help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CALHOUN, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by DORINSKY, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CALHOUN, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by DORINSKY, P.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 5, September 2001, 759-763

Comparison of Fluticasone Propionate-Salmeterol Combination Therapy and Montelukast in Patients Who Are Symptomatic on Short-acting beta 2-Agonists Alone

WILLIAM J. CALHOUN, HAROLD S. NELSON, ROBERT A. NATHAN, PAMELA J. PEPSIN, CHRIS KALBERG, AMANDA EMMETT, KATHLEEN A. RICKARD, and PAUL DORINSKY

Asthma, Allergy, and Airway Research Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado; Asthma and Allergy Associates, PC, Colorado Springs, Colorado; and GlaxoWellcome, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

The objective of this study was to determine whether initial maintenance therapy for the treatment of inflammation and bronchoconstriction associated with persistent asthma is more effective with a combination product (100 µg of fluticasone propionate and 50 µg of salmeterol [FSC]) administered twice daily through the Diskus device (GlaxoWellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) or with montelukast at 10 mg once daily. A 12-wk, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted with 423 patients 15 yr of age and older with asthma and who were symptomatic while receiving short-acting beta 2-agonists alone. At end point, FSC resulted in significantly greater increases in morning predose FEV1 (0.54 ± 0.03 vs. 0.27 ± 0.03 L), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (89.9 ± 6.7 vs. 34.2 ± 4.7 L/min), evening PEF (69.9 ± 5.8 vs. 31.1 ± 4.5 L/min), the percentage of symptom-free days (48.9 ± 2.9 vs. 21.7 ± 2.5%), the percentage of rescue-free days (53.0 ± 2.8 vs. 26.2 ± 2.5%), and the percentage of nights with no awakenings (23.0 ± 2.5 vs. 15.5±2.4%) compared with montelukast (p =< 0.001, all comparisons). FSC significantly reduced asthma symptom scores (-1.0 ± 0.1 vs. -0.6 ± 0.1), rescue albuterol use (-3.3 ± 0.2 vs. -1.9 ± 0.2 puffs/d), and the number of exacerbations (0 vs. 11) compared with montelukast (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. In summary, treatment of the two main components of asthma (inflammation and bronchoconstriction) with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in a combination product was a more effective initial maintenance treatment strategy than treatment with montelukast, a single-mediator antagonist.

Keywords: adrenal cortex hormones; antiasthmatic agents; asthma; fluticasone propionate; leukotriene antagonists; long-acting beta 2-agonists; montelukast




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Trop PediatrHome page
V. Kumar, P. Ramesh, R. Lodha, R. M. Pandey, and S. K. Kabra
Montelukast vs. Inhaled Low-Dose Budesonide as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Mild Persistent Asthma: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial
J Trop Pediatr, October 1, 2007; 53(5): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. M. Drazen
Asthma and the Human Genome Project: Summary of the 45th Annual Thomas L. Petty Aspen Lung Conference
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(2007): 447S - 449S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. Ilowite and W. J. Calhoun
INITIAL THERAPY IN CLINICAL ASTHMA STUDIES OFTEN DOES NOT EQUAL THERAPY FOR MILD, PERSISTENT ASTHMA
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 1022 - 1022.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. J. Lipworth and W. J. Calhoun
THE STEP 3 DILEMMA FOR MODERATE PERSISTENT ASTHMA
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 1022a - 1023.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Asthma, Airway Biology, and Nasal Disorders in AJRCCM 2001
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 598 - 618.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society