Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 160, Number 5, November 1999, 1540-1543

Comparison of Hallway and Treadmill Six-minute Walk Tests

DAMIEN STEVENS, ELLEN ELPERN, KAILASH SHARMA, PETER SZIDON, MICHAEL ANKIN, and STEVEN KESTEN

Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

The 6-min walk test (SMWT) performed in the hallway (HW) is used as a clinical indicator of functional capacity in patients with lung disease. A 6-min walk test utilizing a treadmill (TM) is easier to perform and allows easier patient monitoring. Therefore, we formulated a standardized TM SMWT protocol and compared the results with those of a HW SMWT. All patients were enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Patients with current infection, recent change in inhaled medications or oral steroid use, and significant cardiovascular disease were excluded. Each subject performed three HW SMWTs and three TM SMWTs assigned randomly on subsequent days. There was a 30-min rest between each walk and at least a 48-h rest between each test day. All patients completed both HW and TM SMWT within 7 d. Supplemental oxygen was utilized or increased if the saturation fell below 88%. The best of the three tests was used for data analysis. Twenty-one subjects completed the protocol. The mean age was 65 ± 10.9 yr (range, 35 to 79 yr). Ten subjects were receiving supplemental oxygen. The mean FEV₁ was 1.07 ± 0.53 L. The mean HW SMWT distance was 1,228 ± 255 ft (range, 612 to 1,679 ft) and the mean TM SMWT distance was 1,060 ± 389 ft (range, 475 to 1,819 ft), which were statistically different (p = 0.01). The mean difference was 168 ± 280 ft (range, 326 to 743 ft). Oxygen saturation and supplemental oxygen requirements did not differ significantly. The intra-test variability of the three HW SMWTs was similar to the three TM SMWTs and no significant difference in the coefficient of variation was found. A standardized TM SMWT is feasible and allows easier patient monitoring, but there is a statistically significant difference between the HW and TM SMWT distance and therefore they are not interchangeable. However, the intratest reproducibility of the TM and HW SMWTs are similar when three walks are performed in a single test session. The role of the TM SMWT in pulmonary rehabilitation requires further exploration. Stevens D, Elpern E, Sharma K, Szidon P, Ankin M, Kesten S. Comparison of hallway and treadmill six-minute walk tests.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Bansal, K. Hill, T. E. Dolmage, D. Brooks, L. J. Woon, and R. S. Goldstein Modifying Track Layout From Straight to Circular Has a Modest Effect on the 6-min Walk Distance Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1155 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ingle, R. J. Shelton, A. S. Rigby, S. Nabb, A. L. Clark, and J. G.F. Cleland The reproducibility and sensitivity of the 6-min walk test in elderly patients with chronic heart failure Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2005; 26(17): 1742 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Eaton, P. Young, D. Milne, and A. U. Wells Six-Minute Walk, Maximal Exercise Tests: Reproducibility in Fibrotic Interstitial Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2005; 171(10): 1150 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Azuma, T. Nukiwa, E. Tsuboi, M. Suga, S. Abe, K. Nakata, Y. Taguchi, S. Nagai, H. Itoh, M. Ohi, et al. Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2005; 171(9): 1040 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. N. Lama, K. R. Flaherty, G. B. Toews, T. V. Colby, W. D. Travis, Q. Long, S. Murray, E. A. Kazerooni, B. H. Gross, J. P. Lynch III, et al. Prognostic Value of Desaturation during a 6-Minute Walk Test in Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2003; 168(9): 1084 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Sciurba, G. J. Criner, S. M. Lee, Z. Mohsenifar, D. Shade, W. Slivka, and R. A. Wise Six-Minute Walk Distance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Reproducibility and Effect of Walking Course Layout and Length Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2003; 167(11): 1522 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Carter, D. B. Holiday, C. Nwasuruba, J. Stocks, C. Grothues, and B. Tiep 6-Minute Walk Work for Assessment of Functional Capacity in Patients With COPD Chest, May 1, 2003; 123(5): 1408 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2003; 167(2): 211 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Troosters, J. Vilaro, R. Rabinovich, A. Casas, J.A. Barbera, R. Rodriguez-Roisin, and J. Roca Physiological responses to the 6-min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2002; 20(3): 564 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2002; 166(1): 111 - 117. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Solway, D. Brooks, Y. Lacasse, and S. Thomas A Qualitative Systematic Overview of the Measurement Properties of Functional Walk Tests Used in the Cardiorespiratory Domain Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1): 256 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Elpern, D. Stevens, and S. Kesten Variability in Performance of Timed Walk Tests in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 98 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]