Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 12, December 2001, 2248-2255

Assessment of a Bronchoscopy Simulator

DAVID OST, ANDREW DE ROSIERS, E. JAMES BRITT, ALAN M. FEIN, MARTIN L. LESSER, and ATUL C. MEHTA

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Department of Biostatics, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

The study objective was to validate a flexible bronchoscopy simulator by determining if it could differentiate between expert and novice bronchoscopists. A subsequent evaluation phase was then done to determine whether use of the simulator would improve the rate of bronchoscopy skill acquisition for new pulmonary fellows. A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed using a bronchoscopy simulator. Three cohorts were evaluated based on the number of bronchoscopies previously performed: "experts" (> 500, n = 9), "intermediates" (25 to 500, n = 8), and "novices" (none, n = 11). Each participant performed two simulated cases with performance measures being recorded by the simulator. Performance measures that distinguished between groups were then used to evaluate the learning curve for new fellows training on the simulator. A randomized-controlled trial was then conducted comparing the quality of bronchoscopy performance for new pulmonary fellows who were trained either with conventional methods or with the simulator. Expert bronchoscopists performed better on the simulator than intermediates who performed better than novices in terms of procedure time, percentage of segments visualized, time in red-out, and wall collisions. Training of new fellows demonstrated that after performing 20 bronchoscopic simulations, the skill level acquired with the simulator significantly improved in terms of speed, percentage of segments visualized, time in red-out, and collisions. Fellows trained on the simulator performed better than fellows trained using conventional methods during their first actual bronchoscopies as assessed by procedure time (815 versus 1,168 s, p = 0.001), a bronchoscopy nurse's subjective quality assessment score (7.7 ± 0.3 versus 3.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.05), and by a quantitative bronchoscopy quality score (percentage of segments correctly identified/procedure time, 0.119 ± 0.015 versus 0.046 ± 034, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the bronchoscopy simulator was able to accurately assess bronchoscopy experience level. Training new fellows on the bronchoscopy simulator leads to more rapid acquisition of bronchoscopy expertise compared with conventional training methods. This technology has the potential to facilitate bronchoscopy training and to improve objective evaluations of bronchoscopy skills.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Ost, G. A. Eapen, C. A. Jimenez, and R. C. Morice Improving Procedural Training and Certification in Pulmonary Medicine Chest, January 1, 2010; 137(1): 6 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Feller-Kopman Bronchoscopy and Interventional Pulmonology ACCP Pulmonary Med Brd Rev, January 1, 2009; 25(0): 205 - 218. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Di Domenico, C. Simonassi, and L. Chessa Inexpensive anatomical trainer for bronchoscopy Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 567 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Ouellette The safety of bronchoscopy in a pulmonary fellowship program. Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1185 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sinz Simulation-Based Education for Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Anesthesiology Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 291 - 307. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. P. Eason Simulation Devices in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 309 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T. Wong, K. Lai, F. F. Chung, and R. Y. Ho Cannot Intubate-Cannot Ventilate and Difficult Intubation Strategies: Results of a Canadian National Survey Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1439 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Lunn, R. Garland, L. Gryniuk, L. Smith, D. Feller-Kopman, and A. Ernst Reducing Maintenance and Repair Costs in an Interventional Pulmonology Program Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1382 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Martinsen and N. Jukes Towards a Humane Veterinary Education J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2005; 32(4): 454 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Jasinevicius, M. Landers, S. Nelson, and A. Urbankova An Evaluation of Two Dental Simulation Systems: Virtual Reality versus Contemporary Non-Computer-Assisted J Dent Educ., November 1, 2004; 68(11): 1151 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Onodera, T. Omatsu, S. Takeuchi, N. Shinagawa, K. Yamazaki, T. Nishioka, and K. Miyasaka Enhanced Virtual Bronchoscopy Using the Pulmonary Artery: Improvement in Route Mapping for Ultraselective Transbronchial Lung Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1103 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Lechtzin, H. R. Rubin, P. White Jr., M. Jenckes, and G. B. Diette Patient Satisfaction with Bronchoscopy Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2002; 166(10): 1326 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. TOBIN Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, and Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 584 - 597. [Full Text] [PDF]