This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 200208-899OCv1 167/5/729    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haage, P. Articles by Bücker, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haage, P. Articles by Bücker, A.

Pulmonary Embolism

Comparison of Angiography with Spiral Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, and Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Aachen; and Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Patrick Haage, M.D., Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52057 Aachen, Germany. E-mail: haage{at}rad.rwth-aachen.de

In the last decade, spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography (MRA) have become a viable alternative to conventional angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. However, patients with dyspnea are often unable to hold their breath for a longer time and thus image degradation is frequently observed. Consequently, an imaging sequence that allows free breathing is desirable. The aim of this animal study was to compare contrast-enhanced spiral CT, MRA and a real-time MR sequence, the latter without breath-hold, with pulmonary angiography as reference gold standard. Nine pigs with artificially induced pulmonary embolism underwent this multimodality comparison. All images were independently evaluated for the presence of pulmonary emboli by two reviewers. Forty-three filling defects were detected by conventional angiography on lobar and segmental levels. Sensitivity of CT images was 72.1 and 69.8% for Readers 1 and 2, respectively, and sensitivity of MRA images was 79.1 and 81.4%. With real-time MR imaging, however, the detection rate was 97.7% for both readers. We conclude that, under experimental conditions, real-time MR imaging without the use of radiation or iodinated contrast material is comparable with angiography in the detection of pulmonary emboli.

Key Words: pulmonary embolism • angiography • spinal computed tomography • magnetic resonance imaging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kluge, W. Luboldt, and G. Bachmann Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W7 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kluge, C. Mueller, J. Strunk, U. Lange, and G. Bachmann Experience in 207 combined MRI examinations for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1686 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Spuentrup, M. Katoh, A. J. Wiethoff, E. C. Parsons Jr., R. M. Botnar, A. H. Mahnken, R. W. Gunther, and A. Buecker Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Emboli with a Fibrin-specific Contrast Agent Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2005; 172(4): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Kanne and T. A. Lalani Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12_suppl_1): I-15 - I-21. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. J. Tobin Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pollution, Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Transplantation, Pleural Disease, and Lung Cancer in AJRCCM 2003 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 301 - 313. [Full Text] [PDF]