help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on September 5, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200802-335OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200802-335OCv1
178/11/1156    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fan, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, N. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fan, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, N. D.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 178. pp. 1156-1163, (2008)
© 2008 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200802-335OC


Original Article

Recruitment Maneuvers for Acute Lung Injury

A Systematic Review

Eddy Fan1,2, M. Elizabeth Wilcox1, Roy G. Brower2, Thomas E. Stewart1, Sangeeta Mehta1, Stephen E. Lapinsky1, Maureen O. Meade3 and Niall D. Ferguson1

1 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and 3 Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Niall D. Ferguson, M.D., M.Sc., Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, 2MCL-411M Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8. E-mail: n.ferguson{at}utoronto.ca

Rationale: There are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of recruitment maneuvers (RMs) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI).

Objectives: To summarize the physiologic effects and adverse events in adult patients with ALI receiving RMs.

Methods: Systematic review of case series, observational studies, and randomized clinical trials with pooling of study-level data.

Measurements and Main Results: Forty studies (1,185 patients) met inclusion criteria. Oxygenation (31 studies; 636 patients) was significantly increased after an RM (PaO2: 106 versus 193 mm Hg, P = 0.001; and PaO2/FIO2 ratio: 139 versus 251 mm Hg, P < 0.001). There were no persistent, clinically significant changes in hemodynamic parameters after an RM. Ventilatory parameters (32 studies; 548 patients) were not significantly altered by an RM, except for higher PEEP post-RM (11 versus 16 cm H2O; P = 0.02). Hypotension (12%) and desaturation (9%) were the most common adverse events (31 studies; 985 patients). Serious adverse events (e.g., barotrauma [1%] and arrhythmias [1%]) were infrequent. Only 10 (1%) patients had their RMs terminated prematurely due to adverse events.

Conclusions: Adult patients with ALI receiving RMs experienced a significant increase in oxygenation, with few serious adverse events. Transient hypotension and desaturation during RMs is common but is self-limited without serious short-term sequelae. Given the uncertain benefit of transient oxygenation improvements in patients with ALI and the lack of information on their influence on clinical outcomes, the routine use of RMs cannot be recommended or discouraged at this time. RMs should be considered for use on an individualized basis in patients with ALI who have life-threatening hypoxemia.

Key Words: artificial respiration • adult respiratory distress syndrome • respiratory physiology • systematic review


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Conflicting data exist regarding the safety and efficacy of recruitment maneuvers in patients with acute lung injury. Recruitment maneuvers lead to a significant increase in oxygenation, with few serious adverse events.

What this Study Adds to the Field
Given the uncertain benefit of transient oxygenation improvements in patients with ALI and the lack of information on their influence on clinical outcomes, the routine use of RMs cannot be recommended or discouraged at this time. RMs should be considered for use on an individualized basis in patients with ALI who have life-threatening hypoxemia.

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Grasso, T. Stripoli, M. Sacchi, P. Trerotoli, F. Staffieri, D. Franchini, V. De Monte, V. Valentini, P. Pugliese, A. Crovace, et al.
Inhomogeneity of Lung Parenchyma during the Open Lung Strategy: A Computed Tomography Scan Study
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2009; 180(5): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Clinical Skills Tests