help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on April 26, 2007, doi:10.1164/rccm.200609-1317OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200609-1317OCv1
176/2/129    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. G.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 176. pp. 129-137, (2007)
© 2007 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1317OC


Original Article

Airway Distensibility in Adults with Asthma and Healthy Adults, Measured by Forced Oscillation Technique

Nathan J. Brown1,2,3, Cheryl M. Salome1,2,3, Norbert Berend1,2,3,4, C. William Thorpe3,5 and Gregory G. King1,2,3,4

1 Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Camperdown, Australia; 2 Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 3 Cooperative Research Centre for Asthma, Sydney, Australia; 4 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, Australia; and 5 Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Nathan Brown, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Box M77, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050 Australia. E-mail: njb{at}woolcock.org.au

Rationale: Reduced airway distensibility in subjects with asthma compared with control subjects may be related to differences in lung elastic recoil and bronchomotor tone.

Objectives: To examine the contribution of lung elastic recoil and bronchomotor tone to airway distensibility.

Methods: We compared airway distensibility in 18 subjects with asthma with 19 control subjects before and after bronchodilator administration and, in a subgroup of 7 subjects with asthma and 8 control subjects, correlated distensibility with pressure–volume parameters.

Measurements and Main Results: Distensibility was measured, using the forced oscillation technique, as the linear slope of conductance versus volume between total lung capacity (TLC) and 75% TLC and between 75% TLC and FRC. Transpulmonary pressure was recorded concurrently with distensibility, using an esophageal balloon. Pressure–conductance data were described using linear regressions and pressure–volume data were described using exponential equations. Subjects with asthma had lower baseline FEV1 (p = 0.0003) and conductance (p = 0.002) than did control subjects. Distensibility above 75% TLC was less in subjects with asthma than in control subjects (p < 0.0001), but there was no difference below 75% TLC. Bronchodilator administration did not alter distensibility despite increases in FEV1 (p = 0.0002) and conductance (p < 0.0001) in subjects with asthma, and conductance (p = 0.0004) in control subjects. After bronchodilator administration, subjects with asthma had reduced lung elastic recoil compared with control subjects (p = 0.03) and a reduced pressure–conductance slope (p = 0.01), but there were no correlations between pressure–volume characteristics and airway distensibility.

Conclusions: Airway distensibility measured by forced oscillation technique is reduced in subjects with asthma compared with subjects without asthma, is not related to lung elastic recoil, and is unchanged by bronchodilator administration. Airway wall remodeling remains the most likely cause of reduced airway distensibility in asthma.

Key Words: respiratory mechanics • oscillometry • bronchi


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Airway distensibility is reduced in subjects with asthma compared to control subjects but it is not known if this is due to differences in either lung elastic recoil or bronchomotor tone.

What This Study Adds to the Field
Bronchomotor tone has little effect on airway distensibility measured by forced oscillation technique, and airway distensibility does not correlate with pulmonary pressure–volume characteristics.

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
M. O'Reilly, S. B. Hooper, B. J. Allison, S. J. Flecknoe, K. Snibson, R. Harding, and F. Sozo
Persistent bronchiolar remodeling following brief ventilation of the very immature ovine lung
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): L992 - L1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
D. G. Chapman, N. Berend, G. G. King, and C. M. Salome
Increased airway closure is a determinant of airway hyperresponsiveness
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2008; 32(6): 1563 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Lahzami and G. G. King
Targeting small airways in asthma: the new challenge of inhaled corticosteroid treatment
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1145 - 1147.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. C. Moore
Update in Asthma 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2008; 177(10): 1068 - 1073.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society