exacerbations of COPD
(7). The recent introduction of the long-acting
-adrenergic
agent salmeterol for use in patients with COPD raises the
question of whether salmeterol has effects on gas exchange
that are similar to those of other, more traditional,
-agonists
in these patients.
We report here the results of a three-way crossover study
in which the acute effects of salmeterol inhalation on the arterial blood gas tensions of 20 patients with COPD and arterial
hypoxemia at rest were compared with those of the conventional
-agonist albuterol and the anticholinergic agent ipratropium, both of which are widely used in treating COPD.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Subjects were recruited from the Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital outpatient population on the basis of having an age of more than 50 yr, a cigarette smoking history of more than 10-pack-yr, a clinical history of COPD (8), an FEV1 of less than 70% predicted, an FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 70%, and regular use of at least one bronchodilator. We excluded subjects with unstable comorbidities, any clinical features of asthma (9), an exacerbation of respiratory disease within 1 mo of study, a resting PaO2 of less than 55 mm Hg, or use of long-term oxygen therapy.
Study Agents
The study agents were salmeterol xinafoate (2 puffs, 42 µg), albuterol sulfate (2 puffs, 180 µg), and ipratropium bromide (2 puffs, 36 µg), each given under double-blind conditions from metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) without spacers.
Experimental Protocol
Each subject was studied on 3 d, separated from one another by at least 2 d. On each study day, subjects were required to withhold conventional inhaled bronchodilators for at least 12 h and salmeterol or long-acting theophyllines for at least 24 h before study. Subjects receiving alternate-day oral corticosteroids were studied on nonsteroid days, whereas those receiving an inhaled corticosteroid were instructed to take this as usual, together with all their usual nonpulmonary medications. Subjects reported to the laboratory in the morning, after a light breakfast without caffeinated beverages and without having smoked. After a rest of 15 min, an arterial catheter was placed under local anesthesia in the radial or brachial artery. Samples of arterial blood (5 ml) were removed at 5-min intervals for measurement of PaO2, PaCO2, and pH with a blood gas analyzer (Model 1620; Instrumentation Laboratories, Lexington, MA) that was calibrated daily. The machine output was checked daily with a standard test sample. During the study period, the SD values were ± 0.5 mm Hg for PO2, ± 0.4 mm Hg for PCO2, and ± 0.009 for pH). When consecutive PaO2 levels fell within 3 mm Hg of each other, the mean of the two values was accepted as the baseline PaO2 and the patient received one of the three study treatments under supervision, with the order of treatment being randomized. Blood gas analysis was repeated at 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min, previous studies having shown that the changes at these intervals are relatively short-lived (4). Spirometry was performed at baseline, and was repeated 60 min after administration of each study drug to ensure that each agent had been administered and had had its intended effect on airflow.
The study was approved by the Human Studies Subcommittee of the Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, and each subject gave prior written informed consent.
Analysis of Data
The change in PaO2 after each treatment, from the baseline obtained
on that day, was the primary outcome variable. The magnitude of this
change at each analysis time was compared among treatments. In addition, the area between the PaO2 curve and the baseline value (area
under the curve [AUC]) was calculated with the trapezoidal method.
The AUC calculation included only data from 0 to 90 min after drug
administration, since all variables had reverted to baseline by 90 min.
The paired t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine the significance of differences among agents. Regression
analysis was used to determine whether the change in PaO2 was related to the baseline PaO2 on that day. Secondary outcomes were
changes in PaCO2, pH, and the calculated
(A-a)DO2. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05, without correction for multiple tests.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty of the 24 study subjects completed all three study days
(Table 1). All had a clinical diagnosis of COPD, with a substantial cigarette smoking history, airways obstruction, and arterial hypoxemia.
|
The changes in PaO2 values following drug administration (Figure 1) show small but statistically significant decreases from baseline after each adrenergic agent. Albuterol resulted in the earliest and greatest absolute decline in PaO2, but this was short-lived, being no longer significantly below baseline at 30 min. In comparison, the decline in PaO2 after salmeterol was slightly delayed and of slightly lesser magnitude than that of albuterol at its nadir, but more prolonged. Ipratropium resulted in the smallest declines in PaO2, which did not bring PaO2 significantly below baseline at any time.
|
The area between the PaO2 curve and baseline from 0 to 90 min (AUC0-90min) was greatest for salmeterol (
2.46 ± 1.10 mm Hg/h [mean ± SEM]), next greatest for albuterol (
1.73 ± 1.33 mm Hg/h), and least for ipratropium (
0.48 ± 1.30 mm
Hg/h). There were no statistically significant differences
among drugs either at individual time points or with respect to
AUC0-90 min values.
We sought the largest individual declines in PaO2 in order to determine whether administration of any of the study agents might pose an occasional hazard. After administration of salmeterol, the largest individual decline in PaO2 was from 76 mm Hg at baseline to 63 mm Hg at 60 min after drug administration, the lowest PaO2 in any subject being 59 mm Hg at 60 min. Following albuterol the largest individual decline was from 71.5 to 59 mm Hg at 20 min, this being the lowest PaO2 observed with albuterol. Following ipratropium, the largest individual decline was from a baseline value of 70 mm Hg to 59 mm Hg at 30 min. Thus, none of the treatments resulted in a decline in PaO2 below 59 mm Hg.
Data for PaCO2 (not shown) revealed mean declines of between
0.1 and
1.1 mm Hg for each agent, changes that
were not statistically significantly different from baseline or
among agents. The changes in arterial pH reflected the PaCO2
changes, and were also small and not statistically significant.
Data for changes in
(A-a)DO2 (not shown) were thus qualitatively and quantitatively reciprocal to those for changes in
PaO2.
To further explore the relationship between changes in gas exchange and baseline PaO2, we performed regression analysis of the greatest decline in PaO2 against the baseline PaO2 on that day for each drug. We found for each drug a trend toward a greater decrement in PaO2 in subjects with higher baseline PaO2 values, but none of these changes was statistically significant.
The FEV1 increased from baseline by 0.23 ± 0.05 L (mean ± SEM) at 1 h after salmeterol inhalation, by 0.19 ± 0.04 L after albuterol, and by 0.23 ± 0.05 L after ipratropium (p < 0.005 for each agent), the increases not being significantly different among agents. No adverse effects occurred during the course of the study.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The principal finding of this study was that both salmeterol and albuterol resulted in statistically significant but small and transient decreases in PaO2 below baseline values. These effects tended to be greater than those seen after administration of ipratropium. The maximal change after albuterol occurred earlier and was greater than the maximal change after salmeterol. However, the AUC 0-90min was slightly but not significantly greater after salmeterol than after albuterol, owing to a more prolonged effect of salmeterol than of albuterol, in accord with the known chronology of effects of these two drugs on airflow.
The results of the study also indicate that the average decreases in PaO2 and increases in
(A-a)DO2 were quite small
and of questionable clinical significance. Moreover, there was
a trend (not statistically significant) for greater declines in
PaO2 to occur in subjects with higher baseline PaO2 values, as
has been previously suggested (4). Thus, no subject experienced a decline in PaO2 to below 59 mm Hg
a level that is not
unsafe
following any of the three agents studied.
The observed effects on gas exchange, which are consistent
with previous reports for conventional
-agonists, have been
explained as being due to these drugs' pulmonary vasodilator
effects, abrogating the pulmonary vascular reflexes that act to
minimize ventilation-perfusion mismatching in COPD, and to
possible increases in cardiac output (2, 3). The increase in
(A-a)DO2 after each adrenergic agent used in the present
study accords with this explanation. Additionally, because salmeterol is considerably more specific for
2-receptors than is
albuterol (12), its gas-exchange effects are most likely to be
mediated via
2-receptors on vascular smooth muscle. However, it must be noted that all of the study agents' observed effects on gas exchange were of much shorter duration, by about
an order of magnitude, than their effects on airflow, which
typically persist for 4 to 6 h after albuterol and for 12 h after
salmeterol. One could therefore postulate either that the time-constants for agonist-receptor interaction on vascular smooth
muscle are very much shorter than those for airway smooth muscle, or that alternative, unknown adaptive mechanisms come into
play when vascular reflexes that correct for ventilation-perfusion inequality are overridden by a
-adrenergic agonist.
As previously reported in patients with COPD, the anticholinergic agent examined in our study resulted in only small, statistically insignificant changes in arterial blood gases (6). This has been explained as being due to the very slight effects of anticholinergic agents on the pulmonary vasculature (6).
In conclusion, both salmeterol and albuterol, when taken in
recommended dosage, resulted in significant but small and
transient declines in PaO2 and increases in
(A-a)DO2 that
could be attributed to their pulmonary vasodilator effects. The
effects of salmeterol on gas exchange tended to be slower in
onset and more prolonged than those of albuterol, as is consistent with the chronology of the effects of these agents on airflow. Ipratropium tended to have smaller effects than either of
the adrenergic agents, but there were no statistically significant differences among the three agents' effects on gas exchange, and none had effects that could be considered to pose
a clinical risk either collectively or in individual patients.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to N. J. Gross, M.D., Ph.D., P.O. Box 1485, Hines, IL 60141. E-mail: Gross{at}research.hines.med.va.gov
(Received in original form December 23, 1998 and in revised form February 16, 1999).
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Wilbert Armstrong, B.S., Dwight Wells, R.P.F.T., Robert Vanderbilt, and Frank King, B.S., for excellent technical assistance.
Supported in part by the Veterans Affairs Research Service and a grant from GlaxoWellcome.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Knudson, R. J., and
H. P. Constantine.
1967.
An effect of isoproterenol
on ventilation-perfusion in asthmatic versus normal subjects.
J. Appl.
Physiol.
22:
402-406
2. Tai, E., and J. Read. 1967. Response of blood gas tensions to aminophylline and isoprenaline in patients with asthma. Thorax 22: 543-549 [Medline].
3. Palmer, K. N. V., J. S. Legge, W. F. D. Hamilton, and M. L. Diament. 1970. Comparison of the effect of isoprenaline and salbutamol on spirometry and blood-gas tensions in bronchial asthma. Br. Med. J. 2: 23-24 .
4. Ingram, R. H. Jr., P. E. Krumpe, G. M. Duffel, and B. Maniscalo. 1970. Ventilation-perfusion changes after aerosolized isoproterenol in asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 101: 364-370 [Medline].
5. Wagner, P. D., D. R. Dantzker, V. E. Iacovoni, W. C. Tomlin, and J. B. West. 1978. Ventilation-perfusion inequality in asymptomatic asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 118: 511-524 [Medline].
6. Gross, N. J., and Z. Bankwala. 1987. Effects of an anticholinergic bronchodilator on arterial blood gases of hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, comparison with a beta-adrenergic agent. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 136: 1091-1094 [Medline].
7.
Karpel, J. P.,
J. Pesin,
D. Greenburg, and
A. E. Gentry.
1990.
A comparison of the effects of ipratropium bromide and metaproterenol in
acute exacerbations of COPD.
Chest
98:
835-839
8. American Thoracic Society. 1995. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152(Suppl.): S77-S121 .
9. National Institutes of Health. 1997. Expert Panel Report 2. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. NIH Publication No. 97-4051. 97.
10. Jack, D.. 1991. A way of looking at agonism and antagonism, lessons from albuterol, salmeterol, and other beta-adrenoreceptor agonists. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31: 501 [Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. F. Joos Are beta2-Agonists Safe in Patients with Acute Exacerbations of COPD? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2007; 176(4): 322 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Rodriguez-Roisin COPD exacerbations {middle dot} 5: Management. Thorax, June 1, 2006; 61(6): 535 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Gross Tiotropium Bromide Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1946 - 1953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A Dougherty, B. L Didur, and L. S Aboussouan Long-Acting Inhaled {beta}2-Agonists for Stable COPD Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2003; 37(9): 1247 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |