help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRAAT, J. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by RIJNTJES, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRAAT, J. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by RIJNTJES, E.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 157, Number 6, June 1998, 1748-1755

Intranasal Cold Dry Air Is Superior to Histamine Challenge in Determining the Presence and Degree of Nasal Hyperreactivity in Nonallergic Noninfectious Perennial Rhinitis

JOSEPH P. M. BRAAT, PAUL G. MULDER, WYTSKE J. FOKKENS, ROY GERTH van WIJK, and EVERT RIJNTJES

Departments of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Biostatistics, and Allergology, Erasmus University Rotterdam and University Hospital `Dijkzigt,' Rotterdam; and Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands

The objective of the study was to compare cold dry air (CDA) and histamine in differentiating patients with nonallergic noninfectious perennial rhinitis (NANIPER) from control subjects. Nasal reactivity (nasal patency, mucus production, and sneezing) in 16 symptomatic nonsmoking patients with NANIPER and seven nonsmoking control subjects was measured with standardized CDA and histamine provocation series in a randomized crossover study. Intranasal CDA resulted in increased mucus production and nasal blockage in a dose-dependent manner in patients with NANIPER but not in control subjects. Sneezing did not occur. The reproducibility of CDA for patency and mucus production was good. Sensitivity for CDA was 87% compared with 100% for histamine. However, specificity was 71% for CDA and 0% for histamine. It is concluded that the new standardized intranasal CDA provocation method uses a recognizable natural nonspecific stimulus and seems to be more suitable than histamine for characterizing and assessing the presence and degree of nasal reactivity in NANIPER.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1998 American Thoracic Society