|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is evidence that eosinophils have an important role in the pathogenesis of allergy and asthma. These cells are regulated by two classes of polypeptides, the colony-stimulating factors, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and the chemokines, such as RANTES and eotaxin. GM-CSF is involved in the production, survival, and functional activation of eosinophils. RANTES and eotaxin regulate the migration of eosinophils to inflammatory sites, but any effect of these chemokines on eosinophil survival is not known. In this study we demonstrate that although GM-CSF promoted eosinophil survival, the specific GM-CSF analogue E21R induced apoptosis of eosinophils. Apoptosis was observed with unstimulated as well as with chemokine (RANTES and eotaxin)- activated eosinophils. Neither RANTES nor eotaxin supported eosinophil survival, and a RANTES antagonist did not affect either cell survival or apoptosis. E21R also induced apoptosis of eosinophils from asthmatic patients. These findings suggest that the GM-CSF receptor may actively control the death as well as the survival of eosinophils, and thus precisely regulate their numbers and activities. Our data also indicate that chemokines are not involved in regulating the lifespan of eosinophils. The introduction of the GM-CSF analogue E21R may offer a novel therapy in inflammatory diseases associated with eosinophil infiltration of different etiologies.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several observations link eosinophils to the development and progression of inflammatory diseases such as allergy and asthma (1). In the case of asthma this is supported by findings of increased concentrations of eosinophils in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), as well as pulmonary deposition of injury-mediating eosinophilic compounds in affected individuals (2).
Two distinct families of polypeptides regulate the fate of eosinophils: the eosinophilopoietic cytokines and the chemo-kines. As for the cytokines, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a potent regulator of eosinophil production and function, and promotes the survival of eosinophils by suppressing apoptosis (programmed cell death) (3, 4). Among the chemokines, both RANTES and eotaxin play important roles in controlling the migration of eosinophils to inflamed tissues (5), but whether they contribute to eosinophil survival is unclear. One way to reduce numbers of tissue eosinophils would be to block each of these factors with specific antagonists. An alternative approach is to use molecules that selectively modulate eosinophil apoptosis (6) rather than using glucocorticoids (7), since severe side effects of steroids limit their therapeutic potential.
We recently generated a GM-CSF analogue (E21R) that was devoid of agonistic activity and selectively antagonized GM-CSF-mediated functions in cell lines (8). Surprisingly, E21R induced apoptosis of certain proliferating hemopoietic cells (9). This prompted us to examine whether E21R could regulate the programmed cell death of eosinophils, and in particular to examine its effect on in vivo-activated and chemo-kine-activated eosinophils. We report here that E21R induced apoptosis of unstimulated eosinophils in the absence of GM-CSF. Furthermore, E21R induced apoptosis of eosinophils activated with either RANTES or eotaxin, whereas a RANTES-antagonist did not affect eosinophil survival. Our data indicate that by regulating eosinophil apoptosis, E21R might offer a useful therapeutic approach in diseases characterized by eosinophilia.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purification and Culturing of Eosinophils
Peripheral blood was collected from nine healthy subjects with differential counts of less than 2% eosinophils, and from nine asthmatic patients with differential counts in which eosinophils ranged from 7 to 16%. Written consent was given by each subject, and the study was approved by ethics committees. The eosinophils were isolated after dextran sedimentation of erythrocytes followed by discontinuous metrizamide gradient separation (Metrizamide; Nycomed, Oslo, Norway), yielding a cell purity above 96%, or were subjected to density centrifugation (Histopaque, Sigma, UK) followed by a negative selection procedure using anti-CD16-coated microbeads and the magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) system (Becton Dickinson, Cowley, UK) (10), yielding a cell purity above 99%. The eosinophils were cultured at 106 cells/ml in RPMI medium supplemented with bicarbonate (0.23% wt/vol), fetal calf serum (FCS) (10% vol/vol), L-glutamine (1.7 mM), penicillin (10.5 µg/ml), and gentamicin (14 µg/ml).
Eosinophilopoietic Cytokines and Chemokines
In our cultures we used human GM-CSF (Genetics Institute, Cambridge, MA) and the GM-CSF analogue E21R (BresaGen, Adelaide, Australia). Recombinant E21R was produced in Escherichia coli as a protein fused to the N-terminus of GM-CSF. Inclusion bodies containing E21R were dissolved and refolded, and the correctly folded E21R was purified by ion-exchange chromatography on Q-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and shown to be > 95% pure as judged by sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
We also used eotaxin and RANTES (100 µg/ml). To some cultures we added an antagonist to RANTES (100 µg/ml) that was made by truncating the N-terminal end of wild-type RANTES, as previously described (11).
Assessment of Eosinophilic Peroxidase and Eosinophil Cationic Protein Release
Purified eosinophils from four asthmatic subjects were stimulated with either GM-CSF (1 ng/ml), E21R (10 µg/ml), or with E21R (10 µg/ml) for 30 min followed by GM-CSF (1 ng/ml) for 30 min. We then added Sephadex G-15 beads (Sigma Chemical Co.) coated with serum for 30 min. Beads incubated with Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) were used as a negative control. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) release was measured in supernatants collected from the eosinophil cultures, using an o-phenylenediamine and H2O2 color change assay (12), and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) release was measured with serum-coated beads and a radioimmunoassay (Pharmacia). EPO and ECP releases were each expressed as a percentage of the total cellular content of the two substances as measured after a freeze-thaw cycle.
Measurement of GM-CSF Production
Eosinophils (106 cells/ml) from asthmatic subjects were cultured for 36 h before supernatants were assayed for concentrations of GM-CSF protein with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; sensitivity > 0.5 pg/ml).
Determination of Eosinophil Apoptosis
Cells were harvested at selected time points, and the numbers of apoptotic cells were quantitated through the assay of reduced binding of propidium iodide to DNA, using flow cytometry (EPICS Profile II; Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL) as described previously (9). Chromosomal DNA was extracted from lysed cells with organic solvents and run on 1.2% agarose gels (9).
Statistics
Each measurement from every subject was done in triplicate, and the corresponding medians were used to calculate mean and SEM values for subjects. We used Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) for data in Table 2. Differences were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni's test, and were considered significant at p < 0.05.
|
| |
RESULTS and DISCUSSION |
|---|
E21R Antagonizes GM-CSF-Stimulated Eosinophil Release of EPO and ECP
We have previously shown that E21R acts as a specific GM-CSF receptor antagonist on human leukemic cells and neutrophils (8). To establish that E21R could also act as a GM-CSF antagonist on eosinophils, we first studied EPO and ECP release from eosinophils collected from asthmatic subjects and cultured with cytokines prior to stimulation with serum-coated beads. Figure 1 shows that E21R itself did not alter either EPO or ECP release. GM-CSF markedly stimulated the release of both EPO and ECP, but this was completely inhibited when E21R was added together with GM-CSF. Winqvist and colleagues showed that the mechanism by which serum-coated beads leads to eosinophil degranulation depends on complement (13). In addition, immunoglobulin complexes (such as IgA- and IgG-coated beads) were shown to be potent stimuli for eosinophil degranulation (14). The eosinophil degranulation by immobilized Ig may be mediated by G proteins and tyrosine kinases (15).
|
Neither interleukin-3 (IL-3)-nor IL-5-stimulated EPO or ECP release were affected upon adding E21R (data not shown).
E21R Induces Apoptosis of Eosinophils from Healthy Subjects
We next examined the effect of E21R on eosinophil lifespan, using cells from healthy subjects. Figure 2A shows that E21R significantly accelerated apoptosis of eosinophils. By 15 h about 80% of eosinophils cultured with E21R (10 µg/ml) were apoptotic, whereas all cells cultured in medium alone or with GM-CSF (10 ng/ml) remained viable. Most eosinophils kept in medium alone died within 36 h, whereas all those in medium supplemented with GM-CSF survived throughout the observation period (Figure 2A), as previously demonstrated (3, 4). Dose-response experiments showed that 10 µg/ml of E21R induced apoptosis of most eosinophils by 15 h (Figure 2B). Conversely, all eosinophils remained viable when GM-CSF at 10 ng/ml or more was added to cultures supplemented with a fixed dose of E21R (10 µg/ml). These results show that the effect of E21R on eosinophil survival was selectively mediated through the GM-CSF receptor complex and not by nonspecific toxicity.
|
We next sought further evidence that E21R induced apoptosis of eosinophils. Figure 3 shows electron microscopic pictures of an eosinophil kept in medium alone (Figure 3A) or with E21R (Figure 3B, 10 µg/ml) for 15 h, the latter showing morphologic features consistent with apoptosis. DNA extracted from these E21R-treated eosinophils had been degrated into low-molecular-weight fragments, whereas DNA from eosinophils kept in medium alone or with GM-CSF (10 ng/ml) remained intact (Figure 3C). Eosinophils kept in medium alone for 36 h also showed morphologic signs of apoptosis (data not shown). These data are consistent with the notion that eosinophils deprived of hemopoietic survival factors undergo apoptosis (16), and suggest that E21R induces an active apoptotic process evidenced at early time points.
|
E21R Induces Apoptosis of Chemokine-Activated Eosinophils
The chemokines RANTES and eotaxin are potent activators of eosinophil function (5), but their role in eosinophil survival is not clear. Although both RANTES and eotaxin stimulated eosinophil migration in vitro (data not shown), Table 1 shows that neither RANTES nor eotaxin altered the survival of eosinophils after 24 h as compared with the survival of cells cultured in medium alone. A RANTES antagonist also failed to influence eosinophil survival, whereas it blocked RANTES-induced eosinophil migration (data not shown), and thus this RANTES antagonist did not behave like E21R. Moreover, E21R induced apoptosis when used alone or in the presence of RANTES and eotaxin (Table 1).
|
E21R Induces Apoptosis of Eosinophils from Asthmatic Patients
We initially found that eosinophils collected from asthmatic
patients survived longer than unstimulated eosinophils from
healthy subiects when cultured in medium alone (data not
shown). This probably reflects former cells' endogeneous production of survival factors such as GM-CSF, since this cytokine was clearly present in supernatants following a 36-h culture
of these cells (Table 2), whereas no GM-CSF was detectable
in supernatants collected from eosinophils of healthy controls.
Table 2 shows that E21R (10 µg/ml) induced apoptosis in all
five cases studied, albeit to a variable degree. The fraction of
apoptotic cells was in every case inversely related both to the
blood differential count of eosinophils (r =
0.91, p < 0.05)
and to eosinophil GM-CSF production (r =
0.94, p < 0.05).
Although a fraction of eosinophils producing GM-CSF died
when cultured with E21R at 10 µg/ml, virtually all eosinophils
were apoptotic at higher concentrations of E21R, with the optimal concentration directly correlating to the amount of GM-CSF being produced (data not shown).
A density shift toward an increased number of hypodense eosinophils in asthmatic patients as compared with normal controls has been suggested as a factor contributing to the disease: hypodense eosinophils have a greater number of various surface receptors and show increased cytotoxicity (4), and immature, hypodense eosinophils enhance their viability by constitutive production of GM-CSF (17). However, no significant difference in cell survival at the 15-h time point was detected when comparing E21R-treated eosinophils from the 23%/24% metrizamide interface with those from the 18%/20% interface (data not shown).
E21R probably affects eosinophil EPO and ECP release and survival via two different mechanisms. Its inhibitory effect on EPO and ECP release most likely results from passive blockade of the GM-CSF receptor (8), since E21R itself had no impact on the release and it had to be present in a thousandfold excess over GM-CSF in order to inhibit EPO and ECP release. This concentration requirement is consistent with the differences in affinity between the GM-CSF analogue E21R and wild-type GM-CSF for the GM-CSF receptor (8).
E21R-induced apoptosis is likely to be the result of an active process, since recent studies of myeloid cells indicate that it involves both transcriptional activation and protein synthesis (9). The data in our study show that by 15 h, E21R induces apoptosis of nearly all eosinophils of healthy subjects. The
mechanism by which it does this is not yet clear, but it is probably not the effect of merely antagonizing endogeneous GM-CSF activity, since unstimulated eosinophils do not have detectable endogeneous messenger RNA (mRNA)for GM-CSF
or detectable GM-CSF protein, in contrast to activated eosinophils (18). Moreover, we have tested four different monoclonal antibodies raised against the specific GM-CSF receptor
subunit, and none of these antibodies replicated the apoptotic action of E21R (data not shown). As a further point, E21R-induced apoptosis requires serine/threonine protein phosphorylation (9), in contrast to the postulated mandatory role
of tyrosine phosphorylation in the antiapoptotic effect mediated by GM-CSF (19).
E21R induced apoptosis of eosinophils cultured with either RANTES or eotaxin. The newly identified receptor CCR-3 mediates functional activation of eosinophils upon binding of either RANTES or eotaxin (20, 21), but its role in regulating eosinophil survival is unknown. Moreover, although the RANTES antagonist can bind to multiple chemokine receptors (11), it had no impact on eosinophil survival. Our findings therefore indicate: (1) that chemokines are not central in the regulation of eosinophil survival or apoptosis; and (2) that engagement of the GM-CSF receptor with E21R leads to eosinophil apoptosis even in the presence of eosinophil-active chemokines.
Xing and coworkers recently showed that overexpression of GM-CSF in vivo in the rat lung induced eosinophilia and fibrotic lesions, suggesting a key role for GM-CSF in certain respiratory disorders such as asthma (22). In addition to being found in eosinophils, mRNA for GM-CSF has been demonstrated in T cells and specimens from respiratory tissue in asthmatic patients (2, 6); however, the possible correlate to actual protein production locally in vivo is not known. Given the dual role of E21R in blocking GM-CSF and in inducing apoptosis of eosinophils, it would be of interest to test its role as a potential new therapeutic agent for asthma and other diseases associated with eosinophilia of different etiologies.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Angel F. Lopez, Division of Human Immunology, Hanson Centre for Cancer Research, IMVS, P.O. Box 14, Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000 S.A., Australia.
(Received in original form December 20, 1996 and in revised form June 4, 1997).
Acknowledgments: E21R was kindly provided by BresaGen, and GM-CSF was a kind gift from the Genetics Institute. Purified eosinophil peroxidase was a kind gift from Dr. N. M. Munoz.
Supported by the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council; the Medical Research Council, UK; and The Asthma and Allergy Foundation of Norway.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Gleich, G. J., and C. R. Adolphson. 1986. The eosinophilic leukocyte: structure and function. Adv. Immunol. 39: 177 [Medline].
2. Corrigan, C. J., and A. B. Kay. 1992. T cells and eosinophils in the pathogenesis of asthma. Immunol. Today 13: 501-507 [Medline].
3.
Begley, C. G.,
A. F. Lopez,
N. A. Nicola,
D. J. Warren,
M. A. Vadas,
C. J. Sanderson, and
D. Metcalf.
1986.
Purified colony-stimulating factors enhance the survival of human neutrophils and eosinophils in
vitro: a rapid and sensitive microassay for colony-stimulating factors.
Blood
68:
162-166
4.
Owen, W. F. Jr.,
M. E. Rothenberg,
D. S. Silberstein,
J. C. Gasson,
R. L. Stevens,
K. F. Austen, and
R. J. Soberman.
1987.
Regulation of human eosinophil viability, density, and function by granulucyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the presence of 3T3 fibroblasts.
J. Exp. Med.
166:
129-141
5.
Kita, H., and
G. J. Gleich.
1996.
Chemokines active on eosinophils: potential roles in allergic inflammation.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
2421-2426
6. Simon, H.-U., and K. Blaser. 1995. Inhibition of programmed eosinophil death: a key pathogenic event for eosinophilia? Immunol. Today 16: 53-55 [Medline].
7. Her, E., J. Frazer, K. F. Austen, and W. F. Owen Jr.. 1991. Eosinophil hematopoietins antagonize the programmed cell death of eosinophils: cytokine and glucocorticoid effects on eosinophils maintained by endothelial cell-conditioned medium. J. Clin. Invest. 88: 1982-1987 .
8.
Hercus, T. R.,
C. J. Bagley,
B. Cambareri,
M. Dottore,
J. Woodcock,
M. A. Vadas,
M. F. Shannon, and
A. F. Lopez.
1994.
Specific human
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antagonists.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
91:
5838-5842
9.
Iversen, P. O.,
L. B. To, and
A. F. Lopez.
1996.
Apoptosis of hemopoietic cells by the human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor mutant E21R.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
93:
2785-2789
10. Hansel, T. T., I. J. M. De Vries, T. Iff, S. Rihs, M. Wandzilak, S. Betz, K. Blaser, and C. Walker. 1991. An improved immunomagnetic procedure for the isolation of highly purified human blood eosinophils. J. Immunol. Methods 145: 105-110 [Medline].
11.
Gong, J. H.,
M. Uguccioni,
D. Dewald,
M. Baggiolini, and
I. Clark-Lewis.
1996.
RANTES and MCP-3 antagonists bind multiple chemo-kine receptors.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:
10521-10527
12. White, S. R., G. V. Kulp, S. M. Spaethe, E. Van Alstyne, and A. R. Leff. 1991. A kinetic assay for eosinophil peroxidase activity in eosinophils and eosinophil conditioned media. J. Immunol. Methods 144: 257-263 [Medline].
13. Winqvist, I., T. Olofsson, and I. Olsson. 1984. Mechanisms for eosinophil degranulation: release of the eosinophilic cationic protein. Immunology 51: 1-7 [Medline].
14. Kita, H., D. A. Weller, R. Abu-Ghazaleh, C. J. Sanderson, and G. J. Gleich. 1992. Release of granule proteins from eosinophils cultured with IL-5. J. Immunol. 149: 629-635 [Abstract].
15. Kita, H., M. Kato, G. J. Gleich, and R. T. Abraham. 1994. Tyrosine phosphorylation and inositol phosphate production are early events in human eosinophil activation stimulated by immobilised secretory IgA and IgC. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 94: 1272-1281 [Medline].
16. Her, E., J. Frazer, K. F. Austen, and W. F. Owen Jr.. 1991. Eosinophil hematopoietins antagonize the programmed cell death of eosinophils. J. Clin. Invest. 88: 1982-1987 .
17.
Boyce, J. A.,
D. Friend,
M. F. Gurish,
K. F. Austen, and
W. F. Owen.
1996.
Constitutive production of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by hypodense mononuclear eosinophils developed
in vitro from hybrid eosinophil/basophil granulocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
93:
2436-2442
18.
Moqbel, R.,
Q. Hamid,
S. Ying,
J. Barkans,
A. Hartnell,
A. Tsicopoulos,
A. J. Wardlaw, and
A. B. Kay.
1991.
Expression of mRNA and immunoreactivity for the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in activated human eosinophils.
J. Exp. Med.
174:
749-752
19.
Yousefi, S.,
D. C. Hoessli,
K. Blaser,
G. B. Mills, and
H.-U. Simon.
1996.
Requirement of Lyn and Syk tyrosine kinases for the prevention of
apoptosis by cytokines in human eosinophils.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
1407-1414
20.
Daugherty, B. L.,
S. J. Siciliano,
J. A. DeMartino,
L. Malkowitz,
A. Sorotina, and
M. S. Springer.
1996.
Cloning, expression, and characterization of the human eosinophil eotaxin receptor.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
2349-2354
21.
Ponath, P. D.,
S. Qin,
T. W. Post,
J. Wang,
L. Wu,
N. P. Gerard,
W. Newman,
C. Gerard, and
C. R. Mackay.
1996.
Molecular cloning and characterization of a human eotaxin receptor expressed selectively on
eosinophils.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
2437-2448
22. Xing, Z., Y. Ohkawara, M. Jordana, F. L. Graham, and J. Gauldie. 1996. Transfer of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene to rat lung induces eosinophilia, monocytosis, and fibrotic reactions. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 1102-1110 [Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Farahi, A. S. Cowburn, P. D. Upton, J. Deighton, A. Sobolewski, E. Gherardi, N. W. Morrell, and E. R. Chilvers Eotaxin-1/CC Chemokine Ligand 11: A Novel Eosinophil Survival Factor Secreted by Human Pulmonary Artery Endothelial Cells J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 1264 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Stamatiou, C.-C. Chan, G. Monneret, D. Ethier, J. Rokach, and W. S. Powell 5-Oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic Acid Stimulates the Release of the Eosinophil Survival Factor Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor from Monocytes J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28159 - 28164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Jakupovic, V. L. Grandage, D. C. Linch, and A. Khwaja Lack of effect of the human GM-CSF analog E21R on the survival of primary human acute myeloid leukemia cells Blood, April 15, 2004; 103(8): 3230 - 3232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoontrakoon, H. W. Chu, S. J. Gardai, S. E. Wenzel, P. McDonald, V. A. Fadok, P. M. Henson, and D. L. Bratton Interleukin-15 Inhibits Spontaneous Apoptosis in Human Eosinophils via Autocrine Production of Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor and Nuclear Factor-kappa B Activation Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2002; 26(4): 404 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stankova, S. Turcotte, J. Harris, and M. Rola-Pleszczynski Modulation of Leukotriene B4 Receptor-1 Expression by Dexamethasone: Potential Mechanism for Enhanced Neutrophil Survival J. Immunol., April 1, 2002; 168(7): 3570 - 3576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. von Wasielewski, S. Seth, J. Franklin, R. Fischer, K. Hubner, M. L. Hansmann, V. Diehl, and A. Georgii Tissue eosinophilia correlates strongly with poor prognosis in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's disease, allowing for known prognostic factors Blood, February 15, 2000; 95(4): 1207 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Goodman, P. Stricker, M. Velavicius, R. Fonseca, E. Kleinstein, R. Lavery, E. A. Deitch, C. J. Hauser, and H. H. Simms Role of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Its Receptor in the Genesis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Through an Effect on Neutrophil Apoptosis Arch Surg, October 1, 1999; 134(10): 1049 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |