help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MULTZ, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by SCHARF, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MULTZ, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by SCHARF, S. M.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 157, Number 5, May 1998, 1468-1473

A "Closed" Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Improves Resource Utilization When Compared with an "Open" MICU

ALAN S. MULTZ, DONALD B. CHALFIN, ISRAEL M. SAMSON, DAVID R. DANTZKER, ALAN M. FEIN, HARRY N. STEINBERG, MICHAEL S. NIEDERMAN, and STEVEN M. SCHARF

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Long Island Campus of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New Hyde Park; and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola; and the State University of New York Health Sciences Center at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York

We hypothesized that a "closed" intensive care unit (ICU) was more efficient that an "open" one. ICU admissions were retrospectively analyzed before and after ICU closure at one hospital; prospective analysis in that ICU with an open ICU nearby was done. Illness severity was gauged by the Mortality Prediction Model (MPM0). Outcomes included mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mechanical ventilation (MV). There were no differences in age, MPM0, and use of MV. ICU and hospital LOS were lower when "closed" (ICU LOS: prospective 6.1 versus 12.6 d, p < 0.0001; retrospective 6.1 versus 9.3 d, p < 0.05; hospital LOS: prospective 19.2 versus 33.2 d, p < 0.008; retrospective 22.2 versus 31.2 d, p < 0.02). Days on MV were lower when "closed" (prospective 2.3 versus 8.5 d, p < 0.0005; retrospective 3.3 versus 6.4 d, p < 0.05). Pooled data revealed the following: MV predicted ICU LOS; ICU organization and MPM0 predicted days on MV; MV and ICU organization predicted hospital LOS; mortality predictors were open ICU (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, p < 0.04), MPM0 (OR 1.16 for MPM0 increase 0.1, p < 0.002), and MV (OR 2.43, p < 0.0001). We conclude that patient care is more efficient with a closed ICU, and that mortality is not adversely affected.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. Adhikari and W. Sibbald
The Large Cost of Critical Care: Realities and Challenges
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 311 - 314.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
P. J. Pronovost, D. C. Angus, T. Dorman, K. A. Robinson, T. T. Dremsizov, and T. L. Young
Physician Staffing Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review
JAMA, November 6, 2002; 288(17): 2151 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, M. Engoren, and R. H. Habib
Safe, highly selective use of pulmonary artery catheters in coronary artery bypass grafting: an objective patient selection method
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1394 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch GeneralHome page
Decreased Length of Stay in a ""Closed"" MICU
Journal Watch (General), May 26, 1998; 1998(526): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1998 American Thoracic Society 		  ATS Par News