Published ahead of print on January 17, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-477OC
© 2008 American Thoracic Society doi: 10.1164/rccm.200703-477OC
Can Ventilation–Feedback Training Augment Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?1 Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois; 2 College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; 3 Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois; and 4 VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Eileen G. Collins, Ph.D. Research and Development (151), Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL 60141. E-mail: ecollins{at}uic.edu Rationale: Exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation contributes to decreased exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unknown whether respiratory retraining (ventilation–feedback [VF] training) can affect exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation and increase exercise tolerance. Objectives: To determine whether patients with COPD would achieve longer exercise duration if randomized to a combination of exercise training plus VF training than either form of training on its own. Methods: A total of 64 patients randomized to 1 of 3 groups: VF plus exercise (n = 22), exercise alone (n = 20), and VF alone (n = 22).
Measurements and Main Results: Exercise duration before and after 36 training sessions and exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation and respiratory pattern before and after training were measured. In the 49 patients who completed training, duration of constant work-rate exercise was 40.0 (± 20.4) minutes (mean ± SD) with VF plus exercise, 31.5 (± 17.3) minutes with exercise alone, and 16.1 (± 19.3) minutes with VF alone. Exercise duration was longer in VF plus exercise than in VF alone (P < 0.0001), but did not reach predetermined statistical significance when VF plus exercise was compared with exercise alone (P = 0.022) (because of multiple comparisons, P Conclusions: The combination of VF plus exercise training decreases exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation and increases exercise duration more than VF alone. An additive effect to exercise training from VF was not demonstrated by predetermined statistical criteria. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00037973).
Key Words: pulmonary disease • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease • breathing exercises • exercise
Related articles in AJRCCM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0.0167 was used for statistical significance). After training, exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation, measured at isotime, in VF plus exercise was less than in exercise alone (P = 0.014 for between-group changes) and less than in VF alone (P = 0.019 for between-group changes). After training, expiratory time was longer in VF plus exercise training (P < 0.001), and it was not significantly changed in the other two groups. 
