help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GORINI, M.
Right arrow Articles by TOZZI, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GORINI, M.
Right arrow Articles by TOZZI, D.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 163, Number 7, June 2001, 1614-1618

Physiologic Effects of Negative Pressure Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

MASSIMO GORINI, ANTONIO CORRADO, GIUSEPPE VILLELLA, ROBERTA GINANNI, ANNIKE AUGUSTYNEN, and DONATELLA TOZZI

Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy

To assess the physiologic effects of continuous negative extrathoracic pressure (CNEP), negative pressure ventilation (NPV), and negative extrathoracic end-expiratory pressure (NEEP) added to NPV in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we measured in seven patients ventilatory pattern, arterial blood gases, respiratory mechanics, and pressure- time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi) under four conditions: (1) spontaneous breathing (SB); (2) CNEP (-5 cm H2O); (3) NPV; (4) NPV plus NEEP. CNEP and NPV were provided by a microprocessor-based iron lung capable of thermistor-triggering. Compared with SB, CNEP improved slightly but significantly PaCO2 and pH, and decreased PTPdi (388 ± 59 versus 302 ± 43 cm H2O · s, respectively, p < 0.05) and dynamic intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) (4.6 ± 0.5 versus 2.1 ± 0.3 cm H2O, respectively, p < 0.001). NPV increased minute ventilation (V E), improved arterial blood gases, and decreased PTPdi to 34% of value during SB (p < 0.001). NEEP added to NPV further slightly decreased PTPdi and improved patient-ventilator interaction by reducing dynamic PEEPi and nontriggering inspiratory efforts. We conclude that CNEP and NPV, provided by microprocessor-based iron lung, are able to improve ventilatory pattern and arterial blood gases, and to unload inspiratory muscles in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
A. Corrado and M. Gorini
Negative-pressure ventilation: is there still a role?
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(1): 187 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
M Gorini, G Villella, R Ginanni, A Augustynen, D Tozzi, and A Corrado
Effect of assist negative pressure ventilation by microprocessor based iron lung on breathing effort
Thorax, March 1, 2002; 57(3): 258 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society