help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capderou, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zelter, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capderou, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zelter, M.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 155, No. 6, Jun 1997, 1930-1934.

Comparison of indirect calorimetry and thermodilution cardiac output measurement in children

A Capderou, D Douguet, J Losay and M Zelter
Hopital Marie-Lannelongue and Departement de Physiologie, Faculte deMedecine Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.

We validated experimentally the ability of hood indirect calorimetry to measure accurately VO2. For this purpose we compared cardiac output calculated from the Fick equation Q = VO2/(Ca(O2) - CV(O2)), in which VO2 was obtained by hood indirect calorimetry, to thermodilution cardiac output (Qth) measured simultaneously during cardiac catheterization in children (n = 16). Because FI(CO2) is a critical factor in hood indirect calorimetry calculations, we also assessed the consequence of taking into account measured FI(CO2) rather than using the usual standard value of 0.0004. We found a good agreement between Q and Qth whether we used experimentally measured FI(CO2) in ambient air (Qth = 0.89 Q + 0.39, r = 0.941) or standard FI(CO2) (Qth = 0.84 Q + 0.55, r = 0.930). However, VCO2 and R computed from standard FI(CO2) differed significantly (p < 0.001) from values derived from measured FI(CO2). This demonstrates that indirect calorimetry allows reasonable estimates of Q, VO2, VCO2, and R provided that the actual values of FI(CO2) are used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
M. Engoren and D. Barbee
Comparison of Cardiac Output Determined by Bioimpedance, Thermodilution, and the Fick Method
Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 40 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1997 American Thoracic Society