help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOTCHKISS, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by CROOKE, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOTCHKISS, J. R., JR.
Right arrow Articles by CROOKE, P. S.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 165, Number 1, January 2002, 47-53

Oscillations and Noise
Inherent Instability of Pressure Support Ventilation?

JOHN R. HOTCHKISS JR., ALEXANDER B. ADAMS, MARY K. STONE, DAVID J. DRIES, JOHN J. MARINI, and PHILIP S. CROOKE

Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care and Section of Surgery, Regions Hospital and University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is almost universally employed in the management of actively breathing ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure. In this partial support mode of ventilation, a fixed pressure is applied to the airway opening, and flow delivery is monitored by the ventilator. Inspiration is terminated when measured inspiratory flow falls below a set fraction of the peak flow rate (flow cutoff); the ventilator then cycles to a lower pressure and expiration commences. We used linear and nonlinear mathematical models to investigate the dynamic behavior of pressure support ventilation and confirmed the predicted behavior using a test lung. Our mathematical and laboratory analyses indicate that pressure support ventilation in the setting of airflow obstruction can be accompanied by marked variations in tidal volume and end-expiratory alveolar pressure, even when subject effort is unvarying. Unstable behavior was observed in the simplest plausible linear mathematical model and is an inherent consequence of the underlying dynamics of this mode of ventilation. The mechanism underlying the observed instability is "feed forward" behavior mediated by oscillatory elevation in end-expiratory pressure. In both mathematical and mechanical models, unstable behavior occurred at impedance values and ventilator settings that are clinically realistic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
E. Kondili, G. Prinianakis, and D. Georgopoulos
Patient-ventilator interaction
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 106 - 119.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 294 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Parthasarathy and M. J. Tobin
Effect of Ventilator Mode on Sleep Quality in Critically Ill Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2002; 166(11): 1423 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
B. Schonhofer and S. Sortor-Leger
Equipment needs for noninvasive mechanical ventilation
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2002; 20(4): 1029 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society