help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on November 12, 2009, doi:10.1164/rccm.200905-0787OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200905-0787OCv1
181/6/578    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caironi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gattinoni, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caironi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gattinoni, L.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 181. pp. 578-586, (2010)
© 2010 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200905-0787OC


Original Article

Lung Opening and Closing during Ventilation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Pietro Caironi1,2, Massimo Cressoni1, Davide Chiumello2, Marco Ranieri3, Michael Quintel4, Sebastiano G. Russo4, Rodrigo Cornejo5, Guillermo Bugedo5, Eleonora Carlesso1, Riccarda Russo2, Luisa Caspani2 and Luciano Gattinoni1,2

1 Dipartimento di Anestesiologia, Terapia Intensiva, e Scienze Dermatologiche, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico–Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli, Regina Elena di Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 2 Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione e Terapia del Dolore, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico–Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli, Regina Elena di Milano, Milan, and 3 Dipartimento di Anestesia, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista-Molinette, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy; 4 Anaesthesiologie II, Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitatsklinikum Göttingen, Göttigen, Germany; and 5 Departementos de Anestesiologia y Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Luciano Gattinoni, M.D., Ph.D., Dipartimento di Anestesiologia, Terapia Intensiva, e Scienze Dermatologiche, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli, Regina Elena di Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy. E-mail: gattinon{at}policlinico.mi.it

Rationale: The effects of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strictly depend on lung recruitability, which varies widely during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Unfortunately, increasing PEEP may lead to opposing effects on two main factors potentially worsening the lung injury, that is, alveolar strain and intratidal opening and closing, being detrimental (increasing the former) or beneficial (decreasing the latter).

Objectives: To investigate how lung recruitability influences alveolar strain and intratidal opening and closing after the application of high PEEP.

Methods: We analyzed data from a database of 68 patients with acute lung injury or ARDS who underwent whole-lung computed tomography at 5, 15, and 45 cm H2O airway pressure.

Measurements and Main Results: End-inspiratory nonaerated lung tissue was estimated from computed tomography pressure–volume curves. Alveolar strain and opening and closing lung tissue were computed at 5 and 15 cm H2O PEEP. In patients with a higher percentage of potentially recruitable lung, the increase in PEEP markedly reduced opening and closing lung tissue (P < 0.001), whereas no differences were observed in patients with a lower percentage of potentially recruitable lung. In contrast, alveolar strain similarly increased in the two groups (P = 0.89). Opening and closing lung tissue was distributed mainly in the dependent and hilar lung regions, and it appeared to be an independent risk factor for death (odds ratio, 1.10 for each 10-g increase).

Conclusions: In ARDS, especially in patients with higher lung recruitability, the beneficial impact of reducing intratidal alveolar opening and closing by increasing PEEP prevails over the effects of increasing alveolar strain.

Key Words: acute respiratory distress syndrome • acute lung injury • ventilator-induced lung injury • mechanical ventilation


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
The response to high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) depends on lung recruitability, which varies among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Its application appears to be appropriate only in patients with a large amount of potentially recruitable lung. Unfortunately, the increase in PEEP may lead to opposing effects on the two major determinants of the development of ventilator-induced lung injury, that is, alveolar strain and intratidal lung opening and closing.

What This Study Adds to the Field
In patients with greater lung recruitability, the beneficial impact of reducing the amount of opening and closing lung tissue by increasing PEEP appears to prevail over the potentially harmful effects of increasing alveolar strain.

 

Related articles in AJRCCM:

New Goals for Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Paradigm Shift or the End of an Area of Uncertainty?
Laurent Brochard
AJRCCM 2010 181: 528-530. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2010 American Thoracic Society