This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Farré, R. Articles by Navajas, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Farré, R. Articles by Navajas, D.

Response of Automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices to Different Sleep Breathing Patterns

A Bench Study

Unitat de Biofísica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona; Servei de Pneumologia i Al lèrgia Respiratòria, Hospital Clinic Provincial; and Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Ramon Farré, Unitat de Biofisica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina Casanova, 143 E-08036, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: farre{at}medicina.ub.es

Evaluating the usefulness of automatic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in treating the sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) is not easy because the algorithms for automatic CPAP implemented in the devices available are not well known and are probably dependent on the device. In addition, at present it is not possible to test the behavior of automatic CPAP devices in response to well-defined breathing patterns. Our aim was to implement a bench test to characterize the responses of automatic CPAP devices by subjecting them to breathing patterns of patients with SAHS. To this end, a variety of typical breathing patterns (normal, apneas, hypopneas, flow limitation, snoring) previously recorded in patients with SAHS during sleep were reproduced by a breathing waveform generator. Five commercially available automatic CPAP devices were tested. The responses of the devices to apneas, hypopneas, flow limitation, and snoring were considerably different. In some devices, the response was modified by air leaks similar to the ones found in patients. Consequently, the effectiveness of automatic CPAP assessed in clinical tests performed by using particular devices has no general validity. Testing automatic CPAP devices in a bench study is a useful first step in evaluating the performance of this new type of device in adjusting nasal pressure for each patient.

Key Words: automatic CPAP devices • sleep apnea • hypopnea • flow limitation • self-regulation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Farre and D. Navajas Quality control: a necessary, but sometimes overlooked, tool for improving respiratory medicine Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2009; 33(4): 722 - 723. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pevernagie, J. F. Masa, J. C. Meurice, R. Farre, O. Marrone, and D. Rodenstein Treatment of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing with positive airway pressure systems Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2007; 16(106): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. K. Kakkar and R. B. Berry Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 1057 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Lofaso, G. Desmarais, K. Leroux, V. Zalc, R. Fodil, D. Isabey, and B. Louis Bench evaluation of flow limitation detection by automated continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 343 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rigau, J. M. Montserrat, H. Wohrle, D. Plattner, M. Schwaibold, D. Navajas, and R. Farre Bench model to simulate upper airway obstruction for analyzing automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 350 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Nolan, S. Ryan, T. M. O'Connor, and W. T. McNicholas Comparison of three auto-adjusting positive pressure devices in patients with sleep apnoea Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2006; 28(1): 159 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Masa, A. Jimenez, J. Duran, F. Capote, C. Monasterio, M. Mayos, J. Teran, L. Hernandez, F. Barbe, A. Maimo, et al. Alternative Methods of Titrating Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Large Multicenter Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2004; 170(11): 1218 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Abdenbi, B. Chambille, and P. Escourrou Bench testing of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure devices Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 649 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Pevernagie, P. M. Proot, K. B. Hertegonne, M. C. Neyens, K. P. Hoornaert, and R. A. Pauwels Efficacy of Flow- vs Impedance-Guided Autoadjustable Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Cross-over Trial Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Senn, T. Brack, F. Matthews, E. W. Russi, and K. E. Bloch Randomized Short-term Trial of Two AutoCPAP Devices versus Fixed Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for the Treatment of Sleep Apnea Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2003; 168(12): 1506 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Tobin Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, and Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2002 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 306 - 318. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Massie, N. McArdle, R. W. Hart, W. W. Schmidt-Nowara, A. Lankford, D. W. Hudgel, N. Gordon, and N. J. Douglas Comparison between Automatic and Fixed Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in the Home Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2003; 167(1): 20 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]