Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 7, October 2001, 1221-1224

A Comparison of Myocardial Function after Primary Cardiac and Primary Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest

TAKASHI KAMOHARA, MAX HARRY WEIL, WANCHUN TANG, SHIJIE SUN, HITOSHI YAMAGUCHI, KADA KLOUCHE, and JOE BISERA

Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Palm Springs, California; and Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Although myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been extensively investigated, less is known of the function of the myocardium after asphyxial cardiac arrest. The present experimental study was designed to compare postresuscitation left ventricular (LV) function after cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia with that of cardiac arrest induced by dysrhythmia. Four groups of Sprague-Dawley rats, which included eight animals in each group, were investigated. In the first two groups, cardiac arrest followed asphyxia produced by neuromuscular blockade with and without airway obstruction. In a third group, cardiac arrest was induced by electrical fibrillation of the ventricle. The fourth group represented animals in which the duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest was maintained for a time interval corresponding to that of the VF group. The fourth group received approximately the same number of electrical shocks as the third (VF) group. All animals were successfully resuscitated with precordial compression and mechanical ventilation. Postresuscitation measurements, including cardiac output, LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), rate of pressure rise at LV pressure of 40 mm Hg (LV dP/dt₄₀), and negative LV dP/dt, demonstrated decreased myocardial function in each group. No differences in cardiac function were observed between the animals with primary respiratory arrest whether or not the airway was obstructed. However, disproportionate and consistently greater impairment in myocardial function followed primary cardiac arrest due to VF when compared with equal duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest. We conclude that in this healthy animal model, asphyxial cardiac arrest resulted in significantly lesser impairment of postresuscitation myocardial function when compared with cardiac arrest caused by VF.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitati The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): e955 - e977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. McCaul, P. J. McNamara, D. Engelberts, G. J. Wilson, A. Romaschin, A. N. Redington, and B. P. Kavanagh Epinephrine Increases Mortality after Brief Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest in an In Vivo Rat Model Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 542 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Part 6: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-73 - III-90. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Weil, W. Tang, and J. Bisera Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: One Size Does Not Fit All Circulation, February 18, 2003; 107(6): 794 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Weil Erratum: A Comparison of Myocardial Function After Primary Cardiac and Primary Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2002; 166(5): 774 - 774. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. TOBIN Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583. [Full Text] [PDF]