Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 5, September 2001, 813-818

Side Effects of Mandibular Advancement Devices for Sleep Apnea Treatment

KARSTEN M. FRITSCH, ANGELO ISELI, ERICH W. RUSSI, and KONRAD E. BLOCH

Pulmonary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; and the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Our purpose was to investigate side effects of sleep apnea treatment by removable oral appliances (OA) that advance the mandible. In 22 patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), questionnaire evaluations, polysomnographies, cephalographies, and dental plaster casts were obtained before initiation of treatment with OA that fully covered both dental arches. Patients were reevaluated after 3 to 12 mo (questionnaires, polysomnographies) and 12 to 30 mo (questionnaires, cephalographies, plaster casts) during continuous treatment. Polysomnographies confirmed improved breathing by OA. All patients experienced persistent alleviation of symptoms after 12 to 30 mo and wished to continue treatment. Side effects were common but only mildly disturbing: mucosal dryness (86% of patients), tooth discomfort (59%), and hypersalivation (55%). Cephalographies revealed a decrease in the mean (± SE) upper incisors to maxillary plane angle from 102 ± 2° at baseline, to 101 ± 2° after 12 to 30 mo (p < 0.05). Overbite and overjet were also slightly (mean reduction < 1 mm) but significantly reduced. None of these side effects required discontinuation of treatment. OA are an effective therapy of obstructive sleep apnea. Mild side effects are common but rarely require intervention. Nevertheless, close follow-up during long-term therapy by OA is advisable in order to timely detect potentially relevant orthodontic changes.

Keywords: sleep apnea; snoring; oral appliance; mandibular advancement devices; treatment; side effects

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Hoekema, B. Stegenga, and L.G.M. de Bont EFFICACY AND CO-MORBIDITY OF ORAL APPLIANCES IN THE TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA-HYPOPNEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, May 1, 2004; 15(3): 137 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lorber Mechanisms and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea JAMA, February 4, 2004; 291(5): 557 - 557. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Rose, R. Staats, C. Virchow Jr, and I. E. Jonas Occlusal and Skeletal Effects of an Oral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea* Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 871 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R P Millman and C L Rosenberg Are oral appliances a substitute for nasal positive airway pressure? Thorax, April 1, 2002; 57(4): 283 - 284. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Eveloff Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea : No Longer Just a Lot of Hot Air Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 674 - 677. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. TOBIN Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, and Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 584 - 597. [Full Text] [PDF]