help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on November 12, 2009, doi:10.1164/rccm.200906-0970OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200906-0970OCv1
181/2/168    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, O.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, O.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, G.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 181. pp. 168-173, (2010)
© 2010 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0970OC


Original Article

Prognostic Factors for Pulmonary Embolism

The PREP Study, A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Olivier Sanchez1,*, Ludovic Trinquart2,*, Vincent Caille3, Francis Couturaud4, Gérard Pacouret5, Nicolas Meneveau6, Franck Verschuren7, Pierre-Marie Roy8, Florence Parent9, Marc Righini10, Arnaud Perrier10, Christine Lorut11, Bernard Tardy12, Marie-Odile Benoit13, Gilles Chatellier2 and Guy Meyer1

1 Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs, and 2 Unité de Recherche Clinique, INSERM CIE 4, Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France; 3 Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Service de Réanimation médicale, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne, France; 4 Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Brest, EA3878, IFR148, and Departement de Médecine Interne et de Pneumologie, CHU de La Cavale Blanche, Brest, France; 5 Hôpital Trousseau, Service de Cardiologie A, CHRU de Tours, France; 6 CHU Jean Minjoz, Service de Cardiologie, Besançon; France 7 Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Acute Medicine Department, Accidents and Emergency Unit, Brussels, Belgium; 8 CHU d'Angers, Service d'accueil des urgences, Angers, France; 9 Hôpital Antoine Béclère, service de pneumologie, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clamart, France; 10 Geneva University Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; 11 Hôtel Dieu de Paris, service de pneumologie, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; 12 CHU St-Etienne Bellevue, service des urgences et réanimation médicale, St-Etienne, France; 13 Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, service de biochimie, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Olivier Sanchez, M.D., Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc 75015 Paris, France. E-mail: olivier.sanchez{at}egp.aphp.fr

Rationale: The short-term prognosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) depends on hemodynamic status and underlying disease. The prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction and injury is less well established.

Objectives: To evaluate prognostic factors of PE in a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Methods: Echocardiography, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal–proBNP and cardiac troponin I measurements were done on admission of 570 consecutive patients with an acute PE. A predictive model was based on independent predictors of 30-day adverse events defined as death, secondary cardiogenic shock, or recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Measurements and Main Results: At 30 days, 42 patients (7.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5–9.8%) had adverse events. On multivariate analysis, altered mental state (odds ratio [OR] 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0–23.3), shock on admission (OR 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1–7.5), cancer (OR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2–6.9), BNP (OR 1.3 for an increase of 250 ng/L; 95% CI, 1.1–1.6) and right to left ventricle diameter ratio (OR 1.2 for an increase of 0.1; 95% CI, 1.1–1.4) were associated with 30-days of adverse events. The predictive performance of the model was good (area under receiver operating characteristics curve 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78–0.90]), making it possible to develop a bedside prognostic score.

Conclusions: BNP and echocardiography may be useful determinants of the short-term outcome for patients with PE, together with clinical findings. Patients with PE can be stratified according to the initial risk of adverse outcome, using a simple score based on clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical variables.

Key Words: echocardiography • natriuretic peptides • prognosis • pulmonary embolism


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Recent guidelines suggest that initial risk stratification of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) should be based on the presence of shock and hypotension. Further stratification based on imaging or biochemical markers of right ventricular dysfunction or injury has been suggested, but current evidence is insufficient to make definitive recommendations on this point.

What This Study Adds to the Field
BNP and echocardiography may be useful determinants of the short-term outcome for patients with PE, together with clinical findings. PE patients may be stratified according to the initial risk of adverse outcome, using a simple score based on clinical, echocardiographic and biochemical variables.

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
J. R. Dalzell
Biomarkers in pulmonary embolism
QJM, February 5, 2010; (2010) hcq005v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2010 American Thoracic Society
  Membership Renewal