help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURNS, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by JOHN GIBSON, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BURNS, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by JOHN GIBSON, G.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 158, Number 1, July 1998, 203-206

Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma
Not Just a Problem of Smooth Muscle Relaxation with Inspiration

GRAHAM P. BURNS and G. JOHN GIBSON

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma has been attributed to impaired ability of deep inspiration (DI) to stretch airway smooth muscle. We have retested this hypothesis by comparing the responses to methacholine of 10 asthmatic and 10 control subjects. After each dose subjects breathed tidally without deep inspiration for 4 min, followed by a forced partial expiration from which flow was measured at a constant volume, 35% baseline VC (Vp 35). This index is independent of both DI and increases in end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV). EILV increased significantly more in the asthmatic group than in the control group (15.0 versus 2.5% of baseline VC, p = 0.019), a factor that if not taken into account would tend to mask the difference in the two responses. Comparisons were made after a cumulative dose of 50 µg methacholine, which was the highest dose common to all subjects. The asthmatic response was significantly greater than that seen in the control group, with reductions to 25.9 and 72.1% of baseline Vp 35, respectively (p = 0.0007). We conclude that the sensitivity of asthmatic airways to methacholine is greater than that of normal airways even when DI is prohibited. Therefore, the hyperresponsiveness of asthmatic airways is not attributable simply to an inability of DI to stretch airway smooth muscle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
V. Brusasco and R. Pellegrino
Invited Review: Complexity of factors modulating airway narrowing in vivo: relevance to assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2003; 95(3): 1305 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G P Burns and G J Gibson
A novel hypothesis to explain the bronchconstrictor effect of deep inspiration in asthma
Thorax, February 1, 2002; 57(2): 116 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
K. R. LUTCHEN, A. JENSEN, H. ATILEH, D. W. KACZKA, E. ISRAEL, B. SUKI, and E. P. INGENITO
Airway Constriction Pattern Is a Central Component of Asthma Severity . The Role of Deep Inspirations
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2001; 164(2): 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
V. Brusasco, E. Crimi, G. Barisione, A. Spanevello, J. R. Rodarte, and R. Pellegrino
Airway responsiveness to methacholine: effects of deep inhalations and airway inflammation
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1999; 87(2): 567 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1998 American Thoracic Society