help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEROM, E.
Right arrow Articles by PAUWELS, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DEROM, E.
Right arrow Articles by PAUWELS, R.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 8, October 2001, 1398-1402

Lung Deposition and Protective Effect of Terbutaline Delivered from Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers and the Turbuhaler in Asthmatic Individuals

ERIC DEROM, LARS BORGSTRÖM, JAN VAN SCHOOR, ANN-BRITT LÖFROOS, and ROMAIN PAUWELS

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; and Experimental Medicine, AstraZeneca Research and Development, Lund, Sweden

We investigated the relationship between pulmonary deposition of terbutaline and bronchoprotection against methacholine and histamine with the Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden) and a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) in 13 asthmatic patients. The study was done with a randomized, double blind, double dummy, and crossover design. On different days, the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20 histamine) and PC20 methacholine were determined before and at 1.5, 3, and 6 h after inhalation of 0.25 or 0.5 mg of terbutaline sulfate. The Turbuhaler delivered significantly more drug than did the pMDI (% of the nominal metered dose and 95% confidence interval): 20.8% (16.4 to 26.6%) and 16.9% (13.2 to 21.7%) versus 4.8% (3.8 to 6.1%) and 7.4% (5.8 to 9.5%), respectively. Average protection against histamine over 6 h was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.45 to 0.87) doubling concentrations (DC) after inhalation of 0.25 mg and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.29) DC after 0.5 mg terbutaline via pMDI, and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.29) DC after 0.25 mg and 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.45) DC after 0.50 mg via Turbuhaler. Protection against methacholine was also dose- and device-dependent. The dose needed to obtain the same pulmonary deposition with the pMDI was 3.14 times greater than with the Turbuhaler, and that needed for the same protective effect was 2.1 and 3.2 times greater for histamine and methacholine, respectively. We conclude that pulmonary deposition of terbutaline was predictive of the clinical response.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
W. Janssens, P. VandenBrande, E. Hardeman, E. De Langhe, T. Philps, T. Troosters, and M. Decramer
Inspiratory flow rates at different levels of resistance in elderly COPD patients
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 78 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. Agertoft and S. Pedersen
Lung Deposition and Systemic Availability of Fluticasone Diskus and Budesonide Turbuhaler in Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 779 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M.T. Newhouse, P. Patel, and M. Parry-Billings
Protection against methacholine-induced bronchospasm: salbutamol pMDI versus Clickhaler(R) DPI
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2003; 21(5): 816 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Asthma, Airway Biology, and Nasal Disorders in AJRCCM 2001
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 598 - 618.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society
  2nd Annual Dinner