help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noppen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noppen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, A.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 165. pp. 1240-1244, (2002)
© 2002 American Thoracic Society


Original Article

Manual Aspiration versus Chest Tube Drainage in First Episodes of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study

Marc Noppen, Patrick Alexander, Peter Driesen, Hans Slabbynck and André Verstraeten

Vlaamse Werkgroep voor Medische Thoracoscopie en Interventionele Pneumologie, Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Marc Noppen, M.D., Ph.D., Head, Interventional Endoscopy Clinic, Academic Hospital AZ-VUB, 101, Laarbeeklaan, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: marc.noppen{at}az.vub.ac.be

Although there is no agreement on the optimal treatment of patients presenting with a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, the majority of physicians prefer chest tube drainage for air evacuation. Manual aspiration of air has been proposed by some, but lack of sound comparative data and safety data has limited its use. In this first randomized, prospective, multicenter pilot study, 60 patients with a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax were randomly allocated to manual aspiration (n = 27) or chest tube drainage (n = 33). Immediate success was obtained in 16 out of 27 (59.3%) in the manual aspiration group, and in 21 out of 33 (63.6%) in the chest tube drainage group (p = 0.9). One-week success rates were 25 out of 27 (93%) in the intention-to-treat manual aspiration group and 28 out of 33 (85%) in the chest tube drainage group (p = 0.4). Fourteen of 27 manual aspiration patients (52%) were hospitalized, versus 100% of the chest tube drainage patients (p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates with at least 1-year follow-up were 7 out of 26 (26%) in the manual aspiration group, and 9 out of 33 (27.3%) in the chest tube drainage group (p = 0.9). There were no complications associated with manual aspiration. Although statistical power is insufficient to formally confirm therapeutic equality, this pilot study suggests that in first episodes of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, manual aspiration seems equally effective as chest tube drainage and is safe, well tolerated, and feasible as an outpatient procedure in the majority of patients.

Key Words: spontaneous pneumothorax • manual aspiration • chest tube drainage • recurrence




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J-M. Tschopp, R. Rami-Porta, M. Noppen, and P. Astoul
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: state of the art.
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2006; 28(3): 637 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. R. Kuester, S. Frese, R. M. Stein, T. Roth, M. Beshay, and R. A. Schmid
Treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Switzerland: results of a survey
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2006; 5(2): 139 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. T. Henry
Simple sequential treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: one step closer.
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 448 - 450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C-H. Marquette, A. Marx, S. Leroy, F. Vaniet, P. Ramon, S. Caussade, N. Smaiti, C. Bonfils, and the Pneumothorax Study Group
Simplified stepwise management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a pilot study.
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 470 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. K. Ayed, C. Chandrasekaran, and M. Sukumar
Aspiration versus tube drainage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomised study.
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 477 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M Noppen, S Verbanck, J Harvey, R Van Herreweghe, M Meysman, W Vincken, and M Paiva
Music: a new cause of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
Thorax, August 1, 2004; 59(8): 722 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S Packham and P Jaiswal
Spontaneous pneumothorax: use of aspiration and outcomes of management by respiratory and general physicians
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2003; 79(932): 345 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M Henry, T Arnold, and J Harvey
BTS guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(90002): ii39 - 52.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pollution, Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Transplantation, Pleural Disease, and Lung Cancer in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 356 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. W. Light
Manual Aspiration: The Preferred Method for Managing Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2002; 165(9): 1202 - 1203.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society