Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 162, Number 6, December 2000, 2113-2116

Delayed Distension of Contracted Airways with Lung Inflation In Vivo

ROBERT H. BROWN and WAYNE MITZNER

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Environmental Health Sciences, Radiology, and Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

A deep inspiratory sigh is one of the most severe dynamic stresses that lungs normally experience. It typically is a very transient phenomenon, normally lasting only about 2 to 3 s. The airway response to a deep inspiration has been shown to be different in asthmatic and normal individuals. When airway smooth muscle (ASM) is contracted in normal subjects, a deep inspiration results in a subsequent dilation of the airways. However, in asthmatic subjects, a deep inspiration often results in little change in airway function, and sometimes results in an even further contraction of ASM. The mechanism underlying this difference depends on the dynamic behavior of both ASM and the lung parenchyma. If the contracted muscle had slower dynamic responses than the lung parenchyma, the timing of the deep inspiratory maneuver could affect the airway response. In the present study, we designed an experiment to determine how well matched the dynamic response is of airways to that of the lung parenchyma. The results clearly demonstrate that airways contracted with methacholine dilate at about a rate four times slower than that of the lung parenchyma during rapid lung inflation and deflation. This effect may play a role in the unique response of asthmatic subjects to deep inspiration. The mechanism of this dynamic slowness of contracted airways probably involves intrinsic properties of the smooth-muscle contractile processes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. H. Brown, D. W. Kaczka, K. Fallano, S. Chen, and W. Mitzner Temporal variability in the responses of individual canine airways to methacholine J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2008; 104(5): 1381 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Sinclair, R. C. Molthen, S. T. Haworth, C. A. Dawson, and C. M. Waters Airway Strain during Mechanical Ventilation in an Intact Animal Model Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2007; 176(8): 786 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. D. Black, A. C. Henderson, H. Atileh, E. Israel, E. P. Ingenito, and K. R. Lutchen Relating maximum airway dilation and subsequent reconstriction to reactivity in human lungs J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1808 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Sly, R. A. Collins, C. Thamrin, D. J. Turner, and Z. Hantos Volume dependence of airway and tissue impedances in mice J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2003; 94(4): 1460 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Brown and W. Mitzner Airway response to deep inspiration: role of inflation pressure J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 2574 - 2578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. TOBIN Asthma, Airway Biology, and Allergic Rhinitis in AJRCCM 2000 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2001; 164(9): 1559 - 1580. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Y. Seow and J. J. Fredberg Signal Transduction in Smooth Muscle: Historical perspective on airway smooth muscle: the saga of a frustrated cell J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2001; 91(2): 938 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]