help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VITACCA, M.
Right arrow Articles by AMBROSINO, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VITACCA, M.
Right arrow Articles by AMBROSINO, N.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 2, July 2001, 225-230

Comparison of Two Methods for Weaning Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Requiring Mechanical Ventilation for More Than 15 Days

MICHELE VITACCA, ANDREA VIANELLO, DANIELE COLOMBO, ENRICO CLINI, ROBERTO PORTA, LUCA BIANCHI, GIOVANNA ARCARO, GIOVANNI VITALE, ENRICO GUFFANTI, ALBINO LO COCO, and NICOLINO AMBROSINO

Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Gussago, Lung Function Unit, Gussago, Italy; Ospedale Civile, Padova, Italy; INRCA Casatenovo, Italy; and Ospedale Civico, Palermo, Italy

We designed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study in three long-term weaning units (LWU) to evaluate which protocol, inspiratory pressure support ventilation (PSV) or spontaneous breathing trials (SB), is more effective in weaning patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 15 d. Fifty-two of 75 patients, failing an initial T-piece trial at admission, were randomly assigned to PSV or SB (26 in both groups). No significant difference was found in weaning success rate (73% versus 77% in the PSV and SB group, respectively), mortality rate (11.5% versus 7.6%), duration of ventilatory assistance (181 ± 161 versus 130 ± 106 h), LWU (33 ± 12 versus 35 ± 19 d), or total hospital stay. The results of these defined protocols were retrospectively compared with an "uncontrolled clinical practice" in weaning historical control patients. The overall 30-d weaning success rate was significantly greater (87% versus 70%) and the time spent under mechanical ventilation by survived and weaned patients was shorter in the patients in the study than in historical control patients (103 ± 144 versus 170 ± 127 h). The LWU and hospital stays were also significantly shorter (27 ± 12 versus 38 ± 18 and 38 ± 17 versus 47 ± 18 d). Spontaneous breathing trials and decreasing levels of PSV are equally effective in difficult-to-wean patients with COPD. The application of a well-defined protocol, independent of the mode used, may result in better outcomes than uncontrolled clinical practice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ACCP Crit Care Med Brd RevHome page
S. K. Epstein
Weaning From Ventilatory Support
ACCP Crit Care Med Brd Rev, January 1, 2009; 20(0): 213 - 226.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
M. O'Shea Forbes
Prolonged Ventilator Dependence: Perspective of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patient
Clin Nurs Res, August 1, 2007; 16(3): 231 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J-M. Boles, J. Bion, A. Connors, M. Herridge, B. Marsh, C. Melot, R. Pearl, H. Silverman, M. Stanchina, A. Vieillard-Baron, et al.
Weaning from mechanical ventilation
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 1033 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
N. R. MacIntyre, S. K. Epstein, S. Carson, D. Scheinhorn, K. Christopher, and S. Muldoon
Management of Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: Report of a NAMDRC Consensus Conference
Chest, December 1, 2005; 128(6): 3937 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. S. Aboussouan, C. D. Lattin, and V. V. Anne
Determinants of Time-To-Weaning in a Specialized Respiratory Care Unit
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3117 - 3126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. Porta, M. Vitacca, L. S. Gile, E. Clini, L. Bianchi, E. Zanotti, and N. Ambrosino
Supported Arm Training in Patients Recently Weaned From Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2511 - 2520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Vitacca, L. Bianchi, L. Barbano, M. Ziliani, and N. Ambrosino
Effects of Acute on Chronic Respiratory Failure on Hypercapnia and 3-Month Survival
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1209 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Vitacca, L. Bianchi, E. Zanotti, A. Vianello, L. Barbano, R. Porta, and E. Clini
Assessment of Physiologic Variables and Subjective Comfort Under Different Levels of Pressure Support Ventilation
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 851 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. A. Krishnan, D. Moore, C. Robeson, C. S. Rand, and H. E. Fessler
A Prospective, Controlled Trial of a Protocol-based Strategy to Discontinue Mechanical Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2004; 169(6): 673 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. D. Truwit
Viewpoints to Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 1779 - 1780.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
L. A. Hoffman, F. J. Tasota, E. Delgado, T. G. Zullo, and M. R. Pinsky
Effect of Tracheal Gas Insufflation During Weaning From Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Preliminary Study
Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 31 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society
  CCM abstracts