help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLOCH-SALISBURY, E.
Right arrow Articles by BANZETT, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BLOCH-SALISBURY, E.
Right arrow Articles by BANZETT, R. B.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 157, Number 2, February 1998, 415-420

Self-Control and External Control of Mechanical Ventilation Give Equal Air Hunger Relief

ELISABETH BLOCH-SALISBURY, CHRISTINA M. SPENGLER, ROBERT BROWN, and ROBERT B. BANZETT

Physiology Program, Harvard School of Public Health; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Section, Brockton/West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Elevated end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PETCO2) causes air hunger; this sensation becomes intense with a relatively small rise in PETCO2 if ventilation is held constant. Spontaneously breathing subjects increase ventilation in response to CO2, thereby greatly diminishing air hunger. In healthy subjects and ventilator-dependent patients, experimenter-induced increases in ventilator tidal volume (VT) relieve air hunger even if PETCO2 is kept elevated. We addressed two questions: (1) Can paralyzed, ventilator-dependent patients use the sensation of air hunger to effectively control ventilator VT using nonrespiratory motor pathways; and (2) Do subjects obtain more relief when in control of their own ventilator? Four subjects were trained to increase ventilator VT using a mouth-operated switch. Subjects' ratings of air hunger intensity in response to elevated PETCO2 were compared during three conditions: (1) constant VT; (2) subject-controlled VT; and (3) experimenter-controlled VT. When given control of their ventilator, all subjects increased VT in response to increased PETCO2, thereby relieving air hunger. Air hunger relief was similar when the experimenter mimicked these VT changes. These results suggest that: (1) ventilator-dependent patients can use sensation, conscious decisions, and nonrespiratory motor pathways to achieve an appropriate respiratory response to increased PCO2 and (2) control of one's own ventilation is unimportant in these circumstances. Bloch-Salisbury E, Spengler CM, Brown R, Banzett RB. Self-control and external control of mechanical ventilation give equal air hunger relief.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Liotti, S. Brannan, G. Egan, R. Shade, L. Madden, B. Abplanalp, R. Robillard, J. Lancaster, F. E. Zamarripa, P. T. Fox, et al.
Brain responses associated with consciousness of breathlessness (air hunger)
PNAS, February 13, 2001; 98(4): 2035 - 2040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1998 American Thoracic Society