help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SENTHILSELVAN, A.
Right arrow Articles by RHODES, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SENTHILSELVAN, A.
Right arrow Articles by RHODES, C. S.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 156, Number 2, August 1997, 410-417

Positive Human Health Effects of Dust Suppression with Canola Oil in Swine Barns

A. SENTHILSELVAN, Y. ZHANG, J. A. DOSMAN, E. M. BARBER, L. E. HOLFELD, S. P. KIRYCHUK, Y. CORMIER, T. S. HURST, and C. S. RHODES

Centre for Agricultural Medicine, Department of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Department of Agricultural and Bioresource Engineering, Division of Respiratory Medicine and College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada; and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

A crossover trial was conducted to evaluate the acute human health effects of a dust control technology in a swine confinement facility. Twenty lifetime nonsmoking male subjects, with no evidence of allergy or asthma and no previous swine barn exposure, participated in the study, which included a laboratory session (baseline), 5-h exposure in a swine room sprinkled with canola oil (treatment) and 5-h exposure in a traditional swine room (control). Mean values of inhalable dust concentrations and endotoxin levels in the control room were significantly greater than those observed in the treatment room. Mean shift changes in FEV1 from preexposure to end of exposure were 1.1% (standard error, 0.63%) on baseline day, -1.9% (0.63%) on treatment day, and -9.9% (1.12%) on control day; the differences in the shift changes were statistically significant. Mean value of methacholine concentration that reduced the FEV1 by 20% (PC20) in bronchoprovocation tests on baseline day was significantly different from that on treatment day (p = 0.04) and that on control day (p < 0.001). Significant increases were also observed in white blood cell counts and nasal lavage cell counts on the control day in comparison with the other two days. Blood neutrophil counts after control room exposure were twice those observed on baseline and after exposure to the treatment room. Significant differences were also observed in IL-1beta , IL-6, and IL-8 nasal lavage cytokines and in IL-6 serum cytokine. These results suggest that the canola oil dust control method is effective in improving indoor air quality in swine barns and reducing acute health effects in naive healthy subjects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Senthilselvan, L. Chenard, K. Ulmer, N. Gibson-Burlinguette, C. Leuschen, and J. A. Dosman
Excess Respiratory Symptoms in Full-time Male and Female Workers in Large-Scale Swine Operations
Chest, April 1, 2007; 131(4): 1197 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. Chenard, A. Senthilselvan, V. K. Grover, S. P. Kirychuk, J. A. Lawson, T. S. Hurst, and J. A. Dosman
Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers
Chest, January 1, 2007; 131(1): 245 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M B Schenker
Farming and asthma
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2005; 62(4): 211 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J.A. Dosman, J.A. Lawson, S.P. Kirychuk, Y. Cormier, J. Biem, and N. Koehncke
Occupational asthma in newly employed workers in intensive swine confinement facilities
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Romberger, V. Bodlak, S. G. Von Essen, T. Mathisen, and T. A. Wyatt
Hog barn dust extract stimulates IL-8 and IL-6 release in human bronchial epithelial cells via PKC activation
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2002; 93(1): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. A. Dosman, A. Senthilselvan, S. P. Kirychuk, S. Lemay, E. M. Barber, P. Willson, Y. Cormier, and T. S. Hurst
Positive Human Health Effects of Wearing a Respirator in a Swine Barn
Chest, September 1, 2000; 118(3): 852 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Y. CORMIER, M. LAVIOLETTE, G. BEDARD, J. DOSMAN, and E. ISRAEL-ASSAYAG
Effect of Route of Breathing on Response to Exposure in a Swine Confinement Building
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 1997; 157(5): 1512 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1997 American Thoracic Society