This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Online Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 200206-503OCv1 166/11/1430    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Upadya, A. Articles by Manthous, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Upadya, A. Articles by Manthous, C. A.

Patient, Physician, and Family Member Understanding of Living Wills

Pulmonary and Critical Care, Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport; and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to C.A. Manthous, M.D., Bridgeport Hospital, 267 Grant Street, Bridgeport, CT 06610. E-mail: pcmant{at}bpthosp.org

This study examines understanding of living wills by patients, family members, and physicians. Questionnaires were used to examine whether each cohort understood patients' living wills regarding endotracheal intubation and cardiopulmonary rescuscitation (CPR). Of 4,800 patients admitted during the study period, 206 reported having living wills, all of which precluded intubation and CPR for "terminal conditions." Of 140 admitted to the general hospital wards, 17 (12%) wanted their living wills to preclude intubation/mechanical ventilation and 12 (8.6%) did not want resuscitation under any circumstances. Seven of 120 (6%) physicians and 4 of 108 family members would not intubate or perform CPR even if there was a chance of recovery. Of 88 patients with complete data (including physicians and family members), 29 (33%) wanted their living wills to block intubation/mechanical ventilation only if they were deemed terminal and 46 (52%) wanted the living will to block intubation even if there was a 10% chance of recovery. Thirteen (15%) wanted to block intubation even if the chance of recovery was 50. Results were similar for wishes regarding CPR. These data suggest substantial differences of patient, physician, and family member understanding of living wills. Living wills did not reflect fully patients' expectations of receiving (or not receiving) life-sustaining modalities.

Key Words: living will • advance directive • end-of-life • critical care • death

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Smith, A. P. Ries, B. Zhang, J. A. Tulsky, H. G. Prigerson, and S. D. Block Resident Approaches to Advance Care Planning on the Day of Hospital Admission. Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2006; 166(15): 1597 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Labott Understanding a Patient's Wishes to Die Clinical Case Studies, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 220 - 230. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Knauft, E. L. Nielsen, R. A. Engelberg, D. L. Patrick, and J. R. Curtis Barriers and Facilitators to End-of-Life Care Communication for Patients with COPD Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2188 - 2196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. McAdam, N. A. Stotts, G. Padilla, and K. Puntillo Attitudes of Critically Ill Filipino Patients and Their Families Toward Advance Directives Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Tobin Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2002 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 294 - 305. [Full Text] [PDF]