help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on August 20, 2009, doi:10.1164/rccm.200812-1912OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200812-1912OCv1
180/9/861    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrer, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrer, R.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 180. pp. 861-866, (2009)
© 2009 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1912OC


Original Article

Effectiveness of Treatments for Severe Sepsis

A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Ricard Ferrer1, Antonio Artigas1, David Suarez2, Eduardo Palencia3, Mitchell M. Levy4, Angel Arenzana5, Xose Luis Pérez6, Josep-Maria Sirvent7 for the Edusepsis Study Group*

1 Critical Care Center, Hospital de Sabadell, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, and 2 Epidemiology and Assessment Unit, Instituto Universitario Fundación Parc Taulí, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain; 3 Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; 4 Medical ICU, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island; 5 Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Virgen de la Macarena, Sevilla; 6 Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat; and 7 Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Ricard Ferrer, M.D., Critical Care Center, Hospital de Sabadell, Parc Taulí, 1 08208 Sabadell, Spain. E-mail: rferrer{at}tauli.cat

Rationale: Several Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommendations are reevaluated.

Objectives: To analyze the effectiveness of treatments recommended in the sepsis guidelines.

Methods: In a prospective observational study, we studied all adult patients with severe sepsis from 77 intensive care units. We recorded compliance with four therapeutic goals (central venous pressure 8 mm Hg or greater for persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation and/or lactate greater than 36 mg/dl, central venous oxygen saturation 70% or greater for persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation and/or lactate greater than 36 mg/dl, blood glucose greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal but less than 150 mg/dl, and inspiratory plateau pressure less than 30 cm H2O for mechanically ventilated patients) and four treatments (early broad-spectrum antibiotics, fluid challenge in the event of hypotension and/or lactate greater than 36 mg/dl, low-dose steroids for septic shock, drotrecogin alfa [activated] for multiorgan failure). The primary outcome measure was hospital mortality. The effectiveness of each treatment was estimated using propensity scores.

Measurements and Main Results: Of 2,796 patients, 41.6% died before hospital discharge. Treatments associated with lower hospital mortality were early broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment (treatment within 1 hour vs. no treatment within first 6 hours of diagnosis; odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–0.90; P = 0.008) and drotrecogin alfa (activated) (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.84; P = 0.004). Fluid challenge and low-dose steroids showed no benefits.

Conclusions: In severe sepsis, early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics in all patients and administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the most severe patients reduce mortality.

Key Words: intensive care unit • guidelines • mortality • propensity scores


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Early appropriate antibiotic therapy, early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroids, recombinant human-activated protein C, tight glucose control, and lung protective strategies have been associated with survival benefits in patients with severe sepsis.

What This Study Adds to the Field
In a large cohort of ICU patients with severe sepsis, we found that two of the four treatments recommended in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign care bundles, i.e., early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated), were independently associated with lower hospital mortality after adjusting for several independent clinical predictors of death.

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Infect. DiseasesHome page
Managing Sepsis and Septic Shock
Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, November 25, 2009; 2009(1125): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2009 American Thoracic Society
  Portfolio of grants