Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 165, Number 3, February 2002, 345-348

Embolus Location Affects the Sensitivity of a Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

WOUTER DE MONYÉ, BERND-JAN SANSON, MELVIN R. MAC GILLAVRY, PETER M. T. PATTYNAMA, HARRY R. BÜLLER, ANNETTE A. VAN DEN BERG-HUYSMANS, and MENNO V. HUISMAN, On behalf of the ANTELOPE-Study Group

Departments of General Internal Medicine and Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center; Department of Internal Medicine, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

D-dimer blood tests have been suggested to rule out pulmonary embolism. Despite evidence of the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a normal D-dimer assay result, clinicians remain reluctant to use a D-dimer assay as a sole diagnostic test. This prospective study in 314 consecutive inpatients and outpatients investigates the relation between the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer plasma concentration and pulmonary embolus location. Plasma D-dimer levels were measured using a quantitative immunoturbidimetric method. A strict protocol of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, pulmonary angiography, and spiral computed tomography was used to arrive at a final diagnosis and to assess the largest pulmonary artery in which embolus was visible. The influence of embolus location on the diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. There was a strong correlation between plasma D-dimer concentration and embolus location (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.001). Thus, the assay showed greater accuracy in excluding segmental or larger emboli (sensitivity = 93%) than subsegmental emboli (sensitivity = 50%). D-dimer concentration and the accuracy of D-dimer assays are clearly dependent on embolus location and smaller, subsegmental emboli may be missed when D-dimer assays are used as a sole test to exclude pulmonary embolism.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. King, A. A. Vaze, C. S. Moskowitz, L. J. Smith, and M. S. Ginsberg D-Dimer Assay to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Oncologic Population: Correlation with CT Pulmonary Angiography in an Urgent Care Setting Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 854 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Rathbun, T. L. Whitsett, S. K. Vesely, and G. E. Raskob Clinical Utility of D-dimer in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Nondiagnostic Lung Scans or Negative CT Findings Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 851 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Froehling, P. L. Elkin, S. J. Swensen, J. A. Heit, V. S. Pankratz, and J. H. Ryu Sensitivity and Specificity of the Semiquantitative Latex Agglutination D-Dimer Assay for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism as Defined by Computed Tomographic Angiography Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2004; 79(2): 164 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. D. Frost, D. J. Brotman, and F. A. Michota Rational Use of D-Dimer Measurement to Exclude Acute Venous Thromboembolic Disease Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2003; 78(11): 1385 - 1391. [Abstract] [PDF]

				British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Tobin Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pollution, Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Transplantation, Pleural Disease, and Lung Cancer in AJRCCM 2002 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 356 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kearon Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 21, 2003; 168(2): 183 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D-Dimer Assay Is Insensitive for Subsegmental Pulmonary Emboli Journal Watch (General), March 5, 2002; 2002(305): 5 - 5. [Full Text]