help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on August 24, 2006, doi:10.1164/rccm.200510-1606OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200510-1606OCv1
174/10/1077    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buist, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hayward, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buist, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hayward, A. D.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 174. pp. 1077-1087, (2006)
© 2006 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200510-1606OC


Original Article

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Peak Flow versus Symptom Monitoring in Older Adults with Asthma

A. Sonia Buist, William M. Vollmer, Sandra R. Wilson, E. Ann Frazier and Arthur D. Hayward

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland; Center for Health Research, and Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon; and Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to A. Sonia Buist, M.D., Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code UHN 67, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239. E-mail: buists{at}ohsu.edu

Objective: To determine whether peak flow monitoring has value above and beyond symptom monitoring when used as part of an asthma management plan.

Methods: From a large managed-care organization, 296 adults, aged 50–92 yr, were recruited and randomly assigned in equal numbers to either use of symptoms or peak flow rate (twice daily or "as needed") for asthma monitoring, and monitored every 6 mo for 2 yr. Interventions were delivered in four 90-min small-group classes and included a personalized action plan and coaching in proper use of asthma inhalers.

Results: We found no significant differences between peak flow rate and symptom monitoring, or between twice-daily and as-needed peak flow monitoring in the primary or secondary study outcomes: health care utilization (acute, nonacute, or total asthma visits), Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores, and lung function. AQLQ scores and prebronchodilator FEV1 increased significantly for both groups between baseline and 6 mo (AQLQ: mean, 0.4 units; 95% confidence interval, 0.3, 0.5; p < 0.0001; FEV1% predicted: mean, 4%). Inhaler technique improved substantially in both groups.

Conclusions: Peak flow monitoring has no advantage over symptom monitoring as an asthma management strategy for older adults with moderate–severe asthma when used in a comprehensive asthma management program. Improved outcomes in both groups suggest that understanding proper medication use, regular monitoring of asthma status, and understanding how to respond to changes are of primary importance.

Key Words: health care utilization • lung function • quality of life • self-management


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Although peak flow monitoring is recommended in treatment guidelines, there have been no studies to determine whether peak flow monitoring has value above and beyond symptom monitoring when used as part of an asthma management plan for older adults.

What This Study Adds to the Field
Peak flow monitoring had no advantage over symptom monitoring as an asthma management strategy for older adults with moderate-to-severe asthma.

 

Related articles in AJRCCM:

Peak Expiratory Flow Monitoring in Older Patients with Asthma: An Aid to Management?
Dirkje S. Postma and Marike H. M. Boezen
AJRCCM 2006 174: 1065-1066. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
J. I Peters
Addition of peak flow monitoring to symptom monitoring did not improve healthcare visits, quality of life, or lung function in older adults with moderate-to-severe asthma
Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 49 - 49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
L. Cicutto
Addition of peak flow monitoring to symptom monitoring did not improve healthcare visits, quality of life, or lung function in older adults with moderate-to-severe asthma
Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2007; 10(2): 52 - 52.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. C. Moore and S. P. Peters
Update in Asthma 2006
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2007; 175(7): 649 - 654.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Does Home Use of Peak Flow Meters Improve Asthma Management in Adults?
Journal Watch (General), December 12, 2006; 2006(1212): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. S. Postma and M. H. M. Boezen
Peak expiratory flow monitoring in older patients with asthma: an aid to management?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2006; 174(10): 1065 - 1066.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2006 American Thoracic Society
  CCM abstracts