help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOJAT, M.
Right arrow Articles by BROCHARD, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DOJAT, M.
Right arrow Articles by BROCHARD, L.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 161, Number 4, April 2000, 1161-1166

Clinical Evaluation of a Computer-controlled Pressure Support Mode

MICHEL DOJAT, ALAIN HARF, DOMINIQUE TOUCHARD, FRANÇOIS LEMAIRE, and LAURENT BROCHARD

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U 492, Département de Physiologie, and Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Université Paris 12, Créteil, France

We have designed a computerized system providing closed-loop control of the level of pressure support ventilation (PSV). The system sets itself at the lowest level of PSV that maintains respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), and end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) within predetermined ranges defining acceptable ventilation (i.e., 12 < RR < 28 cycles/min, VT > 300 ml [> 250 if weight < 55 kg], and PETCO2 < 55 mm Hg [< 65 mm Hg if chronic CO2 retention]). Ten patients received computer-controlled (automatic) PSV and physician-controlled (standard) PSV, in random order, during 24 h for each mode. An estimation of occlusion pressure (P0.1) was recorded continuously. The average time spent with acceptable ventilation as previously defined was 66 ± 24% of the total ventilation time with standard PSV versus 93 ± 8% with automatic PSV (p < 0.05), whereas the level of PSV was similar during the two periods (17 ± 4 cm H2O versus 19 ± 6 cm H2O). The time spent with an estimated P0.1 above 4 cm H2O was 34 ± 35% of the standard PSV time versus only 11 ± 17% of the automatic PSV time (p < 0.01). Automatic PSV increased the time spent within desired ventilation parameter ranges and apparently reduced periods of excessive workload.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
N. MacIntyre
Discontinuing Mechanical Ventilatory Support
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 1049 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
J-M. Boles, J. Bion, A. Connors, M. Herridge, B. Marsh, C. Melot, R. Pearl, H. Silverman, M. Stanchina, A. Vieillard-Baron, et al.
Weaning from mechanical ventilation
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 1033 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
D. K. Vawdrey, R. M. Gardner, R. S. Evans, J. F. Orme Jr., T. P. Clemmer, L. Greenway, and F. A. Drews
Assessing Data Quality in Manual Entry of Ventilator Settings
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 295 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Lellouche, J. Mancebo, P. Jolliet, J. Roeseler, F. Schortgen, M. Dojat, B. Cabello, L. Bouadma, P. Rodriguez, S. Maggiore, et al.
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Computer-driven Protocolized Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2006; 174(8): 894 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
A. Garland
Improving the ICU: Part 2
Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2165 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. Spahija, J. Beck, M. de Marchie, A. Comtois, and C. Sinderby
Closed-Loop Control of Respiratory Drive Using Pressure-Support Ventilation: Target Drive Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2005; 171(9): 1009 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
M. Vitacca, L. Bianchi, E. Zanotti, A. Vianello, L. Barbano, R. Porta, and E. Clini
Assessment of Physiologic Variables and Subjective Comfort Under Different Levels of Pressure Support Ventilation
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 851 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. H. Petter, R. L. Chiolero, T. Cassina, P.-G. Chassot, X. M. Muller, and J.-P. Revelly
Automatic "Respirator/Weaning" with Adaptive Support Ventilation: The Effect on Duration of Endotracheal Intubation and Patient Management
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1743 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
N. R. MacIntyre
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Weaning and Discontinuing Ventilatory Support : A Collective Task Force Facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine
Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6_suppl): 375S - 396S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
E. W. Ely, M. O. Meade, E. F. Haponik, M. H. Kollef, D. J. Cook, G. H. Guyatt, and J. K. Stoller
Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Protocols Driven by Nonphysician Health-Care Professionals : Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6_suppl): 454S - 463S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2000
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2001; 164(8): 1347 - 1361.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Ventilator Monitoring, and Sharing the Data with Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 810 - 811.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2000 American Thoracic Society