This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Online Supplement All Versions of this Article: 200407-940OCv1 200407-940OCv2 171/9/1002    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grasso, S. Articles by Fiore, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grasso, S. Articles by Fiore, T.

Effects of High versus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Dipartimento dell'Emergenza e Trapianti d'Organo, Sezione di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Bari; and Azienda Sanitaria Locale Bari-4, Ospedale Di Venere, Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Bari, Italy

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to S. Grasso, M.D., Dipartimento dell'Emergenza e Trapianti d'Organo (DETO), Sezione di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Ospedale Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, Italy 70124. E-mail: grassos{at}libero.it

A recent study by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network compared the traditional lower end-expiratory pressure strategy with a higher end-expiratory pressure strategy in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with low tidal volumes. Clinical outcomes were similar whether lower or higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels were used. We applied both the lower (9 ± 2 cm H₂O) and higher (16 ± 1 cm H₂O) PEEP strategy in 19 patients. In nine recruiters, the higher end-expiratory pressure strategy resulted in significant alveolar recruitment (587 ± 158 ml), improvement in arterial oxygen partial pressure/inspired oxygen fraction ratio (from 150 ± 36 to 396 ± 138), and reduction in static lung elastance (from 23 ± 3 to 20 ± 2 cm H₂O/L). In 10 nonrecruiters, alveolar recruitment was minimal, oxygenation did not improve, and static lung elastance significantly increased (from 26 ± 5 to 28 ± 6 cm H₂O/L). The increase in oxygenation, the reduction in static lung elastance, and the shape of the volume–pressure curve during the lower PEEP strategy were independently associated with alveolar recruitment. In conclusion, the protocol proposed by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, lacking solid physiologic basis, frequently fails to induce alveolar recruitment and may increase the risk of alveolar overinflation.

Key Words: acute respiratory distress syndrome, human • positive-pressure respiration/methods • respiratory distress syndrome, adult/therapy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Talmor, T. Sarge, A. Malhotra, C. R. O'Donnell, R. Ritz, A. Lisbon, V. Novack, and S. H. Loring Mechanical Ventilation Guided by Esophageal Pressure in Acute Lung Injury N. Engl. J. Med., November 13, 2008; 359(20): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mercat, J.-C. M. Richard, B. Vielle, S. Jaber, D. Osman, J.-L. Diehl, J.-Y. Lefrant, G. Prat, J. Richecoeur, A. Nieszkowska, et al. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in Adults With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, February 13, 2008; 299(6): 646 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Grasso, T. Stripoli, M. De Michele, F. Bruno, M. Moschetta, G. Angelelli, I. Munno, V. Ruggiero, R. Anaclerio, A. Cafarelli, et al. ARDSnet Ventilatory Protocol and Alveolar Hyperinflation: Role of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2007; 176(8): 761 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Syring, C. M. Otto, R. E. Spivack, K. Markstaller, and J. E. Baumgardner Maintenance of end-expiratory recruitment with increased respiratory rate after saline-lavage lung injury J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2007; 102(1): 331 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Moss Clinical Year in Review III: Critical Care, Mechanical Ventilation, Sleep Medicine, and Lung Cancer Proceedings of the ATS, November 1, 2006; 3(8): 645 - 649. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Borges, V. N. Okamoto, G. F. J. Matos, M. P. R. Caramez, P. R. Arantes, F. Barros, C. E. Souza, J. A. Victorino, R. M. Kacmarek, C. S. V. Barbas, et al. Reversibility of Lung Collapse and Hypoxemia in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2006; 174(3): 268 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Gattinoni, P. Caironi, M. Cressoni, D. Chiumello, V. M. Ranieri, M. Quintel, S. Russo, N. Patroniti, R. Cornejo, and G. Bugedo Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med., April 27, 2006; 354(17): 1775 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Slutsky and L. D. Hudson PEEP or no PEEP--lung recruitment may be the solution. N. Engl. J. Med., April 27, 2006; 354(17): 1839 - 1841. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. B. Milbrandt, A. Ishizaka, and D. C. Angus Update in critical care 2005. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2006; 173(8): 833 - 841. [Full Text] [PDF]