help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Published ahead of print on March 22, 2007, doi:10.1164/rccm.200609-1397CP
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200609-1397CPv1
175/11/1104    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luce, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luce, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. B.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 175. pp. 1104-1108, (2007)
© 2007 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1397CP

Critical Care Perspective

The Pressure to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Therapy from Critically Ill Patients in the United States

John M. Luce1,2 and Douglas B. White2

1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, and 2 University of California, San Francisco, California

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to John M. Luce, M.D., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Room 5 K1, San Francisco, CA 94110. E-mail: john.luce{at}sfdph.org

ABSTRACT

Physicians and nurses sometimes exert pressure on the families of critically ill patients to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from them. This pressure may stem from prognostic, professional, social, and economic factors. Although the pressure to limit life support may be appropriate in some circumstances, in others it is not justified. The pressure also may damage communications and cause resentment. If communications cannot be improved, and if the pressure cannot be relieved, a due process approach to conflict resolution that involves other parties may be required.

Key Words: end-of-life care • withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy • ICU rationing • triage




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
H. Starks and J. R. Curtis
Is Withholding Life Support Associated With a Premature Death?: If So, What Does This Mean for ICU Practice?
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6): 1298 - 1300.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
H. Shanawani, M. D. Wenrich, M. R. Tonelli, and J. R. Curtis
Meeting Physicians' Responsibilities in Providing End-of-Life Care
Chest, March 1, 2008; 133(3): 775 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Singh
Challenges to the Withdrawal of Care in Critically Ill Patients in India
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2008; 177(1): 123 - 124.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. Dandapantula, V. Reddy, and J. R. Spears
Families and the Decision to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Therapy from the Critically Ill: Are Pressure Tactics Ever Justified?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2008; 177(1): 124 - 124.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch GeneralHome page
Palliative Care Consultation and Length of Stay in the ICU
Journal Watch (General), June 14, 2007; 2007(614): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society