help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on March 20, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200709-1424OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 177, Number 11, June 2008, 1215-1222

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200709-1424OCv1
177/11/1215    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Checkley, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Checkley, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B. T.

Submitted on September 25, 2007
Accepted on March 20, 2008

Effects of a Clinical Trial on Mechanical Ventilation Practices in Patients with Acute Lung Injury

William Checkley1*, Roy Brower1, Anna Korpak2, and B. Taylor Thompson2

1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2 Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wcheckl1{at}jhmi.edu.

Rationale: In a clinical trial by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSNet), mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 6 ml/kg decreased mortality from acute lung injury. However, interpretations of these results generated controversy and it was unclear if this trial would change usual care practices. Objectives: First, to determine if clinical practices at ARDSNet hospitals changed after the tidal volume trial. Second, to determine if tidal volume (VT) and plateau pressure (Pplat) within 48 hours before randomization affected hospital mortality in patients subsequently managed with 6 ml/kg PBW (predicted body weight). Methods: We used pre-enrollment data from 2,451 patients enrolled in six trials (1996-2005) to describe changes in VT over time. We used logistic regression to determine if pre-enrollment VT or Pplat affected mortality. Results: Median pre-enrollment VT decreased from 10.3 ml/kg PBW (range 4.3-17.1) during the tidal volume trial (1996-1999) to 7.3 ml/kg PBW (range 3.9-16.2) after its completion (p-value<0.001). Pre-enrollment VT was not associated with mortality (pvalue= 0.566). The odds of death increased multiplicatively with each cm H2O of preenrollment Pplat (p-value<0.001), e.g., the odds of death was 1.37 times greater when pre-enrollment Pplat increased by 10 cm H2O. Conclusions: Physicians used lower tidal volumes after publication of the tidal volume trial. Pre-enrollment plateau pressure was strongly associated with mortality, and may reflect disease severity independent of tidal volume. Plateau pressure measured early in the course of acute lung injury, after accounting for tidal volume, is a respiratory systemspecific value with strong prognostic significance.


Key words: Acute lung injury, mechanical ventilation, clinician practices.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society