help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARAMESWARAN, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by HARGREAVE, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PARAMESWARAN, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by HARGREAVE, F. E.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 160, Number 1, July 1999, 354-357

Protection against Methacholine Bronchoconstriction to Assess Relative Potency of Inhaled beta 2-Agonist

KRISHNAN N. PARAMESWARAN, MARK D. INMAN, BRUCE P. EKHOLM, MARILYN M. MORRIS, EDIE SUMMERS, PAUL M. O'BYRNE, and FREDERICK E. HARGREAVE

Asthma Research Group, Departments of Medicine, St. Joseph's Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Statistical Data Services, 3M Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 3M Center, St. Paul, Minnesota

The purposes of this study were to estimate the relative dose potency (RP) of two formulations of salbutamol pressurized metered-dose inhalers (Proventil-HFA and Ventolin-CFC MDIs) to protect against methacholine bronchoconstriction, to validate this method and provide recommendations. The protective effects of 100-, 200-, and 400-µg doses of Proventil-HFA were compared with the same doses of Ventolin-CFC in 18 adult asthmatics (mean FEV1, 92% predicted; mean baseline PC20 methacholine, 1.8 mg/ml), in a dose-level blind, balanced, eight-period, crossover, placebo-controlled study. The log-transformed PC20 values after each dose of the drugs were compared by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significant dose-effect was present (p < 0.0001). Using the Finney assay, the RP of Proventil-HFA compared with Ventolin-CFC was 1.08 (90% CI, 0.81-1.46) (80% power). This was also estimated using a nonlinear Emax model to validate the Finney method. The most precise estimate of RP was obtained with the comparison between 100- and 200-µg doses (RP, 1.00; 90% CI, 0.77-1.31). There were no adverse events resulting from the drugs or methacholine. We conclude that Proventil-HFA salbutamol is bioequivalent to Ventolin-CFC salbutamol. Bronchoprotection to methacholine is a valid method of demonstrating bioequivalence. By this method, 100- and 200-µg doses of salbutamol inhalations from an MDI will suffice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. Hendeles, G. L. Colice, and R. J. Meyer
Withdrawal of Albuterol Inhalers Containing Chlorofluorocarbon Propellants
N. Engl. J. Med., March 29, 2007; 356(13): 1344 - 1351.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M Delvaux, M Henket, L Lau, P Kange, P Bartsch, R Djukanovic, and R Louis
Nebulised salbutamol administered during sputum induction improves bronchoprotection in patients with asthma
Thorax, February 1, 2004; 59(2): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M.T. Newhouse, P. Patel, and M. Parry-Billings
Protection against methacholine-induced bronchospasm: salbutamol pMDI versus Clickhaler(R) DPI
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2003; 21(5): 816 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. S F Ram, J. Wright, D. Brocklebank, and J. E S White
Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering beta 2 agonists bronchodilators in asthma
BMJ, October 20, 2001; 323(7318): 901 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. C. AHRENS, M. E. TERESI, S.-H. HAN, D. DONNELL, J. A. VANDEN BURGT, and C. R. LUX
Asthma Stability after Oral Prednisone . A Clinical Model for Comparing Inhaled Steroid Potency
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2001; 164(7): 1138 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1999 American Thoracic Society
  SOTA, FL