help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 165, Number 4, February 2002, 540-550

Understanding Costs and Cost-Effectiveness in Critical Care
Report from the Second American Thoracic Society Workshop on Outcomes Research

Economic evaluations are increasingly common in the critical care literature, although approaches to their conduct are not standardized. The American Thoracic Society convened a workshop to address methodologic and reporting issues for economic analyses in critical care and to determine how guidelines from the U.S. Public Health Service Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine (PCEHM) were applicable to critical care. We identified several issues that hamper cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) in the critically ill. Data on the effectiveness of intensive care unit (ICU) interventions are often lacking; ICU patients are complex, with multiple concurrent problems and interventions; most ICU therapies are only supportive, and therefore may not individually result in improved outcome; accurate cost data are not commonly available and are difficult to obtain; there is no standardized approach for measuring or valuing costs across countries; typical outcomes in ICU studies (e.g., short-term mortality) are not ideal for CEAs while preferred outcomes for CEAs (e.g., long-term quality-adjusted survival) are rarely collected; valuing the importance of appropriate end-of-life care, an important aspect of ICU care, is difficult, and the burden of critical illness on family members is not easily captured in a CEA. Nevertheless, many of these problems are not unique to critical care, and we believe the PCEHM guidelines can be adapted to the critical care setting. We recommend all CEAs in the critically ill include a PCEHM reference case, where the cost-effectiveness ratio is calculated by adopting a societal perspective, estimating long-term costs and quality of life after ICU care, applying a 3% annual discount rate to costs and effects, and conducting multiway sensitivity analyses. Because elements of the reference case, such as long-term costs and quality of life, may only be estimated using modeling and assumptions, we also recommend inclusion of a "data-rich" case, where the cost-effectiveness ratio is generated as closely as possible from data on actual patient outcomes and costs (e.g., hospital costs per hospital survivor). We recommend that investigators conducting a CEA concurrently with a randomized trial make the proposed model available (e.g., via the Internet) before unblinding of trial data to minimize bias. Adopting a standard approach to CEAs of ICU therapies will provide a valid and more transparent evidence base for health care policy with regard to care of the critically ill.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. S. Watson, G. Clermont, J. P. Kinsella, L. Kong, R. E. Arendt, G. Cutter, W. T. Linde-Zwirble, S. H. Abman, D. C. Angus, and on behalf of the Prolonged Outcomes After Nitric O
Clinical and Economic Effects of iNO in Premature Newborns With Respiratory Failure at 1 Year
Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 124(5): 1333 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. H. Scheetz, M. K. Bolon, M. Postelnick, G. A. Noskin, and T. A. Lee
Cost-effectiveness analysis of an antimicrobial stewardship team on bloodstream infections: a probabilistic analysis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2009; 63(4): 816 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. L Erstad
A Primer on Critical Care Pharmacy Services
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2008; 42(12): 1871 - 1881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Manaker, A. Ernst, and L. Marcus
Affording Endobronchial Ultrasound
Chest, April 1, 2008; 133(4): 842 - 843.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
F. R. Ernst, H. Levy, and R. L. Qualy
Simplified Pharmacoeconomics of Critical Care and Severe Sepsis
J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2007; 22(5): 283 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. B. Milbrandt and D. C. Angus
What's in a Day?
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3091 - 3093.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. T. Beinfeld and G. S. Gazelle
Diagnostic Imaging Costs: Are They Driving Up the Costs of Hospital Care?
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 934 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. E. Cox, S. S. Carson, and A. K. Biddle
Cost-effectiveness of Ultrasound in Preventing Femoral Venous Catheter-associated Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2003; 168(12): 1481 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. C. Angus, G. Clermont, R. S. Watson, W. T. Linde-Zwirble, R. H. Clark, and M. S. Roberts
Cost-Effectiveness of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Failure in the United States
Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1351 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 294 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
R. S. Watson and D. C. Angus
Assessing Outcomes in Critical Care
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2002; 17(3): 103 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Clinical Skills Tests