help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on June 12, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-101OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 178, Number 4, August 2008, 419-424

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 15, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200801-101OCv1
178/4/419    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corsico, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Vigano, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corsico, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Vigano, M.

Submitted on January 15, 2008
Accepted on June 12, 2008

Long-term Outcome After Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Angelo G Corsico1, Andrea M D'Armini2, Isa Cerveri1*, Catherine Klersy3, Elena Ansaldo1, Rosanna Niniano1, Elena Gatto1, Cristian Monterosso2, Marco Morsolini2, Salvatore Nicolardi2, Corrado Tramontin2, Ernesto Pozzi1, and Mario Vigano2

1 Division of Respiratory Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, 2 Division of Cardiac Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, 3 Service of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: icerveri{at}smatteo.pv.it.

Rationale: There are few follow-up studies on long-term cardiopulmonary function after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), the operation of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Objectives: To prospectively evaluate long-term outcome of CTEPH patients treated with PEA. Methods: Between 1994 and 2006, 157 patients (mean age 55 years) were treated with PEA at Pavia University Hospital. The patients were evaluated before PEA and at 3 months (n=132) and 1 year (n=110), 2 years (n=86), 3 years (n=69), and 4 years (n=49) afterward by NYHA class, right heart hemodynamic, spirometry, carbon monoxide transfer factor (TLco), arterial blood gas, and treadmill incremental exercise test. Results: Cumulative survival was 84%. Within 3 months, 18 died in-hospital and 2 had lung transplantation; during long-term follow-up, 6 died, 1 had lung transplantation and 3 had a second PEA (2.5 events per 100 person year). NYHA class III-IV was the most important predictor of late death, lung transplant or PEA redo (HR 3.94). Extraordinary improvement in NYHA class, hemodynamic, and PaO2 were achieved in the first 3 months (p<0.001) and persisted during followup; exercise tolerance progressively increased over time (p<0.001). At 4 years, although 74% of the patients were in NYHA class I and none was in class IV, 24% had PVR >500 dyne.s/cm5 or PaO2<60 mmHg; they were significantly older and were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV 3 months after surgery than the others. Conclusions: After PEA, long-term survival and cardiopulmonary function recovery is excellent in most patients.


Key words: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; surgery; survival; lung function; hemodynamic.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art 2009