help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCKAY, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by ARMOUR, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MCKAY, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by ARMOUR, C. L.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 158, Number 4, October 1998, 1245-1252

Airway Structure and Function in Eisenmenger's Syndrome

KAREN O. MCKAY, PETER R. A. JOHNSON, JUDITH L. BLACK, ALLAN R. GLANVILLE, and CAROL L. ARMOUR

Departments of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Sydney; and the Cardiopulmonary Transplant Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

The responsiveness of airways from patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome (n = 5) was compared with that in airways from organ donors (n = 10). Enhanced contractile responses to cholinergic stimulation were found in airways from patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome. The maximal responses to acetylcholine, carbachol, and parasympathetic nerve stimulation in airway tissue from these patients were 221%, 139%, and 152%, respectively, of the maximal responses obtained in donor tissue. Further, relaxation responses to isoproterenol and levocromakalim were absent (n = 2) or markedly impaired (n = 3) in airways from patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome. This attenuated relaxation response was nonspecific in that it was also absent after vasoactive intestinal peptide, sodium nitroprusside, papaverine, and electrical field application. These observations can most likely be explained by a decrease in intrinsic smooth muscle tone, as precontraction of airways revealed relaxation responses that were equivalent to those obtained in donor tissues. Morphometric analysis of tissues used for the functional studies revealed no differences in the airway dimensions (internal perimeter) or airway wall components (e.g., smooth muscle, cartilage) or total area to explain these observations. Although the mechanism for this observed decrease in intrinsic airway smooth muscle tone is not certain, it may be due to alteration in the substructure of the airway wall or, alternatively, may result from the continued release of depressant factors in the vicinity of the smooth muscle which permanently alters smooth muscle responsiveness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. E. McParland, P. D. Pare, P. R. A. Johnson, C. L. Armour, and J. L. Black
Airway basement membrane perimeter in human airways is not a constant; potential implications for airway remodeling in asthma
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 556 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
J. Previte and P. Haran
Eisenmenger Syndrome
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 67 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1998 American Thoracic Society
  New Orleans Int'l Conf