Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 162, Number 5, November 2000, 1648-1652

Twelve Months of Isoniazid Compared with Four Months of Isoniazid and Rifampin for Persons with Radiographic Evidence of Previous Tuberculosis
An Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

ROBERT M. JASMER, DAVID C. SNYDER, DANIEL P. CHIN, PHILIP C. HOPEWELL, STEPHANIE S. CUTHBERT, E. ANTONIO PAZ, and CHARLES L. DALEY

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; Francis J. Curry National Tuberculosis Center, San Francisco; Tuberculosis Control Branch, California Department of Health Services, Berkeley; and San Francisco Department of Public Health, Section on Tuberculosis Control, San Francisco, California

Isoniazid taken daily for 12 mo and isoniazid and rifampin taken daily for 4 mo are both recommended options for patients with radiographic evidence of previous tuberculosis and positive tuberculin skin tests who have not had prior treatment. We compared the completion rates, number of adverse effects, and cost effectiveness of these two regimens. Patients were treated at the San Francisco Tuberculosis Clinic from 1993 through 1996. A Markov model was developed to assess impact on life expectancy and costs. One thousand twenty-two patients, with a mean age of 52 yr, and > 90% foreign born, were treated; 545 received isoniazid and 477 received isoniazid and rifampin. For isoniazid, 79.8% completed 12 mo of therapy and 4.9% had adverse effects versus 83.6% completion, 6.1% adverse effects for isoniazid and rifampin (p > 0.05 for all between-group comparisons). Both regimens increased life expectancy by 1.4-1.5 yr. Compared with isoniazid, isoniazid and rifampin produced net incremental savings of $135 per patient treated. In patients with radiographic evidence of prior tuberculosis who have not been previously treated, isoniazid for 12 mo and isoniazid and rifampin for 4 mo have similar rates of completion and adverse effects, and both increase life expectancy compared with no treatment. Isoniazid and rifampin for 4 mo is cost saving compared with isoniazid alone. This advantage was maintained even when compared with 9 mo of isoniazid, the new American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control (ATS/CDC) recommendation for treatment with isoniazid alone.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. F. Fountain, E. Tolley, C. R. Chrisman, and T. H. Self Isoniazid Hepatotoxicity Associated With Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A 7-Year Evaluation From a Public Health Tuberculosis Clinic Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 116 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. LoBue and K. S. Moser Use of Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a Public Health Clinic Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2003; 168(4): 443 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Treatment of Tuberculosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 603 - 662. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. TOBIN Tuberculosis, Lung Infections, and Interstitial Lung Disease in AJRCCM 2000 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): 1774 - 1788. [Full Text] [PDF]