help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VASSILAKOPOULOS, T.
Right arrow Articles by ZAKYNTHINOS, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VASSILAKOPOULOS, T.
Right arrow Articles by ZAKYNTHINOS, S.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 161, Number 4, April 2000, 1372-1375

Contribution of Pain to Inspiratory Muscle Dysfunction after Upper Abdominal Surgery
A Randomized Controlled Trial

THEODOROS VASSILAKOPOULOS, ZAFIRIA MASTORA, PARASKEVI KATSAOUNOU, GEORGE DOUKAS, SERAFIM KLIMOPOULOS, CHARIS ROUSSOS, and SPYROS ZAKYNTHINOS

Department of Critical Care and Pulmonary Services, University of Athens Medical School, Evangelismos Hospital; Department of Surgery, University of Athens School of Nursing, Evgenidio Hospital; and Department of Surgery, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece

Upper abdominal surgery causes respiratory muscle dysfunction. Multiple factors have been implicated in the occurrence of such dysfunction; however, the role of pain remains unclear. To elucidate the role of pain, we studied 50 patients undergoing elective upper abdominal surgery in a randomized, controlled investigation. Inspiratory and expiratory muscle function were assessed through sniff mouth pressure (Psniff) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), respectively. Pain during the pressure maneuvers was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS). Measurements were made before surgery (Session 1), 24 h after surgery (Session 2), and 1 h later, after intramuscular administration of pethidine (analgesia group) or placebo (placebo group) (Session 3). To evaluate the effect of pain, we used a mixed-effects model with random intercept, having either Psniff or MEP as the dependent variable and both surgical operation and the level of pain as fixed effects. Upper abdominal surgery decreased Psniff in both the analgesia and placebo groups (from 70 ± 15 to 42 ± 11 cm H2O [p < 0.05] in the analgesia group, and from 69 ± 15 to 42 ± 10 cm H2O [p < 0.05] in the placebo group). Intramuscular pethidine caused an increase in Psniff to 56 ± 14 cm H2O (p < 0.05), whereas placebo had no effect. Pain increased comparably after upper abdominal surgery in both groups (from 0.3 ± 0.6 to 4.4 ± 1.5) [p < 0.05] in the analgesia group and from 0.4 ± 0.5 to 4.3 ± 1.5 [p < 0.05] in the placebo group). Intramuscular pethidine decreased pain as measured by VAS score to 2.1 ± 1.0 (p < 0.05) in the analgesia group, whereas placebo had no effect. Psniff had a statistically significant relationship to pain (p < 0.001). Adjusting for the occurrence of surgical operation did not affect this result. MEP showed the same tendency as Psniff, but the observed changes did not reach statistical significance. We conclude that pain contributes to inspiratory muscle dysfunction after upper abdominal surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Laghi and M. J. Tobin
Disorders of the Respiratory Muscles
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2003; 168(1): 10 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
I. Gilron, D. Tod, D. H. Goldstein, J. L. Parlow, and E. Orr
The Relationship Between Movement-Evoked Versus Spontaneous Pain and Peak Expiratory Flow After Abdominal Hysterectomy
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1702 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Sleep-disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, Pulmonary Function Testing, Nitric Oxide, and Bronchoscopy in AJRCCM 2000
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2001; 164(8): 1362 - 1375.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2000 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Par News