Submitted on January 14, 2008
Accepted on May 8, 2008
Intersession Variability in Single-Breath Diffusing Capacity in Diabetics Without Overt Lung Disease
Michael B Drummond1*, Pamela F Schwartz2, William T Duggan2, John G Teeter2, Richard J Riese2, Richard C Ahrens3, Robert O Crapo4, Richard D England2, Neil R MacIntyre5, Robert L Jensen4, and Robert A Wise1
1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA,
2 Pfizer Global Research and Development, New London, CT, USA,
3 University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA,
4 Pulmonary Division, University of Utah and LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA,
5 Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mdrummo3{at}jhmi.edu.
Rationale: American Thoracic Society guidelines state that a
10% intersession change in diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO) should be considered clinically significant. However, little is known about the short-term intersession variability in DLCO in untrained subjects or how variability is affected by rigorous external quality control.
Obejctives: To characterize the intersession variability of DLCO and the effect of different quality control methods in untrained individuals without significant lung disease.
Methods: Data were pooled from the comparator arms of 14 pre-registration trials of inhaled insulin that included non-smoking diabetic patients without significant lung disease. 699 participants performed repeated DLCO measurements using a highly standardized technique. 948 participants performed repeated measurements using routine clinical testing.
Measurements and Main Results: The mean intersession absolute change in DLCO using the highly standardized method was 1.45 mL/min/mm Hg (5.64%) compared to 2.49 mL/min/mm Hg (9.52% ) in the routine testing group (p<0.0001 for both absolute and percent difference). The variability in absolute intersession change in DLCOincreased with increasing baseline DLCOvalues, whereas the absolute percent intersession change was stable across baseline values. Depending upon the method, 15.5-35.5% of participants had an intersession change of
10%. A
20% threshold would reduce this percentage of patients to 1-10%.
Conclusions: Intersession variability in DLCO measurement is dependent upon the method of testing used and baseline DLCO. Using a more liberal threshold to define meaningful intersession change may reduce the misclassification of normal variation as abnormal change.
Key words: respiratory function testing, diffusing capacity, intersession variability, inhaled human insulin, methodology