Published ahead of print on October 29, 2009, doi:10.1164/rccm.200812-1820OC
© 2010 American Thoracic Society doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1820OC
Selected Medical Errors in the Intensive Care UnitResults of the IATROREF Study: Parts I and II1 Medical–Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris; 2 INSERM U823 (Outcome of Cancers and Critical Illness), Albert Bonniot Institute, La Tronche; 3 Department of Biostatistics, OUTCOMEREA, La Tronche; 4 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Albert Michallon Teaching Hospital, Grenoble; 5 Medical–Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Pays d'Aix Hospital, Aix en Provence; 6 Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesiology, Pain, and Emergency Department, Caremeau Teaching Hospital Network, Nîmes; 7 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Montpied Hospital, Clermont Ferrand; 8 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cochin Teaching Hospital, Paris; 9 Medical–Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Pasteur Hospital, Chartres; 10 Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris; 11 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Bichat Teaching Hospital, Paris; 12 Medical–Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Mignot Hospital, Le Chesnay; 13 Medical Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Les Oudaries Hospital, La Roche Sur Yon; 14 Ile de France Regional Hospitalization Agency, Paris; 15 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris; 16 Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris; and 17 Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, M.D., Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014 Paris, France. E-mail: mgarrouste{at}outcomerea.org, mgarrouste{at}hpsj.fr Rationale: Although intensive care units (ICUs) were created for patients with life-threatening illnesses, the ICU environment generates a high risk of iatrogenic events. Identifying medical errors (MEs) that serve as indicators for iatrogenic risk is crucial for purposes of reporting and prevention. Objectives: We describe the selection of indicator MEs, the incidence of such MEs, and their relationship with mortality. Methods: We selected indicator MEs using Delphi techniques. An observational prospective multicenter cohort study of these MEs was conducted from March 27 to April 3, 2006, in 70 ICUs; 16 (23%) centers were audited. Harm from MEs was collected using specific scales. Measurements and Main Results: Fourteen types of MEs were selected as indicators; 1,192 MEs were reported for 1,369 patients, and 367 (26.8%) patients experienced at least 1 ME (2.1/1,000 patient-days). The most common MEs were insulin administration errors (185.9/1,000 d of insulin treatment). Of the 1,192 medical errors, 183 (15.4%) in 128 (9.3%) patients were adverse events that were followed by one or more clinical consequences (n = 163) or that required one or more procedures or treatments (n = 58). By multivariable analysis, having two or more adverse events was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.30–7.36; P = 0.039). Conclusions: The impact of medical errors on mortality indicates an urgent need to develop prevention programs. We have planned a study to assess a program based on our results.
Key Words: adverse event IATROREF intensive care unit medical error quality indicator
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||