help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukuoka, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ikegami, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukuoka, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ikegami, H.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 168. pp. 1115-1122, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society

Chemoreflex Drive and the Dynamics of Ventilation and Gas Exchange during Exercise at Hypoxia

Yoshiyuki Fukuoka, Masako Endo, Yasuharu Oishi and Haruo Ikegami

Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Physiology, Faculty of Environmental and Symbiotic Science, Prefectural University of Kumamoto; Laboratory of Muscle Physiology, Faculty of Education, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto; and Institute of Health and Sports Science, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Japan

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Yoshiyuki Fukuoka, Ph.D., Faculty of Environmental and Symbiotic Science, Prefectural University of Kumamoto, 3-1-100 Tsukide, Kumamoto 862–8502, Japan. E-mail: fukuoka{at}pu-kumamoto.ac.jp

We tested the hypothesis that the promotion of hypoxic ventilatory responsiveness (HVR) and/or hypercapnic ventilatory responsiveness (HCVR) mostly acting on the carotid body with a changing work rate can be attributed to faster hypoxic ventilatory dynamics at the onset of exercise. Eleven subjects performed a cycling exercise with two repetitions of 6 minutes while breathing at FIO2 = 12%. The tests began with unloaded pedaling, followed by three constant work rates of 40%, 60%, and 80% of the subject's ventilatory threshold at hypoxia. Reference data were obtained at the 80% ventilatory threshold work rate during normoxia. Using three inhaled 100% O2 breath tests, a comparison of hypoxia and normoxia revealed an augmentation of HVR in hypoxia, which then significantly increased proportionally with the increase in work rate. In contrast, HCVR using three inhaled 10% CO2 breath tests was unaffected by the difference in work rate at hypoxia but did exceed its level at normoxia. The decrease in the half-time of hypoxic ventilation became significant with an increase in work rates and was significantly lower than at normoxia. Using a multiregression equation, HVR was found to account for 63% of the variance of hypoxic ventilatory dynamics at the onset of exercise and HCVR for 9%. O2 uptake on-kinetics and off-kinetics under hypoxic conditions were significantly slower than under normoxic conditions, whereas they were not altered by the changing work rates at hypoxia. These results suggest that the faster hypoxic ventilatory dynamics at the onset of exercise can be mostly attributed to the augmentation of HVR with an increase in work rates rather than to HCVR. Otherwise, O2 uptake dynamics are affected by the lower O2, not by the changing work rates under hypoxic conditions.

Key Words: chemoreflex drive • ventilatory dynamics • hypoxia • hypercapnia • exercise




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
N. Fujii, Y. Honda, K. Hayashi, N. Kondo, S. Koga, and T. Nishiyasu
Effects of chemoreflexes on hyperthermic hyperventilation and cerebral blood velocity in resting heated humans
Exp Physiol, August 1, 2008; 93(8): 994 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 254 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Clinical Skills Tests